Why Care About Robots? Empathy, Moral Standing, and the Language of Suffering

Mark Coeckelbergh
{"title":"Why Care About Robots? Empathy, Moral Standing, and the Language of Suffering","authors":"Mark Coeckelbergh","doi":"10.2478/kjps-2018-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper tries to understand the phenomenon that humans are able to empathize with robots and the intuition that there might be something wrong with “abusing” robots by discussing the question regarding the moral standing of robots. After a review of some relevant work in empirical psychology and a discussion of the ethics of empathizing with robots, a philosophical argument concerning the moral standing of robots is made that questions distant and uncritical moral reasoning about entities’ properties and that recommends first trying to understand the issue by means of philosophical and artistic work that shows how ethics is always relational and historical, and that highlights the importance of language and appearance in moral reasoning and moral psychology. It is concluded that attention to relationality and to verbal and non-verbal languages of suffering is key to understand the phenomenon under investigation, and that in robot ethics we need less certainty and more caution and patience when it comes to thinking about moral standing.","PeriodicalId":52005,"journal":{"name":"Kairos-Journal of Philosophy & Science","volume":"48 1","pages":"141 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kairos-Journal of Philosophy & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/kjps-2018-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Abstract This paper tries to understand the phenomenon that humans are able to empathize with robots and the intuition that there might be something wrong with “abusing” robots by discussing the question regarding the moral standing of robots. After a review of some relevant work in empirical psychology and a discussion of the ethics of empathizing with robots, a philosophical argument concerning the moral standing of robots is made that questions distant and uncritical moral reasoning about entities’ properties and that recommends first trying to understand the issue by means of philosophical and artistic work that shows how ethics is always relational and historical, and that highlights the importance of language and appearance in moral reasoning and moral psychology. It is concluded that attention to relationality and to verbal and non-verbal languages of suffering is key to understand the phenomenon under investigation, and that in robot ethics we need less certainty and more caution and patience when it comes to thinking about moral standing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么要关注机器人?同理心,道德地位和痛苦的语言
本文试图通过讨论机器人的道德地位问题来理解人类能够同情机器人的现象,以及“滥用”机器人可能有问题的直觉。在回顾了经验心理学中的一些相关工作并讨论了与机器人共情的伦理之后,提出了一个关于机器人道德地位的哲学论点,该论点质疑了关于实体属性的遥远和不加批判的道德推理,并建议首先尝试通过哲学和艺术作品来理解这个问题,这些作品表明道德是如何始终是相关的和历史的。这就突出了语言和外表在道德推理和道德心理学中的重要性。结论是,对关系的关注以及对痛苦的语言和非语言的关注是理解正在调查的现象的关键,在机器人伦理学中,当涉及到思考道德地位时,我们需要更少的确定性,更多的谨慎和耐心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
A parrésia em Foucault - tecimentos Lying, computers and self-awareness Equações Como Ícones (Seguidos Das Suas Peircianas “Verdades Insuspeitadas”) On how statistics is used and abused to find truth in Science Jean-Yves Mercury, Chemins Avec et Autour de Merleau-Ponty (Paris, L’Harmattan, 2019)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1