Abdulmalik Aldawsari, S. Yusuf, R. Souissi, Muhammad Al-Qurishi
{"title":"Real-Time Instance Segmentation Models for Identification of Vehicle Parts","authors":"Abdulmalik Aldawsari, S. Yusuf, R. Souissi, Muhammad Al-Qurishi","doi":"10.1155/2023/6460639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated assessment of car damage is a major challenge in the auto repair and damage assessment industries. The domain has several application areas, ranging from car assessment companies, such as car rentals and body shops, to accidental damage assessment for car insurance companies. In vehicle assessment, the damage can take many forms, from scratches, minor dents, and major dents to missing parts. Often, the assessment area has a significant level of noise, such as dirt, grease, oil, or rush, which makes accurate identification challenging. Moreover, in the repair industry, identifying a particular part is the first step in obtaining an accurate labor and part assessment, where the presence of different car models, shapes, and sizes makes the task even more challenging for a machine-learning model to perform well. To address these challenges, this study explores and applies various instance segmentation methodologies to determine the best-performing models. This study focuses on two genres of real-time instance segmentation models, namely, SipMask and YOLACT, owing to their industrial significance. These methodologies were evaluated against a previously reported car parts dataset (DSMLR) as well as an internally curated dataset extracted from local car repair workshops. The YOLACT-based part localization and segmentation method outperformed other real-time instance mechanisms with an mAP of 66.5. For the workshop repair dataset, SipMask++ reported better accuracy for object detection with a mAP of 57.0, with outcomes for \n \n A\n \n \n P\n \n \n I\n o\n U\n =\n .\n 50\n \n \n \n and \n \n A\n \n \n P\n \n \n I\n o\n U\n =\n .\n 75\n \n \n \n reporting 72.0 and 67.0, respectively, whereas YOLACT was observed to be a better performer for \n \n A\n \n \n P\n \n \n s\n \n \n \n with 44.0 and 2.6 for object detection and segmentation categories, respectively.","PeriodicalId":72654,"journal":{"name":"Complex psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"6460639:1-6460639:16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6460639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Automated assessment of car damage is a major challenge in the auto repair and damage assessment industries. The domain has several application areas, ranging from car assessment companies, such as car rentals and body shops, to accidental damage assessment for car insurance companies. In vehicle assessment, the damage can take many forms, from scratches, minor dents, and major dents to missing parts. Often, the assessment area has a significant level of noise, such as dirt, grease, oil, or rush, which makes accurate identification challenging. Moreover, in the repair industry, identifying a particular part is the first step in obtaining an accurate labor and part assessment, where the presence of different car models, shapes, and sizes makes the task even more challenging for a machine-learning model to perform well. To address these challenges, this study explores and applies various instance segmentation methodologies to determine the best-performing models. This study focuses on two genres of real-time instance segmentation models, namely, SipMask and YOLACT, owing to their industrial significance. These methodologies were evaluated against a previously reported car parts dataset (DSMLR) as well as an internally curated dataset extracted from local car repair workshops. The YOLACT-based part localization and segmentation method outperformed other real-time instance mechanisms with an mAP of 66.5. For the workshop repair dataset, SipMask++ reported better accuracy for object detection with a mAP of 57.0, with outcomes for
A
P
I
o
U
=
.
50
and
A
P
I
o
U
=
.
75
reporting 72.0 and 67.0, respectively, whereas YOLACT was observed to be a better performer for
A
P
s
with 44.0 and 2.6 for object detection and segmentation categories, respectively.
汽车损伤的自动评估是汽车修理和损伤评估行业面临的主要挑战。该领域有几个应用领域,从汽车评估公司(如汽车租赁和车身商店)到汽车保险公司的意外损害评估。在车辆评估中,损坏可以采取多种形式,从划痕,小凹痕,大凹痕到缺失的部件。通常,评估区域具有显著的噪声水平,例如污垢、油脂、油或冲流,这使得准确识别具有挑战性。此外,在维修行业,识别特定零件是获得准确劳动力和零件评估的第一步,而不同车型、形状和尺寸的存在使得机器学习模型的任务更加具有挑战性。为了应对这些挑战,本研究探索并应用了各种实例分割方法来确定性能最佳的模型。鉴于实时实例分割模型的工业意义,本研究重点研究了两种类型的实时实例分割模型,即SipMask和YOLACT。这些方法是根据先前报告的汽车零件数据集(DSMLR)以及从当地汽车维修车间提取的内部策划数据集进行评估的。基于yolact的零件定位与分割方法的mAP值为66.5,优于其他实时实例机制。对于车间维修数据集,SipMask++报告的目标检测精度更高,mAP为57.0,结果为a P I o U =。50 A P I o U =。75人分别报告72.0和67.0,而YOLACT在对象检测和分割类别方面的表现分别为44.0和2.6。