Povaha písma, jeho meze a nosiče : výpisky a poznámky k historickým aspektům mediální dimenze psaní a literární komunikace

IF 0.1 4区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, SLAVIC CESKA LITERATURA Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.5167/UZH-123193
Tomáš Glanc
{"title":"Povaha písma, jeho meze a nosiče : výpisky a poznámky k historickým aspektům mediální dimenze psaní a literární komunikace","authors":"Tomáš Glanc","doi":"10.5167/UZH-123193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines literature from the standpoint of mediality, defining medium as an act, i.e. “an apparatus brought into operation”. A new sensitivity towards the media dimension of literary communication, bolstered by new technologies, applies to typeface and writing itself, the media of the work and communication — the treatment of the work as a physical phenomenon. The media dimension of writing is not just conceived as a phenomenon bound to digital data or the internet, but as an age-old element in the treatment of texts and associated both with the meanings of texts and the authority mediated by texts. From these standpoints samizdat also appears to be a noteworthy phenomenon which creates a particular materiality for writing, along with various forms of experimental treatment of typeface, writing and text. One productive tool here appears to be Aarseth’s ergodicity, a term applied to an attribute of a work that involves or creates rules on which its non-linear “usage” is based. On the basis of a number of specific cases it is shown what media-“staged” and variously produced (cf. Kittler) text might be like, and what uncertainties apply to it. From this standpoint avant-garde experiments confront questions raised by theologians, mystics and glossolalia theorists.","PeriodicalId":42645,"journal":{"name":"CESKA LITERATURA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CESKA LITERATURA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-123193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines literature from the standpoint of mediality, defining medium as an act, i.e. “an apparatus brought into operation”. A new sensitivity towards the media dimension of literary communication, bolstered by new technologies, applies to typeface and writing itself, the media of the work and communication — the treatment of the work as a physical phenomenon. The media dimension of writing is not just conceived as a phenomenon bound to digital data or the internet, but as an age-old element in the treatment of texts and associated both with the meanings of texts and the authority mediated by texts. From these standpoints samizdat also appears to be a noteworthy phenomenon which creates a particular materiality for writing, along with various forms of experimental treatment of typeface, writing and text. One productive tool here appears to be Aarseth’s ergodicity, a term applied to an attribute of a work that involves or creates rules on which its non-linear “usage” is based. On the basis of a number of specific cases it is shown what media-“staged” and variously produced (cf. Kittler) text might be like, and what uncertainties apply to it. From this standpoint avant-garde experiments confront questions raised by theologians, mystics and glossolalia theorists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文从媒介的角度考察文学,将媒介定义为一种行为,即“一种投入运行的装置”。在新技术的支持下,对文学传播媒介维度的新敏感性适用于字体和写作本身,作品和传播的媒介-将作品视为一种物理现象。写作的媒体维度不仅被认为是一种与数字数据或互联网相关联的现象,而且是处理文本的一个古老元素,与文本的意义和文本中介的权威相关联。从这些角度来看,地下出版物似乎也是一个值得注意的现象,它为写作创造了一种特殊的物质性,以及各种形式的字体、写作和文本的实验性处理。这里的一个有效工具似乎是Aarseth的遍历性,这个术语适用于涉及或创建其非线性“使用”所基于的规则的作品的属性。在一些具体案例的基础上,展示了媒介-“上演”和各种生产(参见Kittler)文本可能是什么样子,以及适用于它的不确定性。从这个观点出发,前卫实验面对着由神学家、神秘主义者和舌语理论家提出的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CESKA LITERATURA
CESKA LITERATURA LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Česká Literatura is a Czech international scholarly journal of Czech literary theory and history and is published by the Institute of Czech Literature of the Czech Academy of Sciences. The journal presents the best Czech and foreign scholarly articles and essays on Czech literature, accompanied by summaries in major world languages. It contributes new approaches to problems of literary history through the publication of such resources as newly discovered archival material and papers from private collections. Česká Literatura cooperates with the revived Prague Linguistic Circle and pursues productive contemporary methodologies and criticism in the Prague School tradition of Jacobson, Mukařovský, Vodička and Bogatyrev.
期刊最新文献
Karel Hausenblas and literary theory Mary the cannibal Contradictory interactions Language, style, semantic contexts Questioning and self-reflection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1