Vulnerability and resilience to food and nutrition insecurity: A review of the literature towards a unified framework

IF 1.8 Q2 ECONOMICS Bio-based and Applied Economics Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.36253/bae-14125
P. Montalbano, D. Romano
{"title":"Vulnerability and resilience to food and nutrition insecurity: A review of the literature towards a unified framework","authors":"P. Montalbano, D. Romano","doi":"10.36253/bae-14125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current approaches to measuring food and nutrition security (FNS) mainly consider past access to food, while assessing vulnerability and resilience to food insecurity requires a dynamic setting and sound predictive models, conditional to the entire set of food-related multiple-scale shocks and stresses as well as households’ characteristics. The aim of this work is twofold: i) to review the state of the relevant literature on the conceptualization and the empirical measurement of vulnerability and resilience to food insecurity; ii) to frame the main coordinates of a possible unifying framework aiming at improving ex-ante targeting of policy interventions and resilience-enhancing programs. Our argument is that clarifying the relationships existing between vulnerability and resilience provides a better understanding and a more comprehensive picture of food insecurity that includes higher-order conditional moments and non-linearities. Furthermore, adopting the proposed unified framework, one can derive FNS measures that are: scalable and aggregable into higher-level dimensions (scale axiom); inherently dynamic (time axiom); conditioned to various factors (access axiom); applicable to various measures of food and nutrition as dependent variables (outcomes axiom). Unfortunately, the proposed unified framework shows some limitations. First, estimating conditional moments is highly data-demanding, requiring high-quality and high-frequency micro-level panel data for all the relevant FNS dimensions, not mentioning the difficulty of measuring risks/shocks and their associated probabilities using short panel data. Hence, there is a general issue of applicability of the proposed approach to typically data-scarce environments such as developing contexts. Second, there is an inherent tradeoff between the proposed approach in-sample precision and out-of-sample predictive performance. This is key to implement effective early warning systems and foster resilience-building programs.","PeriodicalId":44385,"journal":{"name":"Bio-based and Applied Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bio-based and Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-14125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current approaches to measuring food and nutrition security (FNS) mainly consider past access to food, while assessing vulnerability and resilience to food insecurity requires a dynamic setting and sound predictive models, conditional to the entire set of food-related multiple-scale shocks and stresses as well as households’ characteristics. The aim of this work is twofold: i) to review the state of the relevant literature on the conceptualization and the empirical measurement of vulnerability and resilience to food insecurity; ii) to frame the main coordinates of a possible unifying framework aiming at improving ex-ante targeting of policy interventions and resilience-enhancing programs. Our argument is that clarifying the relationships existing between vulnerability and resilience provides a better understanding and a more comprehensive picture of food insecurity that includes higher-order conditional moments and non-linearities. Furthermore, adopting the proposed unified framework, one can derive FNS measures that are: scalable and aggregable into higher-level dimensions (scale axiom); inherently dynamic (time axiom); conditioned to various factors (access axiom); applicable to various measures of food and nutrition as dependent variables (outcomes axiom). Unfortunately, the proposed unified framework shows some limitations. First, estimating conditional moments is highly data-demanding, requiring high-quality and high-frequency micro-level panel data for all the relevant FNS dimensions, not mentioning the difficulty of measuring risks/shocks and their associated probabilities using short panel data. Hence, there is a general issue of applicability of the proposed approach to typically data-scarce environments such as developing contexts. Second, there is an inherent tradeoff between the proposed approach in-sample precision and out-of-sample predictive performance. This is key to implement effective early warning systems and foster resilience-building programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粮食和营养不安全的脆弱性和复原力:对统一框架的文献综述
目前衡量粮食和营养安全(FNS)的方法主要考虑过去的粮食获取情况,而评估对粮食不安全的脆弱性和恢复力需要一个动态环境和健全的预测模型,并以与粮食有关的全套多尺度冲击和压力以及家庭特征为条件。这项工作的目的是双重的:i)回顾有关粮食不安全脆弱性和恢复力的概念化和实证测量的相关文献的现状;Ii)构建一个可能的统一框架的主要坐标,旨在改善政策干预和增强韧性计划的事前目标。我们的观点是,澄清脆弱性和恢复力之间存在的关系可以更好地理解和更全面地了解粮食不安全,包括高阶条件矩和非线性。此外,采用所提出的统一框架,可以推导出以下FNS度量:可扩展和可聚合到更高层次的维度(尺度公理);内在动态(时间公理);受各种因素制约(存取公理);适用于作为因变量的食物和营养的各种测量(结果公理)。不幸的是,提出的统一框架显示出一些局限性。首先,估计条件矩对数据要求很高,需要所有相关FNS维度的高质量和高频微观水平面板数据,更不用说使用短面板数据测量风险/冲击及其相关概率的难度。因此,所建议的方法是否适用于典型的数据稀缺环境(如开发环境)是一个普遍的问题。其次,所提出的方法在样本内精度和样本外预测性能之间存在固有的权衡。这是实施有效预警系统和促进复原力建设项目的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Bio-based and Applied Economics (BAE) provides a forum for presentation and discussion of applied research in the field of bio-based sectors and related policies, informing evidence-based decision-making and policy-making. It intends to provide a scholarly source of theoretical and applied studies while remaining widely accessible for non-researchers. BAE seeks applied contributions on the economics of bio-based industries, such as agriculture, forestry, fishery and food, dealing with any related disciplines, such as resource and environmental economics, consumer studies, regional economics, innovation and development economics. Beside well-established fields of research related to these sectors, BAE aims in particular to explore cross-sectoral, recent and emerging themes characterizing the integrated management of biological resources, bio-based industries and sustainable development of rural areas. A special attention is also paid to the linkages between local and international dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Towards a holistic approach to sustainable risk management in agriculture in the EU: a literature review Modelling technical efficiency of horticulture farming in Kosovo: An application of data envelopment analysis Reducing food-related economic loss to improve food security and cattle trade in the Sahel: the case of agropastoral systems in Senegal Incorporating expert knowledge in the estimate of farmers’ opportunity cost of supplying environmental services in rural Cameroon CAP, Farm to Fork and Green Deal: policy coherence, governance, and future challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1