Comparison of Carbamazipine and Amitryptyline for the Reduction of Diabetic Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Mm Rahman, R. Khan, N. Rizvi, Md Arifuzzaman M, A. Sharif, S. Khanam
{"title":"Comparison of Carbamazipine and Amitryptyline for the Reduction of Diabetic Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Mm Rahman, R. Khan, N. Rizvi, Md Arifuzzaman M, A. Sharif, S. Khanam","doi":"10.3329/bjn.v33i1.57462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diabetic neuropathy is very difficult to treat.\nObjective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of carbamazepine and amitryptyline for reduction of diabetic neuropathic pain.\nMethodology: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted in the department of Neurology including Neuropathy Clinic of BSMMU and in collaboration with department of Endocrinology, BSMMU, Dhaka from January 2012 to December 2013 for a period of two (2) years. Adult diabetic patients presented with neuropathic pain with symmetrical involvement of distal limbs from indoor and outpatient department of Neurology including Neuropathy clinic as well as indoor and outpatient department of Endocrinology, BSMMU were enrolled in the study population. The study population was divided into two groups named as group A and group B. The group A was experimental group. In this group, patients were treated with oral carbamazepine 400mg/day in two divided doses for initial 2 weeks, then 600mg/ day in three divided doses for further 4 weeks. The group B was control group. In this group, patients were treated with oral amitriptyline 25mg/ day at night for initial 2 weeks, then 50mg/day taking at night for further 4 weeks. During trial, three follow ups were taken at 2 weeks interval and encountered the clinical response by pain score (VAS) and the side effects. The first follow up after 2 weeks of treatment; the second follow up was after 4 weeks of treatment and the third follow up was after 6 weeks of treatment.\nResult: A total number of 110 cases clinically diagnosed as painful diabetic polyneuropathy, then 56 cases randomly selected for Group A and 54 cases randomly selected for Group B. During follow up of 6 weeks, 2 case of Group A developed skin rash for which they discontinued drug. From rest of cases, 2 from Group A and 4 from Group B were dropped out. Because they did not come for follow up. So finally 52 cases for Group A group and 50 cases for Group B group were studied. A total of 102 patients were included in the study. They were divided into four Groups according to their age. The mean age was found 52.17(±10.02) years in Group A and 53.41(±8.82) years in Group B. The mean (±SD) of percent improvement in Group A and Group B were 41.11(±11.29) vs. 31.76(±19.14) (P<0.05). Dizziness and Drowsiness were found in Group A as 33.3% and 37.0%. But in Group B dryness of mouth and constipation were found as 46.3% and 7.4%.\nConclusion: In conclusion carbamazepine produced greater improvements than amitriptyline in relieving pain and paresthesia associated with diabetic neuropathy.\nBangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2017; Vol. 33 (1): 6-12","PeriodicalId":8727,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjn.v33i1.57462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic neuropathy is very difficult to treat. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of carbamazepine and amitryptyline for reduction of diabetic neuropathic pain. Methodology: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted in the department of Neurology including Neuropathy Clinic of BSMMU and in collaboration with department of Endocrinology, BSMMU, Dhaka from January 2012 to December 2013 for a period of two (2) years. Adult diabetic patients presented with neuropathic pain with symmetrical involvement of distal limbs from indoor and outpatient department of Neurology including Neuropathy clinic as well as indoor and outpatient department of Endocrinology, BSMMU were enrolled in the study population. The study population was divided into two groups named as group A and group B. The group A was experimental group. In this group, patients were treated with oral carbamazepine 400mg/day in two divided doses for initial 2 weeks, then 600mg/ day in three divided doses for further 4 weeks. The group B was control group. In this group, patients were treated with oral amitriptyline 25mg/ day at night for initial 2 weeks, then 50mg/day taking at night for further 4 weeks. During trial, three follow ups were taken at 2 weeks interval and encountered the clinical response by pain score (VAS) and the side effects. The first follow up after 2 weeks of treatment; the second follow up was after 4 weeks of treatment and the third follow up was after 6 weeks of treatment. Result: A total number of 110 cases clinically diagnosed as painful diabetic polyneuropathy, then 56 cases randomly selected for Group A and 54 cases randomly selected for Group B. During follow up of 6 weeks, 2 case of Group A developed skin rash for which they discontinued drug. From rest of cases, 2 from Group A and 4 from Group B were dropped out. Because they did not come for follow up. So finally 52 cases for Group A group and 50 cases for Group B group were studied. A total of 102 patients were included in the study. They were divided into four Groups according to their age. The mean age was found 52.17(±10.02) years in Group A and 53.41(±8.82) years in Group B. The mean (±SD) of percent improvement in Group A and Group B were 41.11(±11.29) vs. 31.76(±19.14) (P<0.05). Dizziness and Drowsiness were found in Group A as 33.3% and 37.0%. But in Group B dryness of mouth and constipation were found as 46.3% and 7.4%. Conclusion: In conclusion carbamazepine produced greater improvements than amitriptyline in relieving pain and paresthesia associated with diabetic neuropathy. Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2017; Vol. 33 (1): 6-12
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡马西平与阿米替林减轻糖尿病神经性疼痛的比较:一项随机临床试验
背景:糖尿病性神经病变的治疗非常困难。目的:比较卡马西平与阿米替林减轻糖尿病神经性疼痛的疗效和安全性。方法:这是一项随机对照试验,于2012年1月至2013年12月在包括BSMMU神经病变门诊在内的神经内科进行,并与达卡BSMMU内分泌科合作,为期两年。研究对象为来自包括神经内科在内的神经内科室门部和BSMMU内分泌内科室门部的以远端肢体对称受累的神经性疼痛为临床表现的成年糖尿病患者。将研究人群分为A组和b组,其中A组为实验组。在该组中,患者最初2周口服卡马西平400mg/天,分两次给药,然后600mg/天,分三次给药,再持续4周。B组为对照组。在该组中,患者在最初的2周内每晚口服阿米替林25mg/天,然后在接下来的4周内每晚口服50mg/天。在试验期间,每隔2周进行3次随访,通过疼痛评分(VAS)和副作用观察临床反应。治疗2周后第一次随访;第二次随访于治疗4周后,第三次随访于治疗6周后。结果:临床诊断为疼痛性糖尿病性多神经病变110例,随机抽取A组56例,随机抽取b组54例。随访6周,A组2例出现皮疹并停药。其余病例中,A组2例、B组4例退出。因为他们没有来跟进。最终A组52例,B组50例。研究共纳入102例患者。他们按年龄分为四组。A组患者平均年龄为52.17(±10.02)岁,B组患者平均年龄为53.41(±8.82)岁。A组和B组患者改善百分比的平均值(±SD)分别为41.11(±11.29)和31.76(±19.14),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组出现头晕、嗜睡分别为33.3%和37.0%。B组口腔干燥和便秘分别占46.3%和7.4%。结论:卡马西平在缓解糖尿病神经病变相关疼痛和感觉异常方面比阿米替林有更大的改善。孟加拉国神经科学杂志2017;Vol. 33 (1): 6-12
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Risk Factors on the Size of Ruptured Intracranial Saccular Aneurysms Demographic and Clinical Pattern of Headache in Migraine Patients Infarct Pattern in Patients with Varying Degrees of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Prognostic significance of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Score in predicting 30-day mortality in Chittagong Medical College Hospital Clinical, Autonomic & Electrophysiological Features in Patients with Guillain Barre Syndrome in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1