Enhancing widening participation evaluation through the development of a selfassessment tool for practitioners: learning from the OfS project Standards of Evaluation Practice (Phase 2) 2017–2019

Anna Mountford-Zimdars, Joanne Moore, R. Shiner
{"title":"Enhancing widening participation evaluation through the development of a selfassessment tool for practitioners: learning from the OfS project Standards of Evaluation Practice (Phase 2) 2017–2019","authors":"Anna Mountford-Zimdars, Joanne Moore, R. Shiner","doi":"10.5456/wpll.22.2.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ultimate goal of widening participation work, which unites policymakers, practitioners and academics, is to enhance the experience of disadvantaged students relating to HE access, success and outcomes. This article presents the Office for Students' (OfS) commissioned project Standards\n of Evaluation Practice (Phase 2). This project sought to create a step-change in robustness of evidence used and evaluation practices. Our 2017 – 19 project explored evaluation practices among nine partner organisations drawn from higher education providers (HEPs) and third-sector\n partners. The initial aim was to pilot test the Standards of Evidence of Evaluation developed during Phase 1 research; share practices that work and highlight examples of best practice. As the project developed, a further outcome was envisaged through ongoing discussions between the OfS, academics,\n HEPs and third-sector parties: a self-assessment tool for evaluation practitioners. This tool provides a framework and guidance which allow practitioners to map their own evaluation approaches. Through using prompts, the five dimensions of the tool highlight strengths and weaknesses of evaluation\n within five domains (strategic context, programme design, evaluation design, evaluation implementation and learning). This new tool is, in effect, a five-point framework setting guidance about good evaluation practice. It was rolled out to all HEPs in spring 2019, when providers were invited\n to return the completed tool and their reflection as part of their access and participation planning.","PeriodicalId":90763,"journal":{"name":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","volume":"25 1","pages":"44-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5456/wpll.22.2.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ultimate goal of widening participation work, which unites policymakers, practitioners and academics, is to enhance the experience of disadvantaged students relating to HE access, success and outcomes. This article presents the Office for Students' (OfS) commissioned project Standards of Evaluation Practice (Phase 2). This project sought to create a step-change in robustness of evidence used and evaluation practices. Our 2017 – 19 project explored evaluation practices among nine partner organisations drawn from higher education providers (HEPs) and third-sector partners. The initial aim was to pilot test the Standards of Evidence of Evaluation developed during Phase 1 research; share practices that work and highlight examples of best practice. As the project developed, a further outcome was envisaged through ongoing discussions between the OfS, academics, HEPs and third-sector parties: a self-assessment tool for evaluation practitioners. This tool provides a framework and guidance which allow practitioners to map their own evaluation approaches. Through using prompts, the five dimensions of the tool highlight strengths and weaknesses of evaluation within five domains (strategic context, programme design, evaluation design, evaluation implementation and learning). This new tool is, in effect, a five-point framework setting guidance about good evaluation practice. It was rolled out to all HEPs in spring 2019, when providers were invited to return the completed tool and their reflection as part of their access and participation planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过开发从业人员自我评估工具加强广泛参与评估:借鉴OfS项目评估实践标准(第二阶段)2017-2019
扩大参与工作将政策制定者、实践者和学者联合起来,其最终目标是增强弱势学生在高等教育机会、成功和成果方面的经验。本文介绍了学生办公室(OfS)委托的评估实践标准项目(第二阶段)。该项目试图在使用的证据和评估实践的稳健性方面创造一个阶段性的变化。我们的2017 - 19项目探索了来自高等教育提供者(HEPs)和第三部门合作伙伴的9个合作伙伴组织的评估实践。最初的目的是对第一阶段研究期间制定的评价证据标准进行试点测试;分享有效的实践,并突出显示最佳实践的示例。随着项目的发展,OfS、学术界、hep和第三方之间正在进行的讨论设想了一个进一步的结果:一个评估从业者的自我评估工具。这个工具提供了一个框架和指导,允许从业者绘制他们自己的评估方法。通过使用提示,该工具的五个维度突出了五个领域(战略背景、方案设计、评价设计、评价实施和学习)内评价的优势和劣势。这个新工具实际上是一个五点框架,为良好的评估实践提供指导。该工具于2019年春季在所有hep中推出,当时供应商被邀请返回完成的工具及其反映,作为其访问和参与计划的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Higher education policies for applicants with criminal records in the United Kingdom: Are universities ‘banning the box’? Scientist encounters: Igniting parental aspirations to support young scientists ‐ a pilot study Editorial – general edition A typology of social equity discourses and its contribution to a wicked problem Can role models help encourage young people to apply to (selective) universities? Evidence from a large-scale English field experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1