{"title":"The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Lesions","authors":"S. Yoshinaga","doi":"10.4103/1947-2714.175186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since Vilmann et al.[1] reported their results with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), EUS-FNA has been spread as a good diagnostic tool for gastrointestinal and perigastrointestinal lesions such as gastrointestinal submucosal tumors, pancreatic lesions, abdominal and mediastinal lymphadenopathies, ascites, and adrenal lesions.[2] EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions is especially important because of its high diagnostic yield.[3] However, to achieve good specimens, we should consider many issues such as the selection of needle size, necessity of stylet and suction, number of strokes and passes, presence of the on-site cytopathologist, and so on. Additionally, when we puncture pancreatic cystic lesions, we should consider not only pathological evaluation but also fluid analysis.[4] Some of these issues are still controversial although there are many articles about them. Recently, EUS-guided, through-the-needle confocal laser-induced endomicroscopy and cystoscopy for pancreatic cystic neoplasms have been reported.[5] In this way, EUS-FNA will be developed and its use will spread all the more. Jani et al.[6] reviewed the present status of EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions systematically. This review is one of good guides to EUS-FNA, and we can get a lot of information from their article.","PeriodicalId":19703,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":"12 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.175186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Since Vilmann et al.[1] reported their results with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), EUS-FNA has been spread as a good diagnostic tool for gastrointestinal and perigastrointestinal lesions such as gastrointestinal submucosal tumors, pancreatic lesions, abdominal and mediastinal lymphadenopathies, ascites, and adrenal lesions.[2] EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions is especially important because of its high diagnostic yield.[3] However, to achieve good specimens, we should consider many issues such as the selection of needle size, necessity of stylet and suction, number of strokes and passes, presence of the on-site cytopathologist, and so on. Additionally, when we puncture pancreatic cystic lesions, we should consider not only pathological evaluation but also fluid analysis.[4] Some of these issues are still controversial although there are many articles about them. Recently, EUS-guided, through-the-needle confocal laser-induced endomicroscopy and cystoscopy for pancreatic cystic neoplasms have been reported.[5] In this way, EUS-FNA will be developed and its use will spread all the more. Jani et al.[6] reviewed the present status of EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions systematically. This review is one of good guides to EUS-FNA, and we can get a lot of information from their article.