Approach to Integrate Indigenous Dispute Resolution Mechanisms as Restorative Justice in Ethiopian Criminal Justice System

Abebe Bahiru Bezabh
{"title":"Approach to Integrate Indigenous Dispute Resolution Mechanisms as Restorative Justice in Ethiopian Criminal Justice System","authors":"Abebe Bahiru Bezabh","doi":"10.13189/SA.2019.070703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethiopia is one of the countries which have compositions of ethnic groups and indigenous peoples, most of which they have endemic modalities of peacekeeping mechanisms and conflict resolutions practices. These varieties of Indigenous Dispute Resolution Mechanisms (hereafter IDRMs) have been using as peaceful means of disputes resolution processes. In practice, despite lack of legal recognition, informally the communities have been utilizing IDRMs to settle criminal disputes including serious ethnic conflicts. The available substantive and procedural criminal laws of Ethiopia are futile to prescribe rules which may perhaps facilitate the incorporation and better use of IDRMs into the criminal justice system. This research aims to respond question how can formal criminal justice system effectively utilize IDRMs? The researcher applied qualitative research methodology that covered both primary and secondary sources. The finding shows that IDRMs necessitates recognition through integration into the formal criminal justice system based on the restorative approach is a valuable assertion. Finally, the writer suggests the application of dynamic and participatory approach of which could recognize IDRMs as a good option to the communities to resolve disputes by the predictable peaceful solution. Such an approach can limit the challenges of the formal criminal justice system; since, those indigenous resolutions are accessible, effective and efficient, less expensive, less coercive and more respectful options.","PeriodicalId":21798,"journal":{"name":"Sociology and anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology and anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/SA.2019.070703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ethiopia is one of the countries which have compositions of ethnic groups and indigenous peoples, most of which they have endemic modalities of peacekeeping mechanisms and conflict resolutions practices. These varieties of Indigenous Dispute Resolution Mechanisms (hereafter IDRMs) have been using as peaceful means of disputes resolution processes. In practice, despite lack of legal recognition, informally the communities have been utilizing IDRMs to settle criminal disputes including serious ethnic conflicts. The available substantive and procedural criminal laws of Ethiopia are futile to prescribe rules which may perhaps facilitate the incorporation and better use of IDRMs into the criminal justice system. This research aims to respond question how can formal criminal justice system effectively utilize IDRMs? The researcher applied qualitative research methodology that covered both primary and secondary sources. The finding shows that IDRMs necessitates recognition through integration into the formal criminal justice system based on the restorative approach is a valuable assertion. Finally, the writer suggests the application of dynamic and participatory approach of which could recognize IDRMs as a good option to the communities to resolve disputes by the predictable peaceful solution. Such an approach can limit the challenges of the formal criminal justice system; since, those indigenous resolutions are accessible, effective and efficient, less expensive, less coercive and more respectful options.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将土著争端解决机制作为恢复性司法纳入埃塞俄比亚刑事司法系统的途径
埃塞俄比亚是由少数民族和土著人民组成的国家之一,其中大多数都有地方性的维持和平机制和解决冲突的做法。这些不同的土著争端解决机制(以下简称IDRMs)一直被用作和平解决争端的手段。在实践中,尽管缺乏法律承认,社区一直在非正式地利用idrm解决刑事纠纷,包括严重的种族冲突。埃塞俄比亚现有的实体法和程序法无法规定可能有助于将IDRMs纳入刑事司法系统并使其得到更好利用的规则。本研究旨在回答正式刑事司法系统如何有效利用IDRMs的问题。研究人员应用了定性研究方法,涵盖了第一手和第二手资料。调查结果表明,在恢复性方法的基础上,idrm必须通过纳入正式刑事司法系统得到承认,这是一个有价值的主张。最后,作者建议采用动态和参与式的方法,这种方法可以认识到idrm是社区通过可预测的和平解决方案解决争端的良好选择。这种做法可以限制正式刑事司法系统的挑战;因为这些土著决议是可获得的、有效的和有效率的、较便宜的、较不强制的和较尊重的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond the Inches: Unveiling Cultural Influences and Gender Perceptions Regarding Height Norms in Punjabi Group Okolo's African Being-with and Heidegger's Idea of Mitsein: A Cross-Cultural Dialogue Ethno Eco-Tourism: Utilizing Nature and Culture for More Sustainable Tourism Development Socio-economic Impact of Old Persons' Cash Transfer in Mulundi Sub-location, Kitui County-Kenya Quality of Life Evaluation through Economic, Social and Cultural Indicators: Case Study Government Housing in Cairo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1