Comparative analysis of functional mobility among Hungarian community-living and institutionalized elderly individuals

É. Kovács, I. Sztruhár, L. Mészáros, Zsigmond Gyombolai, András Simon, Valéria Farkas
{"title":"Comparative analysis of functional mobility among Hungarian community-living and institutionalized elderly individuals","authors":"É. Kovács, I. Sztruhár, L. Mészáros, Zsigmond Gyombolai, András Simon, Valéria Farkas","doi":"10.1556/2066.2.2019.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Reduced functional mobility is a risk factor for falls. The Timed Up and Go test is a complex measurement tool for functional mobility. Our aims were to assess the functional mobility of: (a) community-living elderly who were participating in an exercise programme (n = 40; mean age = 73.7 years), (b) community-living elderly who were physically inactive (n = 40; mean age = 74.1 years), and (c) institutionalized elderly (n = 40; mean age = 73.5 years) and to compare the results with cut-off values for risk of fall.\n \n \n \n After measuring functional mobility, one-way independent ANOVAs and sample t-tests were used for analysis.\n \n \n \n The functional mobility of the active participants was better than that of the inactive (p < .001) and institutionalized participants (p < .001). There was no significant difference between the inactive and institutionalized participants (p = .990). The functional mobility of the active participants was better, whereas the functional mobility of the inactive participants was worse than the cut-off value of 13.5 s for risk of fall for community-living elderly. The functional mobility of the institutionalized participants did not differ from the 15-s reference value for predicting risk of fall.\n \n \n \n The results indicate that regular physical activity has a positive effect on maintaining functional mobility among both community-living and institutionalized elderly individuals.\n","PeriodicalId":52607,"journal":{"name":"Developments in Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2066.2.2019.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Reduced functional mobility is a risk factor for falls. The Timed Up and Go test is a complex measurement tool for functional mobility. Our aims were to assess the functional mobility of: (a) community-living elderly who were participating in an exercise programme (n = 40; mean age = 73.7 years), (b) community-living elderly who were physically inactive (n = 40; mean age = 74.1 years), and (c) institutionalized elderly (n = 40; mean age = 73.5 years) and to compare the results with cut-off values for risk of fall. After measuring functional mobility, one-way independent ANOVAs and sample t-tests were used for analysis. The functional mobility of the active participants was better than that of the inactive (p < .001) and institutionalized participants (p < .001). There was no significant difference between the inactive and institutionalized participants (p = .990). The functional mobility of the active participants was better, whereas the functional mobility of the inactive participants was worse than the cut-off value of 13.5 s for risk of fall for community-living elderly. The functional mobility of the institutionalized participants did not differ from the 15-s reference value for predicting risk of fall. The results indicate that regular physical activity has a positive effect on maintaining functional mobility among both community-living and institutionalized elderly individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匈牙利社区生活老年人与机构老年人功能活动能力的比较分析
功能活动能力降低是跌倒的危险因素。Timed Up and Go测试是一种复杂的功能移动测量工具。我们的目的是评估:(a)参加锻炼计划的社区生活老年人的功能活动能力(n = 40;平均年龄= 73.7岁),(b)社区生活老年人,缺乏身体活动(n = 40;平均年龄= 74.1岁)和(c)机构老年人(n = 40;平均年龄= 73.5岁),并将结果与跌倒风险的临界值进行比较。测量功能迁移度后,采用单因素独立方差分析和样本t检验进行分析。积极参与者的功能流动性优于不积极参与者(p < .001)和制度化参与者(p < .001)。不活动和制度化参与者之间无显著差异(p = .990)。运动参与者的功能活动能力较好,而不运动参与者的功能活动能力低于社区生活老年人跌倒风险的临界值13.5 s。机构参与者的功能活动能力与预测跌倒风险的15-s参考值没有差异。结果表明,有规律的身体活动对社区生活和机构老年人的功能活动能力维持均有积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the knowledge and attitudes of nurses and social caregivers in relation to falls among elderly patients in healthcare settings in a Hungarian county A comparison of the results of old-generation (MEL 60) and new-generation (SCHWIND AMARIS) refractive excimer laser treatments Should academics be concerned about articles written by ChatGPT? Investigation of the effectiveness of a complex injury prevention programme among young swimmers National eye health data from the Hungary's Comprehensive Health Protection Screening Program 2010–2020–2030 (MÁESZ)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1