Comparative study of visual results obtained with two Trifocal lens models in cataract surgery

Alfredo Amigó-Francés, Alfredo Castillo‐Gómez, D. Carmona-González, Paula Martinez-Sorribes, A. Amigó
{"title":"Comparative study of visual results obtained with two Trifocal lens models in cataract surgery","authors":"Alfredo Amigó-Francés, Alfredo Castillo‐Gómez, D. Carmona-González, Paula Martinez-Sorribes, A. Amigó","doi":"10.17352/2455-1414.000074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare visual performance and Contrast Sensitivity (CS) outcomes, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence in patients implanted with two Models of trifocal Intraocular Lenses (MIOLs). \nMethods: This non-randomized prospective clinical study included 40 eyes of 20 patients undergoing cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of two different MIOLs, the trifocal Fine Vision MIOL (20 eyes) (PhysIOL, Liege, Belgium) and the trifocal Acriva Trinova MIOL (20 eyes) (VSY, Biotechnology, The Nederlands). Visual results, CS and patient satisfaction were evaluated 3 months after surgery.  \nResults: There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding distance and intermediate visual acuity. Finevision showed better near visual outcomes than Acriva Trinova (p < 0.033). Both MIOLs provided similar CS within normal age ranges. Satisfaction test performed on uncorrected patients showed a variable presence of tolerable dysphotopsic phenomena with both MIOLs. \nConclusions: When postoperative emmetropia was achieved, both MIOLs provided good outcomes for distance and intermediate vision with no differences in contrast sensitivity. Fine Vision MIOL gave better near visual acuity results. There were tolerable dysphotopsic phenomena in both groups.","PeriodicalId":15586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Research","volume":"361 1","pages":"054-060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-1414.000074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: To compare visual performance and Contrast Sensitivity (CS) outcomes, patient satisfaction and spectacle independence in patients implanted with two Models of trifocal Intraocular Lenses (MIOLs). Methods: This non-randomized prospective clinical study included 40 eyes of 20 patients undergoing cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of two different MIOLs, the trifocal Fine Vision MIOL (20 eyes) (PhysIOL, Liege, Belgium) and the trifocal Acriva Trinova MIOL (20 eyes) (VSY, Biotechnology, The Nederlands). Visual results, CS and patient satisfaction were evaluated 3 months after surgery.  Results: There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding distance and intermediate visual acuity. Finevision showed better near visual outcomes than Acriva Trinova (p < 0.033). Both MIOLs provided similar CS within normal age ranges. Satisfaction test performed on uncorrected patients showed a variable presence of tolerable dysphotopsic phenomena with both MIOLs. Conclusions: When postoperative emmetropia was achieved, both MIOLs provided good outcomes for distance and intermediate vision with no differences in contrast sensitivity. Fine Vision MIOL gave better near visual acuity results. There were tolerable dysphotopsic phenomena in both groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种三焦晶体模型在白内障手术中视力效果的比较研究
目的:比较两种型号的三焦人工晶状体植入术患者的视觉表现、对比敏感度(CS)、患者满意度和眼镜独立性。方法:本非随机前瞻性临床研究纳入20例白内障手术患者40眼,双侧植入两种不同的MIOL,三焦Fine Vision MIOL(20眼)(PhysIOL, Liege,比利时)和三焦Acriva Trinova MIOL(20眼)(VSY, Biotechnology, the netherlands)。术后3个月评估视觉结果、CS和患者满意度。结果:两组之间的距离和中间视敏度差异无统计学意义。Finevision的近视效果优于Acriva Trinova (p < 0.033)。两种MIOLs在正常年龄范围内提供相似的CS。对未矫正的患者进行的满意度测试显示,两种MIOLs患者都存在可耐受的光异常现象。结论:当实现术后斜视时,两种MIOLs对远距离和中间视力都有良好的效果,对比敏感度没有差异。精细MIOL的近视力效果较好。两组均有可耐受的光异常现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Eight Weeks of Aerobic Exercise and Garlic Extract Use on the Blood Pressure, Fat Percentage, and Lipid Profile of Patients with Hypertension Effects of Exercise Training Intensity on Plasma Levels of Creatinine Kinas After a Myocardial Infarction in Male Wistar Rats Designing a Conceptual Pattern of E- Learning for Iran’s Universities of Medical Sciences Evaluating the Effectiveness of Self-regulation Strategy Training on Procrastination, Happiness and Academic Achievement Improving the Performance of Hospital Information Systems Using Six Sigma for Kermanshah Province Hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1