Midwives' utilization of nonpharmacological pain relief measures for labor pain management: A descriptive cross-sectional study

I. Ojong, A. Nsemo, M. Agba
{"title":"Midwives' utilization of nonpharmacological pain relief measures for labor pain management: A descriptive cross-sectional study","authors":"I. Ojong, A. Nsemo, M. Agba","doi":"10.4103/jin.jin_27_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study sought to examine midwives' utilization of nonpharmacological pain relief measures in labor pain management and to test the relationship between midwives' knowledge and utilization of nonpharmacological pain relief measures for labor pain management in secondary health facility in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was used for the study. The study was rooted in Katherine Kolcaba's Comfort theory. Totally, 67 participants were recruited for the study using the purposive sampling technique. A self-made structured questionnaire was used to obtain participants' information on knowledge, utilization, and predictors of nonpharmacological pain relief measures. Results: Although 41 (61.2%) of the participants had knowledge about nonpharmacological pain relief measures, few did not know some of the cognitive-behavioral and environmental measures in labor pain management. There was 35.8% (24/67) for utilization of cognitive-behavioral measures and 55.2% (37/67) for psychological/emotional measures for labor pain management by respondents, respectively. Fifty (74.6%) of respondents agreed that predictors such as lack of knowledge, lack of updates and training, work experience, best practice guidelines, and equipment were hindrances to utilization. There was statistically significance in relationship between the level of knowledge and utilization of nonpharmacological pain relief measures (r = 0.6, P < 0.05). Conclusion: The utilization of nonpharmacological measures for labor pain management is low, thus it is recommended that frequent education, training updates on effective labor pain management, provision of clinical guidelines on labor pain management, and enrichment of midwifery training curriculum are imperative to ensure quality labor pain management and positive health outcome.","PeriodicalId":34651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Nursing","volume":"311 1","pages":"76 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jin.jin_27_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to examine midwives' utilization of nonpharmacological pain relief measures in labor pain management and to test the relationship between midwives' knowledge and utilization of nonpharmacological pain relief measures for labor pain management in secondary health facility in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was used for the study. The study was rooted in Katherine Kolcaba's Comfort theory. Totally, 67 participants were recruited for the study using the purposive sampling technique. A self-made structured questionnaire was used to obtain participants' information on knowledge, utilization, and predictors of nonpharmacological pain relief measures. Results: Although 41 (61.2%) of the participants had knowledge about nonpharmacological pain relief measures, few did not know some of the cognitive-behavioral and environmental measures in labor pain management. There was 35.8% (24/67) for utilization of cognitive-behavioral measures and 55.2% (37/67) for psychological/emotional measures for labor pain management by respondents, respectively. Fifty (74.6%) of respondents agreed that predictors such as lack of knowledge, lack of updates and training, work experience, best practice guidelines, and equipment were hindrances to utilization. There was statistically significance in relationship between the level of knowledge and utilization of nonpharmacological pain relief measures (r = 0.6, P < 0.05). Conclusion: The utilization of nonpharmacological measures for labor pain management is low, thus it is recommended that frequent education, training updates on effective labor pain management, provision of clinical guidelines on labor pain management, and enrichment of midwifery training curriculum are imperative to ensure quality labor pain management and positive health outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产士利用非药物镇痛措施进行分娩疼痛管理:一项描述性横断面研究
目的:本研究旨在调查助产士在分娩疼痛管理中使用非药物镇痛措施的情况,并测试助产士的知识与尼日利亚克罗斯河州卡拉巴尔二级卫生机构分娩疼痛管理中使用非药物镇痛措施之间的关系。材料与方法:本研究采用描述性横断面设计。这项研究植根于凯瑟琳·科尔卡巴的舒适理论。采用有目的抽样技术,共招募了67名参与者。采用自制的结构化问卷,了解参与者对非药物镇痛措施的知识、使用情况和预测因素。结果:41名(61.2%)的参与者了解非药物镇痛措施,但很少有人不知道分娩疼痛管理中的认知行为和环境措施。有35.8%(24/67)的受访者使用认知行为措施,55.2%(37/67)的受访者使用心理/情绪措施来管理分娩疼痛。50(74.6%)的受访者同意,缺乏知识、缺乏更新和培训、工作经验、最佳实践指南和设备等预测因素是利用的障碍。患者对非药物镇痛措施的认知程度与使用程度之间存在统计学意义(r = 0.6, P < 0.05)。结论:非药物措施对分娩疼痛管理的利用率较低,因此建议经常进行有效分娩疼痛管理的教育和培训,提供分娩疼痛管理的临床指南,丰富助产培训课程,以确保分娩疼痛管理的质量和积极的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrative Nursing
Journal of Integrative Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heart failure symptom burden, dietary intake, and inflammation: An integrative review of the literature. Prevalence of social media addiction among nursing sstudents Intensive care environment: Perspective of relatives of critically ill patient sustained by health technology Technical operation specification for cupping therapy Impact of designed infection control educational program on nurses' knowledge and compliance with standard precautions at maternity hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1