{"title":"Late postoperative opacification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.","authors":"Hakan E Oner, I. Durak, O. Saatçi","doi":"10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE\nTo evaluate the incidence of postoperative opacification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and discuss the surgical management.\n\n\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\nSeventy-two eyes of 72 consecutive patients who received the same type of hydrophilic acrylic IOL (Intraocular Optical International, I.O.I., California, USA) after uneventful phacoemulsification were evaluated retrospectively. Systemic status, follow-up time, recognition time of IOL opacification, time lapse between implantation and explantation, and surgical technique during explantation were reported.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIOL opacification was noted in 3 patients (4.1%). Time lapse between implantation and first recognition of opacification was 6.3+/-1.5 months (range: 5-8 months). Two of the patients had insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and both were on renal dialysis for diabetic nephropathy, whereas one had no systemic disease. Opacified hydrophilic acrylic IOLs were exchanged with Acrysof IOL, and no further opacification occurred after lens exchange.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nUse caution on implantation of hydrophilic IOLs because late opacification is a serious complication requiring further surgery.","PeriodicalId":19509,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","volume":"12 1","pages":"304-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1542-8877-20020701-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the incidence of postoperative opacification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and discuss the surgical management.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Seventy-two eyes of 72 consecutive patients who received the same type of hydrophilic acrylic IOL (Intraocular Optical International, I.O.I., California, USA) after uneventful phacoemulsification were evaluated retrospectively. Systemic status, follow-up time, recognition time of IOL opacification, time lapse between implantation and explantation, and surgical technique during explantation were reported.
RESULTS
IOL opacification was noted in 3 patients (4.1%). Time lapse between implantation and first recognition of opacification was 6.3+/-1.5 months (range: 5-8 months). Two of the patients had insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and both were on renal dialysis for diabetic nephropathy, whereas one had no systemic disease. Opacified hydrophilic acrylic IOLs were exchanged with Acrysof IOL, and no further opacification occurred after lens exchange.
CONCLUSION
Use caution on implantation of hydrophilic IOLs because late opacification is a serious complication requiring further surgery.