Investigation of the effects of bimaxillary surgery on the pharyngeal airway space

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.4
E. Koç, Atılım Akkurt
{"title":"Investigation of the effects of bimaxillary surgery on the pharyngeal airway space","authors":"E. Koç, Atılım Akkurt","doi":"10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To examine the pharyngeal airway space (PAS) changes in patients with skeletal Class III anomalies treated with two different bimaxillary surgery (BMS) techniques.\nMethodology: A total of 27 patients (15 females, 12 males) treated with BMS were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=16, mean age: 20.67±2.82 years) consisted of patients who underwent maxillary-mandibular advancement (MMA), and Group 2 (n=11, mean age: 23.87±7.72 years) consisted of patients who underwent maxillary advancement and mandibular setback (MAMS). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) records were taken immediately before (T1) and at least 5 months after (T2) BMS. To evaluate the postoperative PAS changes, the parameters of total volume (TV), upper volume (UV), lower volume (LV), and minimal axial area (Min-Ax) were evaluated using NemoCeph 10.4.2 software.\nResults: In Group 1, postoperative increases in the TV, NV, OV, and Min-Ax were determined as 4.5%, 6.6%, 3.07%, and 5.1%, respectively, but these increases were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In Group 2, the following increases were determined: 10.4% in TV, 18.4% in NV, and 5.5% in OV. A postoperative decrease of 6.2% was determined for Min-Ax. These increases and decreases were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 in any pre- and postoperative parameters (p > 0.05).\nConclusion: Neither of the BMS techniques caused any significant change in the PAS parameters.\n \nHow to cite this article: \nKoç E, Akkurt A. Investigation of the effects of bimaxillary surgery on the pharyngeal airway space. Int Dent Res 2022;12(3):130-6. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.4\n \nLinguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.","PeriodicalId":31322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To examine the pharyngeal airway space (PAS) changes in patients with skeletal Class III anomalies treated with two different bimaxillary surgery (BMS) techniques. Methodology: A total of 27 patients (15 females, 12 males) treated with BMS were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=16, mean age: 20.67±2.82 years) consisted of patients who underwent maxillary-mandibular advancement (MMA), and Group 2 (n=11, mean age: 23.87±7.72 years) consisted of patients who underwent maxillary advancement and mandibular setback (MAMS). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) records were taken immediately before (T1) and at least 5 months after (T2) BMS. To evaluate the postoperative PAS changes, the parameters of total volume (TV), upper volume (UV), lower volume (LV), and minimal axial area (Min-Ax) were evaluated using NemoCeph 10.4.2 software. Results: In Group 1, postoperative increases in the TV, NV, OV, and Min-Ax were determined as 4.5%, 6.6%, 3.07%, and 5.1%, respectively, but these increases were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In Group 2, the following increases were determined: 10.4% in TV, 18.4% in NV, and 5.5% in OV. A postoperative decrease of 6.2% was determined for Min-Ax. These increases and decreases were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 in any pre- and postoperative parameters (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Neither of the BMS techniques caused any significant change in the PAS parameters.   How to cite this article: Koç E, Akkurt A. Investigation of the effects of bimaxillary surgery on the pharyngeal airway space. Int Dent Res 2022;12(3):130-6. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.4   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双颌手术对咽气道间隙影响的研究
目的:探讨两种不同的双颌手术(BMS)治疗骨骼III类异常患者咽气道间隙(PAS)的变化。方法:将27例BMS患者(女性15例,男性12例)分为两组:1组(n=16,平均年龄:20.67±2.82岁)为上颌-下颌前进(MMA)患者;2组(n=11,平均年龄:23.87±7.72岁)为上颌前进-下颌后退(MAMS)患者。锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)记录立即在(T1)和(T2) BMS后至少5个月。采用NemoCeph 10.4.2软件评估术后PAS的总容积(TV)、上容积(UV)、下容积(LV)、最小轴向面积(Min-Ax)等参数。结果:组1术后TV、NV、OV、Min-Ax分别升高4.5%、6.6%、3.07%、5.1%,但均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。在第2组中,TV增加10.4%,NV增加18.4%,OV增加5.5%。Min-Ax术后降低6.2%。这些升高和降低均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。1组与2组术后各项指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论:两种BMS技术均未引起PAS参数的显著变化。本文来源:Koç E, Akkurt A.双颌手术对咽气道间隙影响的研究。国际医学杂志,2016;12(3):130-6。https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2022.vol12.no3.4语言修改:本手稿中的英语已由至少两名专业编辑检查,他们都是英语母语者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the accuracy of intraoral scanners used in single-unit implant prosthesis construction Evaluation of the buccal bone thickness in the anterior maxillary region using cone-beam computed tomography Evaluation of the alveolar bone and lingual concavity in the posterior mandibular region based on cone-beam computed tomography data Evaluation of the effect of class II fixed orthodontic treatment on the periradicular bone structure of endodontically treated mandibular molar teeth using fractal dimension analysis Analyzing biomimetic dentistry YouTube videos' quality and content
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1