More than a number – time to implement agreed psychological outcomes for infertility clinics

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/0167482X.2022.2033406
J. Quinlivan, M. P. Lambregtse-van den Berg
{"title":"More than a number – time to implement agreed psychological outcomes for infertility clinics","authors":"J. Quinlivan, M. P. Lambregtse-van den Berg","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2022.2033406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many infertility clinics proudly publish their conception rates and some also publish live birth rates, an outcome of greater relevance to consumers. However, perhaps it is time for infertility services to also publish agreed psychological outcomes as well. Infertility stigma is an increasingly recognized phenomenon and affects quality of life [1]. A study by Jing et al. published in this edition demonstrates that feelings of stigma related to infertility are associated with poorer quality of life [1]. Yet, these feelings can be easily detected and alleviated through education and counseling. The process of infertility treatment itself can also impact adversely on couples and result in sexual relations and intimacy becoming a sacrificed tool for fertility and not a key aspect of dyadic relationship bonding [2]. The stress of infertility as couples navigate diagnosis and interventions to achieve their reproductive goal can adversely impact upon sexual satisfaction [2]. Counseling and education provided by infertility centers should therefore also address more than understanding of the processes involved in therapy, but extend into psychological and sexual education to address holistic quality of life. Further, within the cohorts of couples seeking infertility care are those with particular reproductive trauma. Recurrent pregnancy loss, raised and dashed hopes, can make some couples especially vulnerable to the rigors of infertility treatment [3]. These couples can also be identified with directed screening and interventions can improve their long term outcomes. It is time to think beyond numbers as a measure of success in the field of infertility care. Clinics should also be ranked on their capacity to educate and counsel and to identify those who would benefit from additional supports. Agreed patient-endorsed psychological and quality of life outcomes support should be developed and added to the mandatory reporting of infertility services to ensure individuals and couples achieve their reproductive goals and do so whilst retaining their dyadic intimacy and quality of life.","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"37 1","pages":"1 - 1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2022.2033406","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Many infertility clinics proudly publish their conception rates and some also publish live birth rates, an outcome of greater relevance to consumers. However, perhaps it is time for infertility services to also publish agreed psychological outcomes as well. Infertility stigma is an increasingly recognized phenomenon and affects quality of life [1]. A study by Jing et al. published in this edition demonstrates that feelings of stigma related to infertility are associated with poorer quality of life [1]. Yet, these feelings can be easily detected and alleviated through education and counseling. The process of infertility treatment itself can also impact adversely on couples and result in sexual relations and intimacy becoming a sacrificed tool for fertility and not a key aspect of dyadic relationship bonding [2]. The stress of infertility as couples navigate diagnosis and interventions to achieve their reproductive goal can adversely impact upon sexual satisfaction [2]. Counseling and education provided by infertility centers should therefore also address more than understanding of the processes involved in therapy, but extend into psychological and sexual education to address holistic quality of life. Further, within the cohorts of couples seeking infertility care are those with particular reproductive trauma. Recurrent pregnancy loss, raised and dashed hopes, can make some couples especially vulnerable to the rigors of infertility treatment [3]. These couples can also be identified with directed screening and interventions can improve their long term outcomes. It is time to think beyond numbers as a measure of success in the field of infertility care. Clinics should also be ranked on their capacity to educate and counsel and to identify those who would benefit from additional supports. Agreed patient-endorsed psychological and quality of life outcomes support should be developed and added to the mandatory reporting of infertility services to ensure individuals and couples achieve their reproductive goals and do so whilst retaining their dyadic intimacy and quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多次为不孕不育诊所实施商定的心理治疗结果
许多不孕不育诊所自豪地公布他们的受孕率,有些还公布活产率,这是与消费者更相关的结果。然而,也许是时候让不孕不育服务也公布商定的心理结果了。不孕症耻感是一种越来越被认可的现象,并影响生活质量[1]。Jing等在本期发表的一项研究表明,不孕不育相关的耻辱感与较差的生活质量相关[1]。然而,这些感觉很容易被发现,并通过教育和咨询来缓解。不孕症治疗过程本身也会对夫妻产生不利影响,导致性关系和亲密关系成为生育的牺牲工具,而不是二元关系的关键方面[2]。夫妻在进行诊断和干预以实现生殖目标时,不孕症的压力会对性满意度产生不利影响[2]。因此,不孕不育中心提供的咨询和教育不仅要了解治疗过程,还要扩展到心理和性教育,以解决整体生活质量问题。此外,在寻求不孕症治疗的夫妇群体中,有特殊生殖创伤的夫妇。反复的妊娠失败,希望的升起和破灭,使一些夫妇特别容易受到不孕症治疗的严酷考验[3]。这些夫妇也可以通过定向筛查和干预来确定,可以改善他们的长期结果。是时候把数字作为衡量不孕不育护理领域成功与否的标准了。还应根据诊所的教育和咨询能力以及确定哪些人将受益于额外支助的能力对其进行排名。应制定商定的患者认可的心理和生活质量结果支持,并将其添加到不孕症服务的强制性报告中,以确保个人和夫妇实现其生殖目标,同时保持他们的亲密关系和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology was founded in 1982 in order to provide a scientific forum for obstetricians, gynecologists, psychiatrists and psychologists, academic health professionals as well as for all those who are interested in the psychosocial and psychosomatic aspects of women’s health. Another of its aims is to stimulate obstetricians and gynecologists to pay more attention to this very important facet of their profession.
期刊最新文献
Retracted article: The effects of fish oil omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on mental health parameters and metabolic status of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Effect of social support on fetal movement self-monitoring behavior in Chinese women: a moderated mediation model of health beliefs. The role and outcomes of music therapy during pregnancy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Assessment of factors related to poly cystic ovarian syndrome - A comparative and correlational study. Investigating socioeconomic disparities of Kangaroo mother care on preterm infant health outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1