Exploring the Ranking, Classifications and Evolution Mechanisms of Research Fronts: A Method Based on Multiattribute Decision Making and Clustering

Kai Xiong, Yucheng Dong, Zhaoxia Guo, F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma
{"title":"Exploring the Ranking, Classifications and Evolution Mechanisms of Research Fronts: A Method Based on Multiattribute Decision Making and Clustering","authors":"Kai Xiong, Yucheng Dong, Zhaoxia Guo, F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma","doi":"10.1142/s0219622022300038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This study aims to present a multiattribute decision making and clustering method to explore the ranking, classifications and evolution mechanisms of the research fronts in the Web of Science Essential Science Indicators (ESI) database. First, bibliometrics are used to reveal the characteristics of the 57 ESI research fronts with more than 40 ESI highly cited papers (ESI-HCPs). Second, the 8 representative indicators are discovered to get answers to the following two questions: (i) who publishes ESI-HCPs to form a research front? and (ii) where citations to these ESI-HCPs come from in a research front? Next, we investigate the ranking and clusters among the 57 ESI research fronts and uncover the evolution process of the research fronts in different clusters based on these representative indicators. We also compare the performances of different countries in these research fronts, and find that the USA and China are the leading countries in most research fronts. However, the two countries behave differently at different levels with regard to the rankings, the classifications and the evolution.","PeriodicalId":13527,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622022300038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This study aims to present a multiattribute decision making and clustering method to explore the ranking, classifications and evolution mechanisms of the research fronts in the Web of Science Essential Science Indicators (ESI) database. First, bibliometrics are used to reveal the characteristics of the 57 ESI research fronts with more than 40 ESI highly cited papers (ESI-HCPs). Second, the 8 representative indicators are discovered to get answers to the following two questions: (i) who publishes ESI-HCPs to form a research front? and (ii) where citations to these ESI-HCPs come from in a research front? Next, we investigate the ranking and clusters among the 57 ESI research fronts and uncover the evolution process of the research fronts in different clusters based on these representative indicators. We also compare the performances of different countries in these research fronts, and find that the USA and China are the leading countries in most research fronts. However, the two countries behave differently at different levels with regard to the rankings, the classifications and the evolution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多属性决策和聚类的研究前沿排序、分类和进化机制研究
本研究旨在提出一种多属性决策聚类方法,探讨Web of Science Essential Science Indicators (ESI)数据库中研究前沿的排序、分类及其演化机制。首先,采用文献计量学方法对57个ESI研究前沿的40多篇ESI高被引论文(ESI- hcps)进行特征分析。其次,发现8个具有代表性的指标,得到以下两个问题的答案:(i)谁出版ESI-HCPs以形成研究前沿?(ii)这些esi - hcp在研究前沿的引用来自哪里?接下来,我们对57个ESI研究前沿的排名和集群进行了研究,并基于这些代表性指标揭示了不同集群中研究前沿的演变过程。我们还比较了不同国家在这些研究领域的表现,发现美国和中国在大多数研究领域处于领先地位。然而,在排名、分类和演变方面,两国在不同层次上的表现不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Guest Editors' Introduction for the Special Issue on The Role of Decision Making to Overcome COVID-19 The Behavioral TOPSIS Based on Prospect Theory and Regret Theory Instigating the Sailfish Optimization Algorithm Based on Opposition-Based Learning to Determine the Salient Features From a High-Dimensional Dataset Optimized Deep Learning-Enabled Hybrid Logistic Piece-Wise Chaotic Map for Secured Medical Data Storage System A Typology Scheme for the Criteria Weighting Methods in MADM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1