Users’ Perception of Environmental Sanitation Exercise in Selected Market in Nigeria Cities

Fagbemi Kb, Ogungbemi Ao, Philips Oo, B. Obatuase, Hassan Yo
{"title":"Users’ Perception of Environmental Sanitation Exercise in Selected Market in Nigeria Cities","authors":"Fagbemi Kb, Ogungbemi Ao, Philips Oo, B. Obatuase, Hassan Yo","doi":"10.35248/2252-5211.20.10.378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the factors influencing users’ participation in the conduct of environmental sanitation exercise in Selected Cities of Nigeria, with a view of providing information that could enhance users’’ participation in the exercise in the study area. 214 questionnaire was randomly administered among the market users’ out of which 205 was retrieved. The result of the findings shown that the means of waste disposal used by respondents were nearby gutter/space (1.5%), by burning (2.9%), use of designated dumpsite (19.0%) waste collection service (73.7%) and (34.6%) of the respondents pays N251-N300, (10.2%) pay between N50- N100 naira, 8.3% of respondents’ pays N101-N150, (24.4%) pays N151-N200, (13.2%) pays N351 above and (7.3%) pays between N201-N250 naira over the same period. In respect to regularity (7.3%) declared that supply of water is very regular, (49.8%), just regular, (21.0%) irregular, (13.7%) very irregular and (8.3%) no supply of water at all. The types of toilet used by respondents are water closet (57.1%), pit latrine (24.4%), bucket latrine (9.3%), pour-flush (2.9%) and other like ventilated improved toilet constitute (6.3%). The study concluded that environmental sanitation practices go beyond sweeping of market environment and that while environmental sanitation facilities in the market are acceptably insufficient, the existing ones are wrongly managed and not exploited prudently.","PeriodicalId":14393,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Waste Resources","volume":"32 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Waste Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2252-5211.20.10.378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study examined the factors influencing users’ participation in the conduct of environmental sanitation exercise in Selected Cities of Nigeria, with a view of providing information that could enhance users’’ participation in the exercise in the study area. 214 questionnaire was randomly administered among the market users’ out of which 205 was retrieved. The result of the findings shown that the means of waste disposal used by respondents were nearby gutter/space (1.5%), by burning (2.9%), use of designated dumpsite (19.0%) waste collection service (73.7%) and (34.6%) of the respondents pays N251-N300, (10.2%) pay between N50- N100 naira, 8.3% of respondents’ pays N101-N150, (24.4%) pays N151-N200, (13.2%) pays N351 above and (7.3%) pays between N201-N250 naira over the same period. In respect to regularity (7.3%) declared that supply of water is very regular, (49.8%), just regular, (21.0%) irregular, (13.7%) very irregular and (8.3%) no supply of water at all. The types of toilet used by respondents are water closet (57.1%), pit latrine (24.4%), bucket latrine (9.3%), pour-flush (2.9%) and other like ventilated improved toilet constitute (6.3%). The study concluded that environmental sanitation practices go beyond sweeping of market environment and that while environmental sanitation facilities in the market are acceptably insufficient, the existing ones are wrongly managed and not exploited prudently.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚城市选定市场用户对环境卫生运动的感知
这项研究审查了在尼日利亚选定城市影响用户参与开展环境卫生活动的因素,以期提供信息,提高用户在研究地区参与活动的程度。随机抽取市场用户问卷214份,回收205份。调查结果表明,受访者使用的垃圾处理方式是附近排水沟/空间(1.5%),焚烧(2.9%),使用指定垃圾场(19.0%)废物收集服务(73.7%),(34.6%)的受访者支付251- n300,(10.2%)支付50- N100奈拉,8.3%的受访者支付101- n150奈拉,(24.4%)支付151- n200奈拉,(13.2%)支付351奈拉以上,(7.3%)支付201- n250奈拉。对于供水是否正常(7.3%),回答“很正常”(49.8%)、“正常”(21.0%)、“不正常”(13.7%)、“非常不正常”(8.3%)。受访者使用的厕所类型为抽水马桶(57.1%)、坑式厕所(24.4%)、斗式厕所(9.3%)、抽水马桶(2.9%)和其他类似通风改进型厕所构成(6.3%)。研究的结论是,环境卫生实践不仅仅是清扫市场环境,市场环境卫生设施不足是可以接受的,但现有的环境卫生设施管理不当,没有谨慎利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drainage System Sustainability in Bodity town, Southern Ethiopia Wastewater Did Not Significantly Alter Seismic Stress Direction in Southern Kansas, Study Finds Fly Ash F Morphology and Particle Surface Modification via Mechanical Activation Applying Circular Economy in Municipal Waste Management by Optimal Approach of Game Theory Groundwater Management in India: Problems and Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1