Effect of veneering material and technique on the fracture resistance of porcelain-veneered zirconia crowns

Yousif Ezzat, M. Al-Rafee
{"title":"Effect of veneering material and technique on the fracture resistance of porcelain-veneered zirconia crowns","authors":"Yousif Ezzat, M. Al-Rafee","doi":"10.4103/sjos.SJOralSci_69_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Different porcelain veneering materials and techniques are used for the fabrication of porcelain-veneered zirconia crowns. Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of different veneering materials and techniques (layering or over pressing) on the fracture resistance of zirconia-based crowns. Materials and Methods: A prepared molar tooth was scanned using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology to create a master metal die. The scanned dies was used to produce forty zirconia copings. The zirconia copings were divided into four groups (n = 10) based on the veneering technique used, as follows: over pressing using Cercon Ceram press (PR1), IPS e.max ZirPress (PR2), layering using IPS e.max Ceram (LR1), and VITAVM9 (LR2). All crowns were cemented using glass-ionomer cement and thermocycled for 3000 cycles, between 5°C and 55°C. They were then loaded using a universal testing machine (3.7-mm ball and 0.5-mm/min crosshead speed) until failure. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons was used for the statistical analyses. Results: The means and standard deviations for failure loads were 1420 ± 54 N, 1797 ± 31 N, 1698 ± 36 N, and 2120 ± 73 N for the PR1, PR2, LR1, and LR2 groups, respectively. The differences in failure loads were statistically significant (P < 0.05) among the different test groups. Failure was predominantly due to adhesive failure in the PR1 and PR2 groups, whereas core fracture occurred more often in the LRI and LR2 groups. Conclusion: The fracture resistance of zirconia-based crowns was affected by the veneering materials and techniques used.","PeriodicalId":32335,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"55 1","pages":"11 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjos.SJOralSci_69_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Context: Different porcelain veneering materials and techniques are used for the fabrication of porcelain-veneered zirconia crowns. Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of different veneering materials and techniques (layering or over pressing) on the fracture resistance of zirconia-based crowns. Materials and Methods: A prepared molar tooth was scanned using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology to create a master metal die. The scanned dies was used to produce forty zirconia copings. The zirconia copings were divided into four groups (n = 10) based on the veneering technique used, as follows: over pressing using Cercon Ceram press (PR1), IPS e.max ZirPress (PR2), layering using IPS e.max Ceram (LR1), and VITAVM9 (LR2). All crowns were cemented using glass-ionomer cement and thermocycled for 3000 cycles, between 5°C and 55°C. They were then loaded using a universal testing machine (3.7-mm ball and 0.5-mm/min crosshead speed) until failure. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons was used for the statistical analyses. Results: The means and standard deviations for failure loads were 1420 ± 54 N, 1797 ± 31 N, 1698 ± 36 N, and 2120 ± 73 N for the PR1, PR2, LR1, and LR2 groups, respectively. The differences in failure loads were statistically significant (P < 0.05) among the different test groups. Failure was predominantly due to adhesive failure in the PR1 and PR2 groups, whereas core fracture occurred more often in the LRI and LR2 groups. Conclusion: The fracture resistance of zirconia-based crowns was affected by the veneering materials and techniques used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贴面材料和贴面工艺对瓷贴面氧化锆冠抗断裂性能的影响
背景:不同的瓷贴面材料和技术被用于制造瓷贴面氧化锆冠。目的:本研究的目的是研究不同贴面材料和技术(分层或过压)对氧化锆基冠抗断裂性的影响。材料与方法:采用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造技术对制备好的磨牙进行扫描,制作金属母模。扫描后的模具被用来生产40个氧化锆覆层。根据所采用的贴面技术将氧化锆覆层分为4组(n = 10),分别为:Cercon Ceram压片(PR1)、IPS e.max ZirPress压片(PR2)、IPS e.max Ceram分层(LR1)和VITAVM9 (LR2)。所有冠均使用玻璃离子水泥进行胶结,并在5°C至55°C之间进行3000次热循环。然后使用通用试验机(3.7 mm球,0.5 mm/min十字速度)加载直至失效。采用Bonferroni校正的单因素方差分析进行统计分析。结果:PR1、PR2、LR1和LR2组的失效载荷均值和标准差分别为1420±54 N、1797±31 N、1698±36 N和2120±73 N。各试验组失效载荷差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在PR1和PR2组中,失败主要是由于粘接剂失效,而在LRI和LR2组中更常发生核心骨折。结论:氧化锆基冠的抗断裂性能受冠体贴面材料和贴面工艺的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of alveolar bone level after orthodontic clear aligners treatment: A retrospective study Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding artificial intelligence in histopathology: A cross-sectional study among oral pathologists in India Cross-sectional survey of resin-modified glass ionomer as dental restoration in Saudi Arabia Mandibular actinomyces osteomyelitis A comparative clinical evaluation of plaque removal efficacy of a chewable toothpaste tablet with conventional toothpaste in children – A randomized clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1