Can Board Diversity Promote Dividend Policy? Seeking The Role of Profitability

Muhammad Taufik, J. Jessica, Nicken Destriana
{"title":"Can Board Diversity Promote Dividend Policy? Seeking The Role of Profitability","authors":"Muhammad Taufik, J. Jessica, Nicken Destriana","doi":"10.34208/jba.v24i2.1623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the effect of the board of directors (BOD) diversity on dividend policy and how the implications of profitability are treated as moderation. Dividend policy and BOD characteristics have been studied extensively; however, the profitability role being moderating variable and BOD diversity are challenging. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is one of the first to examine profitability as moderation. BOD diversity includes gender, age, education level, accounting expertise, and nationality. The research period spanned 2017-2020, where the number of samples was 370 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, resulting in 1,480 data. The regression model used is panel data. Overall, BOD gender, education level, and nationality are homogeneous, where female directors, directors with master's education, and foreign directors have a small proportion. As a result, they have no significant effect in promoting dividends. In addition, profitability cannot influence the relationship between board gender and board nationality on dividends. Nevertheless, profitability moderates the relationship between board nationality and dividend policy to a significant negative. Further, board age and accounting expertise positively and significantly affect dividend policy, and the results are identical when moderated by profitability. The proportion of board expertise expressed is heterogeneous, and the board age of 52 years is categorized as old, while they mitigate agency conflict. Thus, companies are required to maintain these proportions. However, companies must remedy the recruitment system to accommodate more female directors, directors with higher education at the master's level, and foreign directors. The government must also refer to regulations in developed and developing countries that establish a minimum quota for the presence of female directors.","PeriodicalId":31181,"journal":{"name":"InFestasi Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InFestasi Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34208/jba.v24i2.1623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of the board of directors (BOD) diversity on dividend policy and how the implications of profitability are treated as moderation. Dividend policy and BOD characteristics have been studied extensively; however, the profitability role being moderating variable and BOD diversity are challenging. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is one of the first to examine profitability as moderation. BOD diversity includes gender, age, education level, accounting expertise, and nationality. The research period spanned 2017-2020, where the number of samples was 370 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, resulting in 1,480 data. The regression model used is panel data. Overall, BOD gender, education level, and nationality are homogeneous, where female directors, directors with master's education, and foreign directors have a small proportion. As a result, they have no significant effect in promoting dividends. In addition, profitability cannot influence the relationship between board gender and board nationality on dividends. Nevertheless, profitability moderates the relationship between board nationality and dividend policy to a significant negative. Further, board age and accounting expertise positively and significantly affect dividend policy, and the results are identical when moderated by profitability. The proportion of board expertise expressed is heterogeneous, and the board age of 52 years is categorized as old, while they mitigate agency conflict. Thus, companies are required to maintain these proportions. However, companies must remedy the recruitment system to accommodate more female directors, directors with higher education at the master's level, and foreign directors. The government must also refer to regulations in developed and developing countries that establish a minimum quota for the presence of female directors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
董事会多元化能促进股利政策吗?寻求盈利能力的作用
本研究探讨董事会(BOD)多样性对股利政策的影响,以及盈利能力的影响如何被视为适度。股利政策和BOD特征已被广泛研究;然而,盈利能力作为调节变量和BOD多样性具有挑战性。据作者所知,这项研究是第一个将盈利能力作为调节因素进行检验的研究之一。董事多样性包括性别、年龄、教育程度、会计专业知识和国籍。研究时间跨度为2017-2020年,样本数量为370家在印尼证券交易所上市的公司,得到1480个数据。使用的回归模型是面板数据。总体而言,董事性别、受教育程度、国籍同质化,女性董事、硕士以上学历董事、外籍董事所占比例较小。因此,它们对股息的促进作用并不显著。此外,盈利能力不能影响董事会性别和董事会国籍的关系对股息的影响。然而,盈利能力将董事会国籍与股利政策之间的关系调节为显著的负向关系。此外,董事会年龄和会计专业知识对股息政策有显著的正向影响,当受盈利能力调节时,结果是相同的。董事会专业知识的表达比例是异质的,董事会年龄为52岁被归类为老年,但他们缓解了代理冲突。因此,公司被要求保持这些比例。但是,企业必须改善招聘制度,以容纳更多的女性董事、硕士以上学历的董事和外国董事。政府还必须参照发达国家和发展中国家规定的女性董事人数的最低限额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pengaruh Tangible, Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, dan Emphaty Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Perempuan Pada Osbond Gym Palembang Penerapan Theory Planned Behavior Dalam Memprediksi Revisit Intention Lokasi Wisata di Pulau Ambon Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Housekeeping Terhadap Tingkat Kepuasan Tamu di Hotel Shofa Marwah Palembang The Investment Decision on Generation Z in Pontianak Pengaruh Leader Member Exchange (LMX) Terhadap Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) Dengan Dimediasi Motivasi Kerja Karyawan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1