Comparing online cognitive behavioural therapy versus online positive psychotherapy, well-being theory (PERMA)on test anxiety of online learning students: A randomised control study.

Fataneh Alibak, Morteza Alibak
{"title":"Comparing online cognitive behavioural therapy versus online positive psychotherapy, well-being theory (PERMA)on test anxiety of online learning students: A randomised control study.","authors":"Fataneh Alibak, Morteza Alibak","doi":"10.30688/JANZSSA.2021.1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare the efficacy of test anxiety interventions using internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and internet-based positive psychotherapy (PERMA model). Changes in test anxiety responses were evaluated in 48 online postgraduate students who met diagnostic criteria based on DSM-5 and were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (n=16), internet-based positive psychotherapy (n=16) and a control group (n=16) over three phases: pre-test, post-test and follow-up. Assessments included a self-report questionnaire and a diagnostic interview. An 18-item self-report of the Online Test Anxiety Inventory(OTAI) was used with a high internal consistency (α=0.91) to assess test anxiety of online learning students. The OTAI consists of three factors: online, psychological, and physiological. The analysis of test anxiety by repeated measure ANOVA revealed a significant decrease of anxiety in both treatment groups while no significant change was observed in the control group. The study supports using internet-based psychological interventions for the treatment of test anxiety, which is particularly significant during the COVID-19 restricted teaching environment.","PeriodicalId":39085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association","volume":"1 1","pages":"6-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30688/JANZSSA.2021.1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study aims to compare the efficacy of test anxiety interventions using internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and internet-based positive psychotherapy (PERMA model). Changes in test anxiety responses were evaluated in 48 online postgraduate students who met diagnostic criteria based on DSM-5 and were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (n=16), internet-based positive psychotherapy (n=16) and a control group (n=16) over three phases: pre-test, post-test and follow-up. Assessments included a self-report questionnaire and a diagnostic interview. An 18-item self-report of the Online Test Anxiety Inventory(OTAI) was used with a high internal consistency (α=0.91) to assess test anxiety of online learning students. The OTAI consists of three factors: online, psychological, and physiological. The analysis of test anxiety by repeated measure ANOVA revealed a significant decrease of anxiety in both treatment groups while no significant change was observed in the control group. The study supports using internet-based psychological interventions for the treatment of test anxiety, which is particularly significant during the COVID-19 restricted teaching environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较在线认知行为疗法与在线积极心理疗法,幸福感理论(PERMA)对在线学习学生考试焦虑的影响:一项随机对照研究。
本研究旨在比较基于网络的认知行为疗法和基于网络的积极心理治疗(PERMA模型)干预考试焦虑的效果。对48名符合DSM-5诊断标准的在线研究生的考试焦虑反应变化进行了评估,并被随机分配到三个治疗组:基于互联网的认知行为治疗(n=16),基于互联网的积极心理治疗(n=16)和对照组(n=16),分为三个阶段:测试前、测试后和随访。评估包括自我报告问卷和诊断性访谈。采用具有高内部一致性(α=0.91)的在线考试焦虑量表(OTAI)的18项自我报告来评估在线学习学生的考试焦虑。OTAI由三个因素组成:网络、心理和生理。重复测量方差分析显示,两组患者的焦虑水平均有显著降低,而对照组无显著变化。该研究支持使用基于互联网的心理干预来治疗考试焦虑,这在受COVID-19限制的教学环境中尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Wellbeing Specialist Case Management Service Providing Support to Students in a University Setting Psychological Distress and Help-seeking Behaviour: Chinese International Students in New Zealand Developing Staff Referral Pathways to Aid in Proactive Management and Maintenance of Student Health and Wellbeing Student Affairs and Services Mediates the Context for Students’ Living, Learning, and Development: Lessons from COVID-19 Support for Students who have Experienced Bullying Because of their Race or Ethnicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1