{"title":"Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Chinese Universities: Developments and Challenges","authors":"Yutong Wang, Yingyi Ma","doi":"10.1080/10611932.2022.2136446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation and entrepreneurship are increasingly associated with economic, technological and social development (Fagerberg, Fosaas, and Sapprasert 2012; Landstr€ om, Harirchi, and Åstr€ om 2012). As countries strive to strengthen their knowledge-based economies, policymaking has focused on how innovation and entrepreneurship activities can accelerate economic growth, promote industrial upgrading and transform employment structures (Bartels et al., 2012; World Bank, 2015). Universities, as organizations dedicated to knowledge transmission, production and application, have come under heighten pressure to demonstrate their contribution in nurturing talents, spurring innovation and supporting the development of knowledge-based economies (Etzkowitz 2003; Jessop 2017). Notably, universities’ engagement with innovation and entrepreneurship is often conceptualized by the term “entrepreneurial university.” This concept refers to universities that vigorously generate additional financial resources to support their operation through commercializing knowledge, forming collaborations beyond academia, and integrating an entrepreneurial culture (Clark 2001). The “triple helix model” further highlights the need for universities to engage deeply with industry and government to propel economic and social progress (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 2000). Undoubtedly, the emergence of such concepts has changed the positioning of universities from a support structure for innovation and entrepreneurship through knowledge generation, research output and personnel training to influential actor and equal partner (Etzkowitz 2003). The provision of educational programs related to innovation and entrepreneurship in the higher education sector has attracted much attention, and there is considerable enthusiasm in university-based entrepreneurship education globally. As a result, the nature, relevance, contents, methods of implementation, and impact of entrepreneurship education have been the subject of growing academic scrutiny. Broadly speaking, entrepreneurship education consists of “any pedagogical programme or process of education for entrepreneurial attitudes and skills” (Fayolle, Gailly, and Lassas-Clerc 2006, p. 702). In practice, it often consists of three essential parts: curricula, fundamental elements, and publications (Katz 2003). More specifically, entrepreneurship education involves the design of courses and supporting infrastructure for entrepreneurial activities as well as the availability of relevant learning materials and academic research (Katz 2003). Research has demonstrated the impact of entrepreneurship education, especially its","PeriodicalId":39911,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Education and Society","volume":"69 1","pages":"225 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2022.2136446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Innovation and entrepreneurship are increasingly associated with economic, technological and social development (Fagerberg, Fosaas, and Sapprasert 2012; Landstr€ om, Harirchi, and Åstr€ om 2012). As countries strive to strengthen their knowledge-based economies, policymaking has focused on how innovation and entrepreneurship activities can accelerate economic growth, promote industrial upgrading and transform employment structures (Bartels et al., 2012; World Bank, 2015). Universities, as organizations dedicated to knowledge transmission, production and application, have come under heighten pressure to demonstrate their contribution in nurturing talents, spurring innovation and supporting the development of knowledge-based economies (Etzkowitz 2003; Jessop 2017). Notably, universities’ engagement with innovation and entrepreneurship is often conceptualized by the term “entrepreneurial university.” This concept refers to universities that vigorously generate additional financial resources to support their operation through commercializing knowledge, forming collaborations beyond academia, and integrating an entrepreneurial culture (Clark 2001). The “triple helix model” further highlights the need for universities to engage deeply with industry and government to propel economic and social progress (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 2000). Undoubtedly, the emergence of such concepts has changed the positioning of universities from a support structure for innovation and entrepreneurship through knowledge generation, research output and personnel training to influential actor and equal partner (Etzkowitz 2003). The provision of educational programs related to innovation and entrepreneurship in the higher education sector has attracted much attention, and there is considerable enthusiasm in university-based entrepreneurship education globally. As a result, the nature, relevance, contents, methods of implementation, and impact of entrepreneurship education have been the subject of growing academic scrutiny. Broadly speaking, entrepreneurship education consists of “any pedagogical programme or process of education for entrepreneurial attitudes and skills” (Fayolle, Gailly, and Lassas-Clerc 2006, p. 702). In practice, it often consists of three essential parts: curricula, fundamental elements, and publications (Katz 2003). More specifically, entrepreneurship education involves the design of courses and supporting infrastructure for entrepreneurial activities as well as the availability of relevant learning materials and academic research (Katz 2003). Research has demonstrated the impact of entrepreneurship education, especially its
创新和创业越来越多地与经济、技术和社会发展联系在一起(Fagerberg, Fosaas, and Sapprasert 2012;Landstr - om, Harirchi, and Åstr - om 2012)。随着各国努力加强知识经济,政策制定将重点放在创新和创业活动如何加速经济增长、促进产业升级和改变就业结构上(Bartels et al., 2012;世界银行,2015)。大学作为一个致力于知识传播、生产和应用的组织,在培养人才、鼓励创新和支持知识经济发展方面所做的贡献正面临着越来越大的压力(Etzkowitz 2003;Jessop 2017)。值得注意的是,大学对创新和创业的参与通常被概念化为“创业型大学”。这一概念是指大学通过将知识商业化,形成学术以外的合作,以及整合创业文化,大力产生额外的财政资源来支持其运作(Clark 2001)。“三螺旋模型”进一步强调了大学与行业和政府深入合作以推动经济和社会进步的必要性(Etzkowitz和Leydesdorff 2000)。毫无疑问,这些概念的出现改变了大学的定位,从通过知识产生、研究产出和人才培养来支持创新和创业的结构转变为有影响力的行动者和平等伙伴(Etzkowitz 2003)。在高等教育领域提供与创新创业相关的教育项目引起了人们的广泛关注,全球范围内对大学创业教育有着相当大的热情。因此,创业教育的性质、相关性、内容、实施方法和影响一直是学术界日益关注的主题。广义地说,创业教育包括“任何关于创业态度和技能的教学计划或教育过程”(Fayolle, Gailly, and Lassas-Clerc 2006,第702页)。在实践中,它通常由三个基本部分组成:课程、基本要素和出版物(Katz 2003)。更具体地说,创业教育包括为创业活动设计课程和支持基础设施,以及相关学习材料和学术研究的可用性(Katz 2003)。研究已经证明了创业教育的影响,尤其是它的
期刊介绍:
How is China"s vast population being educated in the home, the school, and the workplace? Chinese Education and Society is essential for insight into the latest Chinese thinking on educational policy and practice, educational reform and development, pedagogical theory and methods, colleges and universities, schools and families, as well as the education for diverse social groups across gender and youth, urban and rural, mainstream and minorities. It features unabridged translations of the most important articles in the field from Chinese sources, including scholarly journals and collections of articles published in book form. It also provides refereed research on specific themes.