War, peace and geography: the perilous engagement with public policy toward armed conflict

IF 2.2 Q2 GEOGRAPHY SPACE AND POLITY Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1080/13562576.2022.2118470
Judith Verweijen
{"title":"War, peace and geography: the perilous engagement with public policy toward armed conflict","authors":"Judith Verweijen","doi":"10.1080/13562576.2022.2118470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Geographers engaging with policy debates on armed conflict in the Global South are confronted with a set of difficult questions that have no satisfying answers. In this provocation, I discuss three risks that appear inherent to policy engagement in this domain: the first is contributing to reproducing rather than upending a deeply unjust and unequal world order; the second is reinforcing colonial structures and epistemologies; and the third is facilitating the weaponization of one’s research. The discomforting confrontation with these dilemmas should not deter geographers of armed conflict from contributing to public policy, because non-engagement can be equally – if not more – problematic.","PeriodicalId":46632,"journal":{"name":"SPACE AND POLITY","volume":"70 1","pages":"128 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPACE AND POLITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2022.2118470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Geographers engaging with policy debates on armed conflict in the Global South are confronted with a set of difficult questions that have no satisfying answers. In this provocation, I discuss three risks that appear inherent to policy engagement in this domain: the first is contributing to reproducing rather than upending a deeply unjust and unequal world order; the second is reinforcing colonial structures and epistemologies; and the third is facilitating the weaponization of one’s research. The discomforting confrontation with these dilemmas should not deter geographers of armed conflict from contributing to public policy, because non-engagement can be equally – if not more – problematic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战争、和平与地理:对武装冲突的公共政策的危险接触
参与全球南方武装冲突政策辩论的地理学家面临着一系列没有令人满意答案的难题。在这篇文章中,我讨论了在这一领域进行政策接触所固有的三种风险:第一种风险是助长了再现而不是颠覆一种极不公正和不平等的世界秩序;二是强化殖民结构和认识论;第三是促进研究的武器化。面对这些令人不安的困境,不应阻止研究武装冲突的地理学家为公共政策做出贡献,因为不接触可能同样——如果不是更严重的话——造成问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SPACE AND POLITY
SPACE AND POLITY GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Space & Polity is a fully refereed scholarly international journal devoted to the theoretical and empirical understanding of the changing relationships between the state, and regional and local forms of governance. The journal provides a forum aimed particularly at bringing together social scientists currently working in a variety of disciplines, including geography, political science, sociology, economics, anthropology and development studies and who have a common interest in the relationships between space, place and politics in less developed as well as the advanced economies.
期刊最新文献
Political and public engagement as topological boundary-making: a critique of ‘Deficit’ approaches in post-communist CEE On purpose: solidarity by accident or design and the generative ambiguity in between Introduction to the special issue on the geographies of populism and populist geographies Sectarian, recreational, or anti-social? Interpreting juvenile violence in post-conflict Belfast Stuck between the EU ‘rock’ and UK ‘hard place’? Northern Ireland as a liminal space after Brexit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1