Validity in interpretive methods: frameworks and innovations

M. Dutta, Satveer Kaur, Phoebe Elers
{"title":"Validity in interpretive methods: frameworks and innovations","authors":"M. Dutta, Satveer Kaur, Phoebe Elers","doi":"10.1080/23808985.2020.1792795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this review essay, we examine the various threads, debates, and dialogues around valildity in interpretive metods. We address the ways in which the question of validity have emerged in the different areas of interpretive social sciences. We then delve into future directions for conversations on validity in the interpretive social sciences. The essay wraps up by suggesting a radical politics that inverts the reductionist thread of communication, instead suggesting radical paradigm-shifting registers for conversations on the quality of interpretive accounts.","PeriodicalId":36859,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the International Communication Association","volume":"70 1","pages":"185 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the International Communication Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1792795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this review essay, we examine the various threads, debates, and dialogues around valildity in interpretive metods. We address the ways in which the question of validity have emerged in the different areas of interpretive social sciences. We then delve into future directions for conversations on validity in the interpretive social sciences. The essay wraps up by suggesting a radical politics that inverts the reductionist thread of communication, instead suggesting radical paradigm-shifting registers for conversations on the quality of interpretive accounts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解释方法的有效性:框架和创新
在这篇综述文章中,我们研究了关于解释方法有效性的各种线索、辩论和对话。我们讨论了在解释性社会科学的不同领域中有效性问题出现的方式。然后,我们将深入探讨解释性社会科学中关于有效性的对话的未来方向。文章最后提出了一种激进的政治观点,这种观点颠覆了还原论的交流思路,而是提出了一种激进的范式转换寄存器,用于讨论解释账户的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Four decades of biological measurement advancing mediated communication theory: a review of literature from 1980–2020 What is ‘Being There’? an ontology of the immersive experience Relational turbulence during family transitions: a lifespan perspective and roadmap for future research An enduring divide: revisiting the mass and family communication dichotomy and exploring paths of integration Mapping media literacy impact in the U.S.: a review of literature and call for equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1