Possibilities of Determination of Risk Elements in Alluvial Agriculture Soils in the Mže and Otava River Basins by X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry

L. Menšík, L. Hlisnikovský, L. Holík, P. Nerušil, E. Kunzová
{"title":"Possibilities of Determination of Risk Elements in Alluvial Agriculture Soils in the Mže and Otava River Basins by X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry","authors":"L. Menšík, L. Hlisnikovský, L. Holík, P. Nerušil, E. Kunzová","doi":"10.2478/agri-2020-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The undesirable, hazardous, and risk elements are introduced into all environmental parts through human activities. They enter the soil and aquatic environment by atmospheric deposition, or by application of sewage sludge, pesticides, mineral and organic fertilisers, and by organic manures. Heavy metals (HMs) and risk elements can be determined in the soil by a wide range of analytical methods that differ in terms of time and financial costs, and the demands on service. One of the methods is the use of a portable XRF spectrometer under lab conditions, offering relatively fast determination of the concentration of chemical elements in the soil. In the presented study we evaluated the accuracy and the precision of the XRF device for analysis of the concentration of heavy metals (Pb, Zn, As, Mn, Cu, and Ni) in alluvial soils from the Mže and Otava river basins (Czech Republic), and validated and compared obtained results with the conventional lab method (ICP-OES). The soil samples (n = 502) were taken at 43 sampling sites at depths of 0 – 30, 30 – 60, and 60 – 90 cm, mainly in floodplains with Fluvisol soil type (N-year flow rates = Q100 m3/s). The multiple correlation coefficients R values ranged from 0.81 to 0.99. The R2 determination coefficients for individual HMs, measured by XRF, were determined as follows: Pb – 0.98, Zn – 0.97, Cu – 0.80, Mn – 0.79, As – 0.78, Ni – 0.66. According to our results, 66 – 98% points fit the designed models. The Pb and Zn have the best dependency (relationship tightness), and regression models are excellent. Cu, Mn, and As have a slightly worse dependency (tightness of the relationship), but the regression model is still very well suitable for agriculture practice, or for the purposes of environmental monitoring.","PeriodicalId":7527,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture (Pol'nohospodárstvo)","volume":"189 1","pages":"15 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture (Pol'nohospodárstvo)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/agri-2020-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The undesirable, hazardous, and risk elements are introduced into all environmental parts through human activities. They enter the soil and aquatic environment by atmospheric deposition, or by application of sewage sludge, pesticides, mineral and organic fertilisers, and by organic manures. Heavy metals (HMs) and risk elements can be determined in the soil by a wide range of analytical methods that differ in terms of time and financial costs, and the demands on service. One of the methods is the use of a portable XRF spectrometer under lab conditions, offering relatively fast determination of the concentration of chemical elements in the soil. In the presented study we evaluated the accuracy and the precision of the XRF device for analysis of the concentration of heavy metals (Pb, Zn, As, Mn, Cu, and Ni) in alluvial soils from the Mže and Otava river basins (Czech Republic), and validated and compared obtained results with the conventional lab method (ICP-OES). The soil samples (n = 502) were taken at 43 sampling sites at depths of 0 – 30, 30 – 60, and 60 – 90 cm, mainly in floodplains with Fluvisol soil type (N-year flow rates = Q100 m3/s). The multiple correlation coefficients R values ranged from 0.81 to 0.99. The R2 determination coefficients for individual HMs, measured by XRF, were determined as follows: Pb – 0.98, Zn – 0.97, Cu – 0.80, Mn – 0.79, As – 0.78, Ni – 0.66. According to our results, 66 – 98% points fit the designed models. The Pb and Zn have the best dependency (relationship tightness), and regression models are excellent. Cu, Mn, and As have a slightly worse dependency (tightness of the relationship), but the regression model is still very well suitable for agriculture practice, or for the purposes of environmental monitoring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用x射线荧光光谱法测定Mže和奥塔瓦河流域冲积农业土壤风险要素的可能性
不良的、有害的和危险的因素是通过人类活动引入到环境的各个部分的。它们通过大气沉降或污水污泥、农药、矿物和有机肥料的施用以及有机粪肥进入土壤和水生环境。土壤中的重金属(HMs)和风险因素可以通过各种不同的分析方法来确定,这些方法在时间和财务成本以及对服务的要求方面有所不同。其中一种方法是在实验室条件下使用便携式XRF光谱仪,可以相对快速地测定土壤中化学元素的浓度。在本研究中,我们评估了XRF装置用于分析Mže和Otava河流域(捷克共和国)冲积土壤中重金属(Pb, Zn, As, Mn, Cu和Ni)浓度的准确性和精密度,并与传统实验室方法(ICP-OES)进行了验证和比较。土壤样品(n = 502)采集于深度为0 ~ 30cm、30 ~ 60cm和60 ~ 90cm的43个采样点,主要为Fluvisol土壤类型的洪泛平原(n年流量= Q100 m3/s)。多重相关系数R值为0.81 ~ 0.99。XRF测定各hm的R2决定系数为Pb - 0.98, Zn - 0.97, Cu - 0.80, Mn - 0.79, as - 0.78, Ni - 0.66。根据我们的结果,66 - 98%的点符合设计的模型。Pb和Zn的相关性(关系紧密度)最好,回归模型也很好。Cu、Mn和As的依赖性稍差(关系紧密度),但回归模型仍然非常适合农业实践或环境监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case study – The occurrence of pests in stands of newly introduced energy crops in large-scale pilot experiments in conditions of Central Europe Performance and Yield Stability of Quality Protein Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids under Rainfed Condition Superabsorbent polymer and its effect on maize germination, emergence and genetic diversity of rhizosphere microorganisms Genotype Variation of Polyphenol Content and Antioxidant Activity of Artemisia balchanorum Krasch. × Artemisia taurica Willd Nitrogen release dynamics and carbon sequestration by legume and non-legume cover crops under pure and mixed planting conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1