Competing Logics: Between Thai Sovereignty and the China Model in 2018

Gregory V. Raymond
{"title":"Competing Logics: Between Thai Sovereignty and the China Model in 2018","authors":"Gregory V. Raymond","doi":"10.1355/9789814843164-022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In September 2018 a quarrel between a Thai border guard and a tourist from the People’s Republic of China at Bangkok’s Don Mueang Airport turned violent. The argument took place after the Chinese visitor was denied entry on the grounds that he could not produce evidence that he would return to China after his trip to Thailand. The incident should be worrying for Thailand, given the country’s increasing reliance on the growing numbers of Chinese tourists since the coup of 2014. Yet this incident is also symbolic of the internal pressure generated within the Thai state as a result of having to manage China’s encroachments on Thai sovereignty. In 2018 the Thai military government struggled to maintain a balance between two opposing policy logics. On the one hand, China has become not just a critical economic partner but also a potential model of governance; on the other, Thailand’s resilient strategic culture and national identity each emphasize sovereignty and independence, requiring judicious diplomacy with the great powers as the primary tool to achieve these ends. Clearly, there is a tension here: while Thailand may find the stability of authoritarian capitalism attractive, it no more wants coercion from China than it does from the United States. In this chapter I assess the extent to which 2018 may have seen the highwater mark of Thailand’s embrace of China and its adoption of the China","PeriodicalId":21900,"journal":{"name":"Southeast Asian Affairs","volume":"83 1","pages":"341 - 358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeast Asian Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814843164-022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In September 2018 a quarrel between a Thai border guard and a tourist from the People’s Republic of China at Bangkok’s Don Mueang Airport turned violent. The argument took place after the Chinese visitor was denied entry on the grounds that he could not produce evidence that he would return to China after his trip to Thailand. The incident should be worrying for Thailand, given the country’s increasing reliance on the growing numbers of Chinese tourists since the coup of 2014. Yet this incident is also symbolic of the internal pressure generated within the Thai state as a result of having to manage China’s encroachments on Thai sovereignty. In 2018 the Thai military government struggled to maintain a balance between two opposing policy logics. On the one hand, China has become not just a critical economic partner but also a potential model of governance; on the other, Thailand’s resilient strategic culture and national identity each emphasize sovereignty and independence, requiring judicious diplomacy with the great powers as the primary tool to achieve these ends. Clearly, there is a tension here: while Thailand may find the stability of authoritarian capitalism attractive, it no more wants coercion from China than it does from the United States. In this chapter I assess the extent to which 2018 may have seen the highwater mark of Thailand’s embrace of China and its adoption of the China
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竞争逻辑:2018年泰国主权与中国模式之争
2018年9月,一名泰国边防警卫和一名来自中华人民共和国的游客在曼谷廊曼机场发生争吵,最终演变成暴力冲突。这名中国游客被拒绝入境,理由是他无法提供证据证明自己在泰国之行结束后会返回中国。鉴于泰国自2014年政变以来越来越依赖数量不断增长的中国游客,这起事件应该引起泰国的担忧。然而,这一事件也象征着,由于不得不应对中国对泰国主权的侵犯,泰国政府内部产生了压力。2018年,泰国军政府努力在两种对立的政策逻辑之间保持平衡。一方面,中国不仅成为一个重要的经济伙伴,而且成为一个潜在的治理模式;另一方面,泰国富有弹性的战略文化和国家认同都强调主权和独立,需要明智的外交与大国作为实现这些目标的主要工具。显然,这里存在一种紧张关系:虽然泰国可能会发现威权资本主义的稳定很有吸引力,但它并不希望来自中国的胁迫,就像它不希望来自美国的胁迫一样。在本章中,我评估了2018年泰国拥抱中国和采用中国的高潮程度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Outlook for Southeast Asia: From Containment to Recovery Brunei Darussalam in 2020: Enduring Stability of a Small Monarchical State in a Turbulent Year Cambodian Foreign Policy in 2020: Chinese Friends and American Foes? Malaysia in 2020: Political Fragmentation, Power Plays and Shifting Coalitions Vietnam’s Economic Prospects in the Wake of the US-China Trade Conflict and COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1