{"title":"Modeling the determinants of English writing performance: Directions to interdisciplinary writing instruction","authors":"Walaipun Puengpipattrakul","doi":"10.56040/wpmd1822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This cross-sectional study examines the impact of five learner-factor groups – intellectual, learning, social, environmental, and mental domains, on writing performance using confirmatory factor analysis and multiple-group structural equation modeling, and qualitative analysis of response scripts. Triangulated data was collected from the persuasive-writing task scores and the Likert-scale and interview-based questionnaire responses of 499 first-year Thai undergraduates from 11 faculties at a university in central Thailand. The results showed the global fits between the hypothesized model and the empirical data (Chi-Square = 330, df = 169, p-value < .001, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.04). The intellectual appeared to be the most powerful factor affecting participant writing performance. The learning factors which impacted the writing performance of the Science and Technology group (β = -.24, t = -2.60) with the highest degree of significance was out-of-class activity (β = .81, t = 42.12, p ≤ .05). Intellectual factors were shown to affect female student writing performance (β = .62, t = 9.42) more so than males (β = .44, t = 6.14, p ≤ .05). Participants viewed instrumental motivation as affecting their writing performance (mean = 2.98, SD = .93, p = .04). Qualitative data from gender non-conforming participants’ responses also uncovered underlying factors: remote student-teacher relationships and unwillingness to communicate, impairing their English learning and writing performance. Insights gleaned from the responses of gender non-conforming participants have led to suggestions for further research regarding writing instruction.","PeriodicalId":38893,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56040/wpmd1822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This cross-sectional study examines the impact of five learner-factor groups – intellectual, learning, social, environmental, and mental domains, on writing performance using confirmatory factor analysis and multiple-group structural equation modeling, and qualitative analysis of response scripts. Triangulated data was collected from the persuasive-writing task scores and the Likert-scale and interview-based questionnaire responses of 499 first-year Thai undergraduates from 11 faculties at a university in central Thailand. The results showed the global fits between the hypothesized model and the empirical data (Chi-Square = 330, df = 169, p-value < .001, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.04). The intellectual appeared to be the most powerful factor affecting participant writing performance. The learning factors which impacted the writing performance of the Science and Technology group (β = -.24, t = -2.60) with the highest degree of significance was out-of-class activity (β = .81, t = 42.12, p ≤ .05). Intellectual factors were shown to affect female student writing performance (β = .62, t = 9.42) more so than males (β = .44, t = 6.14, p ≤ .05). Participants viewed instrumental motivation as affecting their writing performance (mean = 2.98, SD = .93, p = .04). Qualitative data from gender non-conforming participants’ responses also uncovered underlying factors: remote student-teacher relationships and unwillingness to communicate, impairing their English learning and writing performance. Insights gleaned from the responses of gender non-conforming participants have led to suggestions for further research regarding writing instruction.
期刊介绍:
e-FLT is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by the Centre for Language Studies of the National University of Singapore. Its primary objective is to disseminate scholarly information on research and development in the field of Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Learning in Asia and beyond. It publishes articles and book reviews in English as well as in any of the following twelve languages taught at the Centre for Language Studies: Arabic, Chinese, French, German, Hindi, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Tamil, Thai and Vietnamese. It will also welcome any information on upcoming academic conferences, seminars or symposiums as a service to its readers. It is unique in that it is multilingual and practises the policy of accepting and publishing articles in twelve different languages. There will be two issues of e-FLT a year, appearing in the months of June and December. e-FLT is published electronically in the Internet to allow it to reach a wider audience in Asia and the rest of the world, while keeping production costs to a minimum, making it possible to grant free access to the journal. e-FLT focuses primarily on – but is not restricted to – the following areas of inquiry and development in Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Learning: Teaching Methodologies Curriculum Development and Syllabus Design Materials Design Teacher Education and Professional Development Theories of Second Language Acquisition Theories of Second and Foreign Language Teaching Innovations/New Technologies in Language Teaching Linguistics Theories and Language Teaching.