Theft: Grave robbery, territorial conquest, and irrigation

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Planning. E, Nature and Space Pub Date : 2022-12-22 DOI:10.1177/25148486221145410
Carrie Mott
{"title":"Theft: Grave robbery, territorial conquest, and irrigation","authors":"Carrie Mott","doi":"10.1177/25148486221145410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the process of settler colonialism in Washington State's Yakima Valley in the early twentieth century as an example of a regional power bloc that sought to maximize white access to natural resources while dispossessing Native Americans of their lands and access to water. Through a multiscalar approach, I consider how colonization and white supremacy were normalized through infrastructural projects crucial to agricultural development and economic prosperity in the US West A discussion of a 1906 Native American grave robbery operates as an anchor for a larger analysis of how irrigation infrastructure and other reclamation projects served the colonizing aims of the US federal government. In the US West, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and Bureau of Reclamation (BoR) were both federal agencies that played critical roles in an era where public lands were being converted to private property and allotted Native American reservation land was significantly diminished after being sold to non-Natives. The grave robbery itself and ensuing trial serve as indications of everyday life in the Yakima Valley in 1906, revealing the interconnections between infrastructural advancements, white supremacist settler colonialism, and grave robbery.","PeriodicalId":11723,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning. E, Nature and Space","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning. E, Nature and Space","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221145410","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper explores the process of settler colonialism in Washington State's Yakima Valley in the early twentieth century as an example of a regional power bloc that sought to maximize white access to natural resources while dispossessing Native Americans of their lands and access to water. Through a multiscalar approach, I consider how colonization and white supremacy were normalized through infrastructural projects crucial to agricultural development and economic prosperity in the US West A discussion of a 1906 Native American grave robbery operates as an anchor for a larger analysis of how irrigation infrastructure and other reclamation projects served the colonizing aims of the US federal government. In the US West, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and Bureau of Reclamation (BoR) were both federal agencies that played critical roles in an era where public lands were being converted to private property and allotted Native American reservation land was significantly diminished after being sold to non-Natives. The grave robbery itself and ensuing trial serve as indications of everyday life in the Yakima Valley in 1906, revealing the interconnections between infrastructural advancements, white supremacist settler colonialism, and grave robbery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盗窃:盗墓,征服领土和灌溉
本文以20世纪初华盛顿州亚基马河谷的殖民主义为例,探讨了定居者殖民主义的过程,作为一个区域权力集团的例子,该集团试图最大限度地利用白人对自然资源的获取,同时剥夺了印第安人的土地和用水。通过多尺度的方法,我考虑了殖民和白人至上是如何通过对美国西部农业发展和经济繁荣至关重要的基础设施项目正常化的。对1906年美国原住民盗墓的讨论是对灌溉基础设施和其他填海工程如何服务于美国联邦政府殖民目标的更大分析的基础。在美国西部,印第安事务局(BIA)和垦务局(BoR)都是联邦机构,在公共土地转为私有财产的时代发挥了关键作用,分配给印第安人的保留地土地在出售给非印第安人后大大减少。盗墓本身和随后的审判是1906年亚基马山谷日常生活的标志,揭示了基础设施进步、白人至上主义定居者殖民主义和盗墓之间的相互联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.80%
发文量
101
期刊最新文献
Expertise, trading zones and the planning system: A case study of an energy-from-biomass plant Grass versus trees: A proxy debate for deeper anxieties about competing stream worlds Everyday youth climate politics and performances of climate citizenship in Aotearoa New Zealand Political ecologies of a university and land at Cairo's urban periphery: The American University in Cairo's suburban desert campus ‘My body tells me to stay here’: Materiality, identity and everyday politics in Wentang Town, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1