Are online influencers trustworthy? The virtual audience’s response to online influencers’ endorsement in China

Q2 Social Sciences World of Media Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.30547/worldofmedia.3.2018.1
Fei Fan
{"title":"Are online influencers trustworthy? The virtual audience’s response to online influencers’ endorsement in China","authors":"Fei Fan","doi":"10.30547/worldofmedia.3.2018.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although ‘go-social’ becomes an important part of the public’s daily life in China, online users suffer from information overload increasingly when they get exposed to different online contents shared through various social media communication channels today. To compete on digital audience’s attention and increase online communication effectiveness, online influencers are commonly employed by communication practitioners. However, questions like how powerful online influencers are and to what extent digital audience can be motivated by online influencers have not be answered appropriately. Hence, a 2x2 online experiment was used in this pilot study to identify how the use of online influencer endorsement with various social powers affected virtual audience’s response toward the message and their decision-making. A total of 86 participants were voluntarily recruited from mainland China. The study indicated that the use of referent power and expert power could positively predict virtual audience’s perception toward the promotional message. However, if online campaign would like to call for action and influence audience’s behavior, the use of online influencers with expert power could be more effective than that with referent power.","PeriodicalId":36142,"journal":{"name":"World of Media","volume":"245 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World of Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30547/worldofmedia.3.2018.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although ‘go-social’ becomes an important part of the public’s daily life in China, online users suffer from information overload increasingly when they get exposed to different online contents shared through various social media communication channels today. To compete on digital audience’s attention and increase online communication effectiveness, online influencers are commonly employed by communication practitioners. However, questions like how powerful online influencers are and to what extent digital audience can be motivated by online influencers have not be answered appropriately. Hence, a 2x2 online experiment was used in this pilot study to identify how the use of online influencer endorsement with various social powers affected virtual audience’s response toward the message and their decision-making. A total of 86 participants were voluntarily recruited from mainland China. The study indicated that the use of referent power and expert power could positively predict virtual audience’s perception toward the promotional message. However, if online campaign would like to call for action and influence audience’s behavior, the use of online influencers with expert power could be more effective than that with referent power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网红值得信赖吗?虚拟观众对中国网红代言的反应
虽然“去社交”已经成为中国公众日常生活的重要组成部分,但是当人们接触到通过各种社交媒体传播渠道分享的不同网络内容时,网络用户越来越遭受信息过载的困扰。为了争夺数字受众的注意力,提高网络传播的有效性,网络影响者通常被传播从业者所雇佣。然而,诸如网络影响者有多强大以及数字受众在多大程度上可以被网络影响者激励等问题还没有得到适当的回答。因此,本初步研究采用了2x2在线实验,以确定各种社会权力的网络影响者背书如何影响虚拟受众对信息的反应及其决策。共有86名参与者是自愿从中国大陆招募的。研究表明,参考权力和专家权力的使用可以正向预测虚拟受众对促销信息的感知。然而,如果网络活动想要号召行动并影响受众的行为,那么使用具有专家权力的网络影响者可能比使用参考权力的网络影响者更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World of Media
World of Media Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Framing economic crisis: Newspaper coverage during COVID-19 in Bangladesh Perception of environmental information materials by youth audiences: Results of a neuromarketing study Public and private media coverage of the military coup in Zimbabwe Headlines and misinformation in the Nigerian newspapers: Evidence from herder-farmer crisis and ENDSARS protests The Greek ‘success story’ on the international media representations concerning the pandemic of COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1