In pursuit of a new theatre: the case of the Malvern festival

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 N/A THEATER Studies in Theatre and Performance Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI:10.1080/14682761.2021.2006925
Soudabeh Ananisarab
{"title":"In pursuit of a new theatre: the case of the Malvern festival","authors":"Soudabeh Ananisarab","doi":"10.1080/14682761.2021.2006925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article considers the impact of the not-for-profit motive promoted by radical campaigners of the New Theatre movement on accounts of British theatre history. Using the Malvern Festival (1929–1949) as a case study of similar ventures associated with the New Theatre movement, this article explores the ways in which influential figures involved with these projects have distorted narratives of theatre through their emphasis on the not-for-profit/commercial binary opposition. The correspondence between key collaborators in the Festival – Bernard Shaw, Sir Barry Jackson and the lessee of the Malvern Theatre, Roy Limbert – discussed in this article reveals the flaws in such narratives, contradicting previous accounts of the Festival. These letters reveal that Shaw and Jackson failed to adhere to their own condemnations of profitmaking as they struggled to reconcile this outlook with the reality of the Malvern Festival and more broadly the material conditions of theatre.","PeriodicalId":42067,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Theatre and Performance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Theatre and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2021.2006925","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article considers the impact of the not-for-profit motive promoted by radical campaigners of the New Theatre movement on accounts of British theatre history. Using the Malvern Festival (1929–1949) as a case study of similar ventures associated with the New Theatre movement, this article explores the ways in which influential figures involved with these projects have distorted narratives of theatre through their emphasis on the not-for-profit/commercial binary opposition. The correspondence between key collaborators in the Festival – Bernard Shaw, Sir Barry Jackson and the lessee of the Malvern Theatre, Roy Limbert – discussed in this article reveals the flaws in such narratives, contradicting previous accounts of the Festival. These letters reveal that Shaw and Jackson failed to adhere to their own condemnations of profitmaking as they struggled to reconcile this outlook with the reality of the Malvern Festival and more broadly the material conditions of theatre.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
追求一个新的剧院:马尔文艺术节的例子
摘要:本文探讨了激进的新戏剧运动人士所倡导的非营利性动机对英国戏剧史的影响。本文以马尔文戏剧节(1929-1949)为例,研究与新戏剧运动相关的类似冒险,探讨参与这些项目的有影响力的人物如何通过强调非营利/商业二元对立来扭曲戏剧叙事。这篇文章讨论了艺术节主要合作者——萧伯纳、巴里·杰克逊爵士和莫尔文剧院的承租人罗伊·林伯特之间的通信,揭示了这种叙述的缺陷,与之前对艺术节的描述相矛盾。这些信件表明,肖和杰克逊未能坚持自己对盈利的谴责,因为他们努力将这种观点与马尔文艺术节的现实以及更广泛的戏剧物质条件相协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Meaningful agency in participatory performance: a contextual approach Irish rebellion in-yer-face or consigned to history: Seán O’Casey’s The Plough and the Stars in 2016 Physical solidarity as feeling the feeling Daughters Opera: an epistemic representation of feminist solidarities Hyper-femininity as radical resistance: re-envisaging the starlet through a feminist practice of solidarity in It’s Sophie! (2018)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1