Evolving Nature of Financial Intermediation and Economic Growth: Insights from a Bayesian Vector-Autoregression Analysis

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-25 DOI:10.5539/ijef.v15n8p1
Ujjal Chatterjee
{"title":"Evolving Nature of Financial Intermediation and Economic Growth: Insights from a Bayesian Vector-Autoregression Analysis","authors":"Ujjal Chatterjee","doi":"10.5539/ijef.v15n8p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compute the growth of financial intermediary (FI) assets as an indicator of liquidity provided by intermediaries to the economy, as is done in the existing literature, and analyze its impact on the economy. We find that shocks to aggregate FI assets have a significant impact on U.S. real GDP and other macroeconomic indicators. Furthermore, shocks to assets of individual FIs also impact economic growth. However, our sub-sample analysis reveals notable shifts in the nature of financial intermediation: i) an increasing importance of market-based intermediaries, such as securities brokers and dealers, while the relationship between banks and the overall economy has diminished; ii) mutual funds demonstrate a greater impact compared to pension funds, underscoring their relative significance in driving economic outcomes in recent years; iii) insurance companies and shadow banks exhibit consistent significance across the sub-sample periods. These results suggest adopting a holistic approach to policymaking that considers various FIs, enhancing regulation and oversight of systemically important non-bank financial institutions, and monitoring of large insurers to mitigate the risk of financial instability.","PeriodicalId":37166,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies","volume":"51 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v15n8p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compute the growth of financial intermediary (FI) assets as an indicator of liquidity provided by intermediaries to the economy, as is done in the existing literature, and analyze its impact on the economy. We find that shocks to aggregate FI assets have a significant impact on U.S. real GDP and other macroeconomic indicators. Furthermore, shocks to assets of individual FIs also impact economic growth. However, our sub-sample analysis reveals notable shifts in the nature of financial intermediation: i) an increasing importance of market-based intermediaries, such as securities brokers and dealers, while the relationship between banks and the overall economy has diminished; ii) mutual funds demonstrate a greater impact compared to pension funds, underscoring their relative significance in driving economic outcomes in recent years; iii) insurance companies and shadow banks exhibit consistent significance across the sub-sample periods. These results suggest adopting a holistic approach to policymaking that considers various FIs, enhancing regulation and oversight of systemically important non-bank financial institutions, and monitoring of large insurers to mitigate the risk of financial instability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融中介与经济增长的演化性质:来自贝叶斯向量自回归分析的见解
我们计算金融中介机构(FI)资产的增长,作为中介机构向经济提供流动性的指标,正如现有文献所做的那样,并分析其对经济的影响。我们发现金融机构总资产的冲击对美国实际GDP和其他宏观经济指标有显著影响。此外,对单个金融机构资产的冲击也会影响经济增长。然而,我们的子样本分析揭示了金融中介性质的显著变化:1)以市场为基础的中介机构(如证券经纪人和交易商)的重要性日益增加,而银行与整体经济之间的关系已经减弱;Ii)与养老基金相比,共同基金表现出更大的影响,突显出近年来共同基金在推动经济产出方面的相对重要性;保险公司和影子银行在各个子样本时期表现出一致的显著性。这些结果表明,在制定政策时应考虑到各种金融机构,加强对具有系统重要性的非银行金融机构的监管和监督,并对大型保险公司进行监测,以减轻金融不稳定的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies
International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Payment Market and Pricing: A Bibliometric Review Why is Technological Innovation Locally Concentrated? A Theoretical Review Present Bias and Quality Reduction on Daily Deal Platforms Capital Structure and Macroeconomic Determinants in Emerging Country: A Panel Quantile Regression Approach Fiscal Pedal: Fraud or Creative Accounting? A Theoretical Understanding of the Dangerous Fiscal Cycles that Affected the Brazilian Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1