Empirical Analysis of Posts and Interactions: A case of Australian Government Facebook Pages

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems Pub Date : 2016-12-31 DOI:10.17705/1PAIS.08405
L. Alam
{"title":"Empirical Analysis of Posts and Interactions: A case of Australian Government Facebook Pages","authors":"L. Alam","doi":"10.17705/1PAIS.08405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on government use of Facebook (FB) and citizen engagement has increased in the last five years or so; however there is a scarcity of empirical research that identify the extent of agency and audience engagement on government FB pages. Questions still remains unanswered if agencies with dissimilar functional focus engage differently in FB. Based on a large-scale world-first empirical analysis of over 147 federal government FB pages, this article presents insights on online participation in terms of government posts and citizen interactions observed over three years (2013-2016) across different types of agencies (i.e. operational, policy, regulatory and specialist). Preliminary findings show convincing agency and audience engagement on FB pages as a platform for sharing and communicating. However there are differences among the agencies in terms of audience and agency engagement relative to post activity and interactions. The findings have implications for federal government agencies, both from benchmarking and capability building perspectives.","PeriodicalId":43480,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17705/1PAIS.08405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Research on government use of Facebook (FB) and citizen engagement has increased in the last five years or so; however there is a scarcity of empirical research that identify the extent of agency and audience engagement on government FB pages. Questions still remains unanswered if agencies with dissimilar functional focus engage differently in FB. Based on a large-scale world-first empirical analysis of over 147 federal government FB pages, this article presents insights on online participation in terms of government posts and citizen interactions observed over three years (2013-2016) across different types of agencies (i.e. operational, policy, regulatory and specialist). Preliminary findings show convincing agency and audience engagement on FB pages as a platform for sharing and communicating. However there are differences among the agencies in terms of audience and agency engagement relative to post activity and interactions. The findings have implications for federal government agencies, both from benchmarking and capability building perspectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帖子与互动的实证分析:以澳大利亚政府Facebook页面为例
过去五年左右,有关政府使用Facebook和公民参与的研究有所增加;然而,缺乏实证研究来确定机构和受众在政府FB页面上的参与程度。职能重点不同的机构是否以不同的方式参与FB的问题仍未得到解答。基于对超过147个联邦政府FB页面的大规模世界首例实证分析,本文展示了对三年(2013-2016年)不同类型机构(即运营、政策、监管和专家)在政府职位和公民互动方面的在线参与的见解。初步调查结果显示,facebook页面作为分享和交流的平台,吸引了代理商和受众的参与。然而,各机构之间在受众和机构参与方面存在差异,相对于后活动和互动。这些发现对联邦政府机构具有启示意义,无论是从基准制定还是能力建设的角度来看。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Campaign Presentation Cues on Crowdfunding Performance – Reviewing the Empirical Reward-Based Crowdfunding Literature Getting Around to It: How Design Science Researchers Set Future Work Agendas Beyond Digital Data and Information Technology: Conceptualizing Data-Driven Culture Digital Nudge Stacking and Backfiring: Understanding Sustainable E-Commerce Purchase Decisions Improvisational and Dynamic Capabilities as Drivers of Business Model Innovation: An Enterprise Architecture Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1