Evaluate Database Management System Quality By Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methodolog

Mendel Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.13164/mendel.2022.2.067
Asmaa Jameel Al Nawaiseh, Audi Albtoush, R AL-msie'Deen, Sabah Jamil Al Nawaiseh
{"title":"Evaluate Database Management System Quality By Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methodolog","authors":"Asmaa Jameel Al Nawaiseh, Audi Albtoush, R AL-msie'Deen, Sabah Jamil Al Nawaiseh","doi":"10.13164/mendel.2022.2.067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Any organization that intends to use component-based software development, like outsourcing software, must first evaluate existing components against system requirements to find the best fit among many alternatives. As a result, there should be a mechanism to help with decision-making. Our proposed methodology tries to select the best alternative among available components, using the best decision-making approach. As an integrated method for order preference, the methodology in this paper uses two well-known criterion decision-making procedures, namely Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). By analyzing and selecting the optimal solution among a variety of Out Sourcing (OS) modules, the new model design makes the decision-making process easier. We evaluated two software attributes and predicted which was more effective. In this case, the advantage of utilizing AHP is that it allows the developer to evaluate the structure of the OS selection problem and calculate weights for the chosen criteria. After that, the SAW technique is used to calculate the alternatives ratings for OS components. The integration strategy used in our model and the resulting preference indication, which is produced as an explicit numeric value.","PeriodicalId":38293,"journal":{"name":"Mendel","volume":"220 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mendel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13164/mendel.2022.2.067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Any organization that intends to use component-based software development, like outsourcing software, must first evaluate existing components against system requirements to find the best fit among many alternatives. As a result, there should be a mechanism to help with decision-making. Our proposed methodology tries to select the best alternative among available components, using the best decision-making approach. As an integrated method for order preference, the methodology in this paper uses two well-known criterion decision-making procedures, namely Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). By analyzing and selecting the optimal solution among a variety of Out Sourcing (OS) modules, the new model design makes the decision-making process easier. We evaluated two software attributes and predicted which was more effective. In this case, the advantage of utilizing AHP is that it allows the developer to evaluate the structure of the OS selection problem and calculate weights for the chosen criteria. After that, the SAW technique is used to calculate the alternatives ratings for OS components. The integration strategy used in our model and the resulting preference indication, which is produced as an explicit numeric value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用层次分析法和简单加性加权法评价数据库管理系统质量
任何打算使用基于组件的软件开发(如外包软件)的组织,都必须首先根据系统需求评估现有组件,以便在众多备选方案中找到最适合的。因此,应该有一个机制来帮助决策。我们提出的方法试图在可用组件中选择最佳替代方案,使用最佳决策方法。作为排序偏好的综合方法,本文的方法采用了两种著名的准则决策程序,即层次分析法(AHP)和简单加性加权法(SAW)。通过分析和选择各种外包模块的最优解决方案,使决策过程更加简单。我们评估了两个软件属性,并预测了哪个更有效。在这种情况下,使用AHP的优势在于它允许开发人员评估操作系统选择问题的结构并计算所选标准的权重。然后,使用SAW技术计算OS组件的备选等级。在我们的模型中使用的集成策略和结果偏好指示,它以显式数值的形式产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mendel
Mendel Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Detecting Outliers Using Modified Recursive PCA Algorithm For Dynamic Streaming Data Stock and Structured Warrant Portfolio Optimization Using Black-Litterman Model and Binomial Method Optimized Fixed-Time Synergetic Controller via a modified Salp Swarm Algorithm for Acute and Chronic HBV Transmission System Initial Coin Offering Prediction Comparison Using Ridge Regression, Artificial Neural Network, Random Forest Regression, and Hybrid ANN-Ridge Predicting Football Match Outcomes with Machine Learning Approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1