Information Security Tradeoffs: The User Perspective

Gerald V. Post, A. Kagan
{"title":"Information Security Tradeoffs: The User Perspective","authors":"Gerald V. Post, A. Kagan","doi":"10.1201/1086.1065898X/46353.15.4.20060901/95428.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract When taking a typical approach to computer security, one could make the following relatively extreme statements: A piece of data can be rendered completely secure with 100 percent assurance. Simply write the data on a piece of paper, burn the paper, and scatter the ashes. No one will be able to read or alter that data ever again. Of course, this exercise and the underlying premise are a trick. Understanding the deception is the key to understanding information security: Data that is being “protected” has to remain available to legitimate users. There is a strong tendency for information security researchers and practitioners to focus on “securing” data by preventing attacks and loss of data. An IS practitioner's job might depend on preventing and recovering from security-related problems. However, increased monitoring and enhanced use of security controls can easily lead to interference and delays of information usage for legitimate users.","PeriodicalId":36738,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Systems Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Systems Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/1086.1065898X/46353.15.4.20060901/95428.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract When taking a typical approach to computer security, one could make the following relatively extreme statements: A piece of data can be rendered completely secure with 100 percent assurance. Simply write the data on a piece of paper, burn the paper, and scatter the ashes. No one will be able to read or alter that data ever again. Of course, this exercise and the underlying premise are a trick. Understanding the deception is the key to understanding information security: Data that is being “protected” has to remain available to legitimate users. There is a strong tendency for information security researchers and practitioners to focus on “securing” data by preventing attacks and loss of data. An IS practitioner's job might depend on preventing and recovering from security-related problems. However, increased monitoring and enhanced use of security controls can easily lead to interference and delays of information usage for legitimate users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息安全权衡:用户视角
当采取一种典型的计算机安全方法时,人们可以做出以下相对极端的陈述:一条数据可以100%保证完全安全。简单地把数据写在一张纸上,烧掉纸,撒上灰烬。再也没有人能读取或修改这些数据了。当然,这个练习和潜在的前提是一个技巧。理解欺骗是理解信息安全的关键:被“保护”的数据必须对合法用户保持可用性。对于信息安全研究人员和从业者来说,有一种强烈的趋势是通过防止攻击和数据丢失来关注“保护”数据。信息系统从业者的工作可能取决于预防和从安全相关问题中恢复。但是,增加监视和增强安全控制的使用很容易导致合法用户使用信息的干扰和延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Systems Security
Journal of Information Systems Security Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information Systems Security: 17th International Conference, ICISS 2021, Patna, India, December 16–20, 2021, Proceedings Information Systems Security: 16th International Conference, ICISS 2020, Jammu, India, December 16–20, 2020, Proceedings Information Systems Security: 15th International Conference, ICISS 2019, Hyderabad, India, December 16–20, 2019, Proceedings From the Editor's Desk Security Sickness in the Health Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1