大学病院における処方(外来)オーダエントリシステムの現状およびシステム利用医師側からの評価

有子 酒井, 孝男 折井, 志謹 劉, 隆夫 青山, 幸一 中村, 一 小瀧, 櫻井 恒太郎, 成允 開原, 立二 伊賀
{"title":"大学病院における処方(外来)オーダエントリシステムの現状およびシステム利用医師側からの評価","authors":"有子 酒井, 孝男 折井, 志謹 劉, 隆夫 青山, 幸一 中村, 一 小瀧, 櫻井 恒太郎, 成允 開原, 立二 伊賀","doi":"10.5649/JJPHCS1975.24.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prescription order entry systems began to be introduced into university hospitals a decade ago. Compared to the handwritten prescription system, the computerized system offers a lot of advantages and possibilities. Some issues are arguable. We conducted research similar to this report two years ago. Since then, however, several institutions have introduced a prescription order entry system and/or added new functions to their systems.Therefore, we again carried out our survey concerning prescription order entry system used in university hospitals and analyzed the present status of the systems and its evaluation by physicians. We compared the results with those obtained from our previous survey. In most institutions where a prescription order entry system is being used, more than 80% of doctors answered that the “Do prescription function” and the “I nput check on entry” were useful. Evaluation of the other functions by doctors showed a tendency to be low, though institutions which provided these functions were too few to drow make a significant conclusion. It was proved that introduction of a prescription order entry system contributed to making prescription order entry more efficient because it was able to save labor necessary to writing prescriptions and to having to write it again on a chart, avoid the duplication of prescriptions among different departments, and diminish clarification calls from the pharmacy.We found that doctors using prescription order entry systems give them high ratings but were dissatisfied with their processing speed. It was suggested that comparison and examination be made of models of machines and versions of systems used by the respective institutions.","PeriodicalId":17399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Nippon Hospital Pharmacists Association","volume":"65 1","pages":"409-415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Nippon Hospital Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5649/JJPHCS1975.24.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Prescription order entry systems began to be introduced into university hospitals a decade ago. Compared to the handwritten prescription system, the computerized system offers a lot of advantages and possibilities. Some issues are arguable. We conducted research similar to this report two years ago. Since then, however, several institutions have introduced a prescription order entry system and/or added new functions to their systems.Therefore, we again carried out our survey concerning prescription order entry system used in university hospitals and analyzed the present status of the systems and its evaluation by physicians. We compared the results with those obtained from our previous survey. In most institutions where a prescription order entry system is being used, more than 80% of doctors answered that the “Do prescription function” and the “I nput check on entry” were useful. Evaluation of the other functions by doctors showed a tendency to be low, though institutions which provided these functions were too few to drow make a significant conclusion. It was proved that introduction of a prescription order entry system contributed to making prescription order entry more efficient because it was able to save labor necessary to writing prescriptions and to having to write it again on a chart, avoid the duplication of prescriptions among different departments, and diminish clarification calls from the pharmacy.We found that doctors using prescription order entry systems give them high ratings but were dissatisfied with their processing speed. It was suggested that comparison and examination be made of models of machines and versions of systems used by the respective institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学医院的处方(门诊)自动入口系统的现状及系统使用医生的评价
十年前,处方单输入系统开始被引入大学医院。与手写处方系统相比,计算机化系统提供了许多优点和可能性。有些问题是有争议的。我们在两年前进行了类似的研究。然而,从那时起,一些机构引入了处方订单输入系统和/或在其系统中添加了新功能。因此,我们再次对高校医院的处方单录入系统进行了调查,分析了系统的现状和医生对系统的评价。我们将结果与上次调查的结果进行了比较。在大多数使用处方单录入系统的机构中,超过80%的医生回答“做处方功能”和“输入检查”是有用的。医生对其他功能的评价往往较低,尽管提供这些功能的机构太少,无法得出有意义的结论。事实证明,引入处方单录入系统有助于提高处方单录入的效率,因为它可以节省写处方和在图表上重新写处方所必需的劳动力,避免不同部门之间的处方重复,并减少药房的澄清电话。我们发现,使用处方单输入系统的医生给了他们很高的评分,但对他们的处理速度不满意。有人建议对各机构使用的机器模型和系统版本进行比较和审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Urate-Lowering Drugs Using a Prescription Database 球形吸着炭 (クレメジン原体) の胆汁酸吸着性 癌化学療法時の口内炎に対するプロスタンディン®軟膏・アルロイドG液混合製剤の有効性 Collaboration of Hospital Pharmacists with Pharmaceutical College on Evaluation of Generic Drugs : The Case of Dissolution Test of Sodium Loxoprofen Tablets A Case Report and Evaluation of Pirmenol Toxicity Appeared with Liver Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1