Suspicious bodies: anti-citizens and biomedical anarchists in South Africa’s public health care system

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropology Southern Africa Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/23323256.2022.2044360
Kudakwashe Vanyoro
{"title":"Suspicious bodies: anti-citizens and biomedical anarchists in South Africa’s public health care system","authors":"Kudakwashe Vanyoro","doi":"10.1080/23323256.2022.2044360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has become “common sense” to assert that access to public health care services for foreign migrants is de facto exclusionary. Conceptual tools for assessing these experiences are relatively absent and limited to “medical xenophobia.” This article deploys suspicion as a heuristic to explore the practices that health care providers in South Africa’s public health care system adopt in reading black bodies against the grain to expose their repressed or hidden meanings. It argues that the discursive construction of “outsiders” by some health care providers is based not simply on nationality, citizenship or legal status but on a vigilant preparedness for attack rooted in professional mandates to watch for possible “predators.” Such health care providers do not simply orchestrate a direct attack on migrant bodies; they also respond to the biomedical signification of individual black bodies based on a process of “creaming” that takes place at the front line of provider–patient interactions that are embedded within a wider bureaucracy of migration and health governance. In the context of a high HIV/AIDS burden, which necessitates the prioritisation of adherence and retention over anything else, anthropologists are also likely to see foreign migrants accessing services based on biomedical discourses and considerations.","PeriodicalId":54118,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology Southern Africa","volume":"377 1","pages":"30 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2022.2044360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has become “common sense” to assert that access to public health care services for foreign migrants is de facto exclusionary. Conceptual tools for assessing these experiences are relatively absent and limited to “medical xenophobia.” This article deploys suspicion as a heuristic to explore the practices that health care providers in South Africa’s public health care system adopt in reading black bodies against the grain to expose their repressed or hidden meanings. It argues that the discursive construction of “outsiders” by some health care providers is based not simply on nationality, citizenship or legal status but on a vigilant preparedness for attack rooted in professional mandates to watch for possible “predators.” Such health care providers do not simply orchestrate a direct attack on migrant bodies; they also respond to the biomedical signification of individual black bodies based on a process of “creaming” that takes place at the front line of provider–patient interactions that are embedded within a wider bureaucracy of migration and health governance. In the context of a high HIV/AIDS burden, which necessitates the prioritisation of adherence and retention over anything else, anthropologists are also likely to see foreign migrants accessing services based on biomedical discourses and considerations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可疑机构:南非公共卫生保健系统中的反公民和生物医学无政府主义者
断言外国移徙者获得公共保健服务实际上是被排斥的,这已成为"常识"。评估这些经验的概念性工具相对缺乏,仅限于“医疗仇外心理”。这篇文章部署怀疑作为一种启发式探索的做法,卫生保健提供者在南非的公共卫生保健系统采用阅读黑人身体反对粮食暴露其压抑或隐藏的意义。它认为,一些卫生保健提供者对“局外人”的话语建构不仅仅基于国籍、公民身份或法律地位,而是基于对攻击的警惕准备,这种准备植根于观察可能的“捕食者”的专业授权。这些医疗服务提供者不只是精心策划对移民尸体的直接攻击;他们还对个体黑人身体的生物医学意义做出回应,这一反应基于一种“奶油化”过程,这种过程发生在提供者与患者互动的第一线,这种互动嵌入在更广泛的移民和卫生治理官僚机构中。在艾滋病毒/艾滋病负担沉重的背景下,必须优先考虑坚持和保留,人类学家也可能看到外国移民根据生物医学的论述和考虑获得服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Multispecies encounters in conservation landscapes in Southern Africa. Killing tsetse and/or saving wildlife? A multispecies assemblage in colonial Zambia (1895-1959). Performing multispecies studies in Southern Africa: historical legacies, marginalised subjects, reflexive positionalities. Wildlife corridors in a Southern African conservation landscape: the political ecology of multispecies mobilities along the arteries of anthropogenic conservation. Anthropology Southern Africa statement on Israeli state violence in Gaza
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1