Understanding barriers to adoption of sustainable nitrogen management practices in California

IF 2.2 4区 农林科学 Q2 ECOLOGY Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.2489/jswc.2023.00109
J. Rudnick, S. Khalsa, M. Lubell, M. Leinfelder-Miles, K. Gould, P. H. Brown
{"title":"Understanding barriers to adoption of sustainable nitrogen management practices in California","authors":"J. Rudnick, S. Khalsa, M. Lubell, M. Leinfelder-Miles, K. Gould, P. H. Brown","doi":"10.2489/jswc.2023.00109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Achieving sustainability in agricultural nitrogen (N) management relies on farmers’ decisions to reduce fertilizer inputs and adopt conservation management practices. Understanding the drivers and barriers to farmers’ adoption of improved N management practices is critical to developing effective management and policy approaches on this intractable challenge. Existing research on farmer behavior has assumed that any barrier to adoption will result in lower practice adoption rates, without fully understanding how barriers may vary across different management practices, farm and farmer types, and stages of adoption. By leveraging two farmer survey data sets (total n > 1,900), this study diagnoses key barriers to adoption across 11 different N management practices and a large diversity of farmer and farm types across the California Central Valley. We find resource constraints, technical knowledge, and uncertainty emerge as key barrier types that differentially affect farmers at various stages of adoption. On a practice-by-practice basis, uncertainty barriers appear greatest for nonadopters of a practice, whereas practice adopters are more likely to report resource barriers. Across management practices at the farm level, farmers with higher self-reported conservation orientations are more likely to report being affected by all barrier types, as compared to their peers with lower self-reported conservation orientations. Our findings demonstrate that barriers to adoption are more complex than simply the factors that predict lower adoption, as both adopters and nonadopters experience barriers. Furthermore, factors that typically predict higher adoption, such as conservation motivation, do not insulate a farmer from facing barriers to adoption. We consider how adopters are likely to go through a learning process while moving from considering to fully implementing a new practice, during which different barriers to behavior change may be encountered. We argue that interventions intended to motivate farmer adoption of improved management practices need to take more nuanced approaches to understanding how barriers to adoption are likely to vary across stages of adoption, farm and farmer type, and specific management practices.","PeriodicalId":50049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2023.00109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Achieving sustainability in agricultural nitrogen (N) management relies on farmers’ decisions to reduce fertilizer inputs and adopt conservation management practices. Understanding the drivers and barriers to farmers’ adoption of improved N management practices is critical to developing effective management and policy approaches on this intractable challenge. Existing research on farmer behavior has assumed that any barrier to adoption will result in lower practice adoption rates, without fully understanding how barriers may vary across different management practices, farm and farmer types, and stages of adoption. By leveraging two farmer survey data sets (total n > 1,900), this study diagnoses key barriers to adoption across 11 different N management practices and a large diversity of farmer and farm types across the California Central Valley. We find resource constraints, technical knowledge, and uncertainty emerge as key barrier types that differentially affect farmers at various stages of adoption. On a practice-by-practice basis, uncertainty barriers appear greatest for nonadopters of a practice, whereas practice adopters are more likely to report resource barriers. Across management practices at the farm level, farmers with higher self-reported conservation orientations are more likely to report being affected by all barrier types, as compared to their peers with lower self-reported conservation orientations. Our findings demonstrate that barriers to adoption are more complex than simply the factors that predict lower adoption, as both adopters and nonadopters experience barriers. Furthermore, factors that typically predict higher adoption, such as conservation motivation, do not insulate a farmer from facing barriers to adoption. We consider how adopters are likely to go through a learning process while moving from considering to fully implementing a new practice, during which different barriers to behavior change may be encountered. We argue that interventions intended to motivate farmer adoption of improved management practices need to take more nuanced approaches to understanding how barriers to adoption are likely to vary across stages of adoption, farm and farmer type, and specific management practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解加州采用可持续氮管理实践的障碍
实现农业氮(N)管理的可持续性依赖于农民减少肥料投入和采取保护管理措施的决定。了解农民采用改良氮素管理做法的驱动因素和障碍,对于制定应对这一棘手挑战的有效管理和政策方法至关重要。现有的关于农民行为的研究假设,任何阻碍采用的障碍都会导致较低的实践采用率,而没有充分理解障碍在不同的管理实践、农场和农民类型以及采用阶段之间的差异。通过利用两个农民调查数据集(总n > 1,900),本研究诊断了加州中央山谷11种不同的氮管理实践和大量农民和农场类型采用的主要障碍。我们发现,资源限制、技术知识和不确定性成为主要障碍类型,在不同的采用阶段对农民产生不同的影响。在一个实践接一个实践的基础上,不确定性障碍对于一个实践的非采用者来说是最大的,而实践采用者更有可能报告资源障碍。在农场层面的管理实践中,与自我报告保护倾向较低的同龄人相比,自我报告保护倾向较高的农民更有可能报告受到所有障碍类型的影响。我们的研究结果表明,采用的障碍比预测低采用率的简单因素要复杂得多,因为采用者和非采用者都经历了障碍。此外,通常预测更高采用率的因素,如保护动机,并不能使农民免于面临采用率障碍。我们将考虑采用者在从考虑到完全实现新实践的过程中可能如何经历一个学习过程,在此过程中可能会遇到不同的行为改变障碍。我们认为,旨在激励农民采用改进的管理实践的干预措施需要采取更细致入微的方法,以了解在采用阶段、农场和农民类型以及具体的管理实践中,采用的障碍可能如何变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (JSWC) is a multidisciplinary journal of natural resource conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. The journal has two sections: the A Section containing various departments and features, and the Research Section containing peer-reviewed research papers.
期刊最新文献
Defining boundaries and conceptual frameworks for ecologically focused agricultural systems Artificial intelligence for assessing organic matter content and related soil properties Decompaction and organic amendments provide short-term improvements in soil health during urban, residential development Effect of biochar treatment on soil pH and cucumber fruit: A demonstration of the importance of biochar amendment on the tropical soils of Nigeria Erratum for Martinez et al., Leveraging ecological monitoring programs to collect soil and geomorphology data across the western United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1