Comparative study of various subpopulations of cytotoxic cells in blood and ascites from patients with ovarian carcinoma

Š. Lukešová, V. Vroblová, J. Tošner, J. Kopecký, I. Sedláková, E. Cermakova, D. Vokurková, O. Kopecký
{"title":"Comparative study of various subpopulations of cytotoxic cells in blood and ascites from patients with ovarian carcinoma","authors":"Š. Lukešová, V. Vroblová, J. Tošner, J. Kopecký, I. Sedláková, E. Cermakova, D. Vokurková, O. Kopecký","doi":"10.5114/wo.2015.54388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of the study A number of observations have indicated that the immune system plays a significant role in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In cases of EOC, the prognostic significance of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes has not been clearly explained yet. The aim is to determine the phenotype and activation molecules of cytotoxic T cell and NK cell subpopulations and to compare their representation in malignant ascites and peripheral blood in patients with ovarian cancer. Material and methods Cytotoxic cells taken from blood samples of the cubital vein and malignant ascites were obtained from 53 patients with EOC. Their surface and activation characteristics were determined by means of a flow cytometer. Immunophenotype multiparametric analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was carried out. Results CD3+ T lymphocytes were the main population of TILs (75.9%) and PBLs (70.9%). The number of activating T cells was significantly higher in TILs: CD3+/69+ 6.7% vs. 0.8% (p < 0.001). The representation of (CD3–/16+56+) NK cells in TILs was significantly higher: 11.0% vs. 5.6% (p = 0.041); likewise CD56bright and CD–56bright from CD56+ cells were higher in TILs (both p < 0.001). The activation receptor NKG2D was present in 45.1% of TILs vs. 32.3% of PBLs (p = 0.034), but we did not find a significant difference in the numbers of CD56+/NKG2D+ in TILs and PBLs. Conclusions These results prove that the characteristics and intensity of anti-tumour responses are different in compared compartments (ascites/PBLs). The knowledge of phenotype and functions of effector cells is the basic precondition for understanding the anti-tumour immune response.","PeriodicalId":10652,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":"290 - 299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2015.54388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Aim of the study A number of observations have indicated that the immune system plays a significant role in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In cases of EOC, the prognostic significance of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes has not been clearly explained yet. The aim is to determine the phenotype and activation molecules of cytotoxic T cell and NK cell subpopulations and to compare their representation in malignant ascites and peripheral blood in patients with ovarian cancer. Material and methods Cytotoxic cells taken from blood samples of the cubital vein and malignant ascites were obtained from 53 patients with EOC. Their surface and activation characteristics were determined by means of a flow cytometer. Immunophenotype multiparametric analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was carried out. Results CD3+ T lymphocytes were the main population of TILs (75.9%) and PBLs (70.9%). The number of activating T cells was significantly higher in TILs: CD3+/69+ 6.7% vs. 0.8% (p < 0.001). The representation of (CD3–/16+56+) NK cells in TILs was significantly higher: 11.0% vs. 5.6% (p = 0.041); likewise CD56bright and CD–56bright from CD56+ cells were higher in TILs (both p < 0.001). The activation receptor NKG2D was present in 45.1% of TILs vs. 32.3% of PBLs (p = 0.034), but we did not find a significant difference in the numbers of CD56+/NKG2D+ in TILs and PBLs. Conclusions These results prove that the characteristics and intensity of anti-tumour responses are different in compared compartments (ascites/PBLs). The knowledge of phenotype and functions of effector cells is the basic precondition for understanding the anti-tumour immune response.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卵巢癌患者血液和腹水中不同细胞毒性细胞亚群的比较研究
研究目的许多观察结果表明,免疫系统在上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者中起着重要作用。在EOC病例中,肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞的预后意义尚未明确解释。目的是确定细胞毒性T细胞和NK细胞亚群的表型和激活分子,并比较它们在卵巢癌患者恶性腹水和外周血中的表现。材料与方法对53例EOC患者的肘静脉及恶性腹水血样进行细胞毒细胞检测。用流式细胞仪测定其表面和活化特性。外周血淋巴细胞(pbl)和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs)的免疫表型多参数分析。结果TILs(75.9%)和pbl(70.9%)以CD3+ T淋巴细胞为主。激活T细胞的数量在TILs中显著增加:CD3+/69+ 6.7% vs. 0.8% (p < 0.001)。(CD3 - /16+56+) NK细胞在TILs中的代表性显著高于前者:11.0% vs. 5.6% (p = 0.041);同样,CD56+细胞的CD56bright和CD-56bright在TILs中也较高(p < 0.001)。激活受体NKG2D存在于45.1%的TILs和32.3%的pbl中(p = 0.034),但我们没有发现TILs和pbl中CD56+/NKG2D+的数量有显著差异。结论腹水/ pbl间室抗肿瘤反应的特点和强度不同。了解效应细胞的表型和功能是了解抗肿瘤免疫应答的基本前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of nitroxoline in urologic oncology – a review of evidence Health and coping styles including resources of close family members supporting leukaemia patients Clinicopathological significance of protein disulphide isomerase A3 and phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in cervical carcinoma High tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes correlate with distinct gene expression profile and favourable survival in single hormone receptor-positive breast cancer The impact of altering the concentration of coffee constituents on their anticancer effect on oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line – in vitro study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1