The role of organised interests in shaping Croatia's negotiating positions in the Council of the EU

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES East European Politics Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI:10.1080/21599165.2022.2120474
Igor Vidačak
{"title":"The role of organised interests in shaping Croatia's negotiating positions in the Council of the EU","authors":"Igor Vidačak","doi":"10.1080/21599165.2022.2120474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n The relationship between interest groups and national governments in shaping the decision-making in the Council of the EU is still largely unobserved. By focusing on the case study of Croatia, this article contests the general assumptions of liberal intergovernmentalism about the process and character of national preference formation and demonstrates that economic and societal interests do not have primacy in influencing a national government’s positions in the Council. It is argued that the legacy of a country’s EU accession process, coupled with weak oversight and accountability mechanisms, are among the most important factors in explaining the government's non-inclusive management of EU affairs.","PeriodicalId":46570,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2120474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The relationship between interest groups and national governments in shaping the decision-making in the Council of the EU is still largely unobserved. By focusing on the case study of Croatia, this article contests the general assumptions of liberal intergovernmentalism about the process and character of national preference formation and demonstrates that economic and societal interests do not have primacy in influencing a national government’s positions in the Council. It is argued that the legacy of a country’s EU accession process, coupled with weak oversight and accountability mechanisms, are among the most important factors in explaining the government's non-inclusive management of EU affairs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有组织的利益在塑造克罗地亚在欧盟理事会的谈判立场方面的作用
利益集团与各国政府在欧盟理事会决策过程中的关系在很大程度上仍未被观察到。通过对克罗地亚的个案研究,本文对自由政府间主义关于国家偏好形成过程和特征的一般假设提出了质疑,并表明经济和社会利益在影响一国政府在理事会中的立场方面并不具有首要地位。有人认为,一个国家加入欧盟过程的遗留问题,加上薄弱的监督和问责机制,是解释政府对欧盟事务的非包容性管理的最重要因素之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East European Politics
East European Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.40%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
A digital party organisation? Evolution of the Czech Pirates Who supports the New Left? Evidence from Croatia Looking beyond the East-West divide? Re-appraising the willingness to pay for environmental quality in 19 European countries Leader vs. the party dilemma: the case of a party rebirth in Czechia Theorising the effects of EU emigration for origin countries: win-win, dependency or agency?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1