Quality Assessment of Oven Dried and Traditional Sun Dried Channa Punctatus

S. N. Jahan, Salma Akhtar
{"title":"Quality Assessment of Oven Dried and Traditional Sun Dried Channa Punctatus","authors":"S. N. Jahan, Salma Akhtar","doi":"10.11648/J.IJFSB.20190404.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to compare the quality assessment in terms of freshness, chemical composition and bacterial load of sun dried fishes and oven dried Channapunctatus during July 2017 to December 2017. Traditionally dried and fresh raw C. punctatus were collected from the Singrabajar of Chalanbeel area, Bangladesh and brought into the laboratory of Department of Fisheries of University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Fresh species were processed and dried in the electric oven at 105°C. After the organoleptic analysis it was observed that the appearance, odor, color, texture and overall acceptability of traditionally sun dried fishes were 6.75±0.43, 7.00±0.00, 7.12±0.78, 6.62±0.51, 6.75±0.46 and oven dried fishes were 7.75±1.29, 6.87±0.92, 7.25±1.63, 7.5±1.30 and 7.50±1.30, respectively. Significant difference was found between the sun dried and oven dried C. punctatus for the mean values of all organoleptic characteristics. In case of proximate composition the lipid, protein, ash and moisture contents were 3.10±0.60%, 57.50±2.30%, 21.00±1.20% and 14.83±1.45% in sun dried fishes and 5.85±1.25%, 70.15±1.30%, 13.00±1.50% and 8.50±1.40% was observed in oven dried fish. Significant difference was found in proximate composition. The pH contents varied from 6.3±0.31 (oven dried) to 6.75±0.70 (sun dried). The lowest TVB-N content (3.85mg/100g) was found in oven dried fishes and the highest (4.02mg/100g) was found in sun dried fishes and the microbial load varied from 4.9×102 (oven dried) to 3.9×103 (sun dried). Significant difference was found between the sun and oven dried C. punctatus for the aerobic plate count and TVB-N, but those are belongs in acceptable range.","PeriodicalId":14158,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJFSB.20190404.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the quality assessment in terms of freshness, chemical composition and bacterial load of sun dried fishes and oven dried Channapunctatus during July 2017 to December 2017. Traditionally dried and fresh raw C. punctatus were collected from the Singrabajar of Chalanbeel area, Bangladesh and brought into the laboratory of Department of Fisheries of University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Fresh species were processed and dried in the electric oven at 105°C. After the organoleptic analysis it was observed that the appearance, odor, color, texture and overall acceptability of traditionally sun dried fishes were 6.75±0.43, 7.00±0.00, 7.12±0.78, 6.62±0.51, 6.75±0.46 and oven dried fishes were 7.75±1.29, 6.87±0.92, 7.25±1.63, 7.5±1.30 and 7.50±1.30, respectively. Significant difference was found between the sun dried and oven dried C. punctatus for the mean values of all organoleptic characteristics. In case of proximate composition the lipid, protein, ash and moisture contents were 3.10±0.60%, 57.50±2.30%, 21.00±1.20% and 14.83±1.45% in sun dried fishes and 5.85±1.25%, 70.15±1.30%, 13.00±1.50% and 8.50±1.40% was observed in oven dried fish. Significant difference was found in proximate composition. The pH contents varied from 6.3±0.31 (oven dried) to 6.75±0.70 (sun dried). The lowest TVB-N content (3.85mg/100g) was found in oven dried fishes and the highest (4.02mg/100g) was found in sun dried fishes and the microbial load varied from 4.9×102 (oven dried) to 3.9×103 (sun dried). Significant difference was found between the sun and oven dried C. punctatus for the aerobic plate count and TVB-N, but those are belongs in acceptable range.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
炉干和传统晒干马尾莲的质量评价
本研究的目的是比较2017年7月至2017年12月期间晒干鱼和烘箱干鱼在新鲜度、化学成分和细菌负荷方面的质量评估。从孟加拉国Chalanbeel地区的Singrabajar收集了传统干燥和新鲜的生刺棘鱼,并将其带入孟加拉国拉杰沙希大学渔业系实验室。新鲜的品种在105°C的电烤箱中加工和干燥。经感官分析,传统晒干鱼的外观、气味、颜色、质地和总体可接受度分别为6.75±0.43、7.00±0.00、7.12±0.78、6.62±0.51、6.75±0.46,烘箱干鱼的外观、气味、颜色、质地和总体可接受度分别为7.75±1.29、6.87±0.92、7.25±1.63、7.5±1.30和7.50±1.30。晒干和烘干马尾松各感官特征的平均值有显著差异。太阳干鱼的脂肪、蛋白质、灰分和水分含量分别为3.10±0.60%、57.50±2.30%、21.00±1.20%和14.83±1.45%,烘箱干鱼的脂肪、蛋白质、灰分和水分含量分别为5.85±1.25%、70.15±1.30%、13.00±1.50%和8.50±1.40%。在近似成分上发现显著差异。pH值从6.3±0.31(烘箱干燥)到6.75±0.70(晒干)不等。蒸干鱼的TVB-N含量最低(3.85mg/100g),晒干鱼的TVB-N含量最高(4.02mg/100g),微生物负荷从4.9×102(烘干)到3.9×103(晒干)不等。晒干与烘箱干燥马刺鱼的好氧板数和TVB-N差异显著,但属于可接受的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Antibiotics in Milk from Smallholder Farmers from Kenya Shows Traces Above the Recommended Maximum Residue Limits Milling and Bread-Making Traits Associated with Grain Hardness in Ethiopian Bread Wheat Varieties Grown Under Bale Condition Fermented Bamboo Shoot Health Benefits and Applications Development and Shelf-Life Assessment of Fish Sticks Using Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon Idella) The Science of Food Fortification in Improving Health Challenges Due to Iron Deficiency Anemia and Zinc Deficiency for Children Under 5 Years in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1