Preincisional and postoperative epidural morphine, ropivacaine, ketamine, and naloxone treatment for postoperative pain management in upper abdominal surgery

Hou-Chuan Lai , Chung-Bao Hsieh , Chih-Shung Wong , Chun-Chang Yeh , Zhi-Fu Wu
{"title":"Preincisional and postoperative epidural morphine, ropivacaine, ketamine, and naloxone treatment for postoperative pain management in upper abdominal surgery","authors":"Hou-Chuan Lai ,&nbsp;Chung-Bao Hsieh ,&nbsp;Chih-Shung Wong ,&nbsp;Chun-Chang Yeh ,&nbsp;Zhi-Fu Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.aat.2016.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective(s)</h3><p>Previous studies have shown that preincisional epidural morphine, bupivacaine, and ketamine combined with epidural anesthesia (EA) and general anesthesia (GA) provided pre-emptive analgesia for upper abdominal surgery. Recent studies reported that ultralow-dose naloxone enhanced the antinociceptive effect of morphine in rats. This study investigated the benefits of preincisional and postoperative epidural morphine + ropivacaine + ketamine + naloxone (M + R + K + N) treatment for achieving postoperative pain relief in upper abdominal surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eighty American Society of Anesthesiology I–II patients scheduled for major upper abdominal surgery were allocated to four groups in a randomized, single-blinded study. All patients received combined GA and EA with a continuous epidural infusion of 2% lidocaine (6–8 mL/h) 30 minutes after pain regimen. After GA induction, in Group I, an epidural pain control regimen (total 10 mL) was administered using 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg; M + R); in Group II, 1% lidocaine 8 (mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + ketamine (20 mg; M + R + K); in Group III, 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + naloxone (2 μg; M + R + N); and in Group IV, 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + ketamine (20 mg) + naloxone (2 μg; M + R + K + N), respectively. All patients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with different pain regimens to control subsequent postoperative pain for 3 days following surgery. During the 3-day period following surgery, PCEA consumption (mL), numerical rating scale (NRS) score while cough/moving, and analgesic-related adverse effects were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Total PCEA consumption for the 3-day observation period was 161.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->17.8 mL, 103.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->21.7 mL, 152.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->25.6 mL, and 74.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->16.9 mL for Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). The cough/moving NRS scores were significantly lower in Group IV patients than Groups I and III patients at 4 hours, 12 hours, and on Days 1 and 2 following surgery except for Group II (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preincisional and postoperative epidural M + R + K + N treatment provides an ideal postoperative pain management than preincisional and postoperative epidural M + R, M + R + K, and M + R + N treatments in upper abdominal surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87042,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists","volume":"54 3","pages":"Pages 88-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aat.2016.10.004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875459716300686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective(s)

Previous studies have shown that preincisional epidural morphine, bupivacaine, and ketamine combined with epidural anesthesia (EA) and general anesthesia (GA) provided pre-emptive analgesia for upper abdominal surgery. Recent studies reported that ultralow-dose naloxone enhanced the antinociceptive effect of morphine in rats. This study investigated the benefits of preincisional and postoperative epidural morphine + ropivacaine + ketamine + naloxone (M + R + K + N) treatment for achieving postoperative pain relief in upper abdominal surgery.

Methods

Eighty American Society of Anesthesiology I–II patients scheduled for major upper abdominal surgery were allocated to four groups in a randomized, single-blinded study. All patients received combined GA and EA with a continuous epidural infusion of 2% lidocaine (6–8 mL/h) 30 minutes after pain regimen. After GA induction, in Group I, an epidural pain control regimen (total 10 mL) was administered using 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg; M + R); in Group II, 1% lidocaine 8 (mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + ketamine (20 mg; M + R + K); in Group III, 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + naloxone (2 μg; M + R + N); and in Group IV, 1% lidocaine (8 mL) + morphine (2 mg) + ropivacaine (20 mg) + ketamine (20 mg) + naloxone (2 μg; M + R + K + N), respectively. All patients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with different pain regimens to control subsequent postoperative pain for 3 days following surgery. During the 3-day period following surgery, PCEA consumption (mL), numerical rating scale (NRS) score while cough/moving, and analgesic-related adverse effects were recorded.

Results

Total PCEA consumption for the 3-day observation period was 161.5 ± 17.8 mL, 103.2 ± 21.7 mL, 152.4 ± 25.6 mL, and 74.1 ± 16.9 mL for Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. (p < 0.05). The cough/moving NRS scores were significantly lower in Group IV patients than Groups I and III patients at 4 hours, 12 hours, and on Days 1 and 2 following surgery except for Group II (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Preincisional and postoperative epidural M + R + K + N treatment provides an ideal postoperative pain management than preincisional and postoperative epidural M + R, M + R + K, and M + R + N treatments in upper abdominal surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前和术后硬膜外吗啡、罗哌卡因、氯胺酮和纳洛酮治疗对上腹部手术术后疼痛的控制
目的:既往研究表明,术前硬膜外吗啡、布比卡因、氯胺酮联合硬膜外麻醉(EA)和全身麻醉(GA)可为上腹部手术提供先发制人的镇痛。近年来有研究报道,超低剂量纳洛酮可增强吗啡对大鼠的抗伤害感受作用。本研究探讨了术前和术后硬膜外吗啡+罗哌卡因+氯胺酮+纳洛酮(M + R + K + N)治疗对上腹部手术术后疼痛缓解的益处。方法80例美国麻醉学学会I-II期拟行上腹部大手术的患者分为4组,采用随机、单盲研究。所有患者均接受GA和EA联合治疗,并在疼痛治疗后30分钟持续硬膜外输注2%利多卡因(6 - 8ml /h)。GA诱导后,I组采用1%利多卡因(8ml) +吗啡(2mg) +罗哌卡因(20mg)的硬膜外镇痛方案(总10ml);m + r);II组1%利多卡因8 (mL) +吗啡(2mg) +罗哌卡因(20mg) +氯胺酮(20mg);m + r + k);III组1%利多卡因(8 mL) +吗啡(2 mg) +罗哌卡因(20 mg) +纳洛酮(2 μg);m + r + n);IV组1%利多卡因(8 mL) +吗啡(2 mg) +罗哌卡因(20 mg) +氯胺酮(20 mg) +纳洛酮(2 μg);M + R + K + N)。所有患者均在术后3天内采用不同疼痛方案的患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)来控制术后疼痛。术后3天记录患者PCEA消耗(mL)、咳嗽/活动时数值评定量表(NRS)评分及镇痛相关不良反应。结果3 d观察期内,1、2、3、4组患者PCEA总消耗量分别为161.5±17.8 mL、103.2±21.7 mL、152.4±25.6 mL、74.1±16.9 mL。(p & lt;0.05)。除II组患者外,IV组患者在术后4小时、12小时和第1、2天咳嗽/移动NRS评分显著低于I组和III组患者(p <0.05)。结论切口前及术后硬膜外M + R + K + N治疗比切口前及术后硬膜外M + R、M + R + K、M + R + N治疗更理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of perioperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on complications after gastrointestinal surgery: A meta-analysis Quadratus lumborum block intramuscular approach for pediatric surgery Reply to: Respiratory acidosis in obese gynecologic patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery independently of the type of ventilation Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting following gynecological laparoscopy: A comparison of standard anesthetic technique and propofol infusion Severe acute peripheral edema induced by noninvasive blood pressure cuff in an elderly patient with hypoalbuminemia under general anesthesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1