Democratizing the Maker Movement: A Case Study of One Public Library System’s Makerspace Program

IF 0.1 4区 管理学 Q2 Social Sciences Reference & User Services Quarterly Pub Date : 2019-10-25 DOI:10.5860/rusq.58.4.7150
Alexandra Lakind, Rebekah Willett, Erica Halverson
{"title":"Democratizing the Maker Movement: A Case Study of One Public Library System’s Makerspace Program","authors":"Alexandra Lakind, Rebekah Willett, Erica Halverson","doi":"10.5860/rusq.58.4.7150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The maker movement has found a home in public libraries. Field leaders including public libraries in Chicago, Chattanooga, Houston, Louisville, and Toronto have built robust makerspaces, developed maker programming for a diverse range of patrons, connected community experts with library users for the purpose of sharing information, and fostered communities of practice. Characterized by open exploration, intrinsic interest, and creative ideation, the maker movement can be broadly defined as participation in the creative production of physical and digital artifacts in people’s day-to-day lives. The maker movement employs a do-it-yourself orientation toward a range of disciplines, including robotics, woodworking, textiles, and electronics. But the maker ethos also includes a do-it-with-others approach, valuing collaboration, distributed expertise, and open workspaces. To many in the library profession, the values ingrained in the maker movement seem to be shared with the aims and goals of public libraries. However, critiques of the maker movement raise questions about current iterations of makerspaces across settings. This article highlights critiques and responses regarding the “democratic” nature of the maker movement, and in particular, the article analyzes ways librarians involved in a prominent public library maker program discursively construct making and maker programming in relation to the maker movement more generally.","PeriodicalId":45353,"journal":{"name":"Reference & User Services Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reference & User Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.58.4.7150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The maker movement has found a home in public libraries. Field leaders including public libraries in Chicago, Chattanooga, Houston, Louisville, and Toronto have built robust makerspaces, developed maker programming for a diverse range of patrons, connected community experts with library users for the purpose of sharing information, and fostered communities of practice. Characterized by open exploration, intrinsic interest, and creative ideation, the maker movement can be broadly defined as participation in the creative production of physical and digital artifacts in people’s day-to-day lives. The maker movement employs a do-it-yourself orientation toward a range of disciplines, including robotics, woodworking, textiles, and electronics. But the maker ethos also includes a do-it-with-others approach, valuing collaboration, distributed expertise, and open workspaces. To many in the library profession, the values ingrained in the maker movement seem to be shared with the aims and goals of public libraries. However, critiques of the maker movement raise questions about current iterations of makerspaces across settings. This article highlights critiques and responses regarding the “democratic” nature of the maker movement, and in particular, the article analyzes ways librarians involved in a prominent public library maker program discursively construct making and maker programming in relation to the maker movement more generally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创客运动的民主化:以某公共图书馆系统的创客空间项目为例
创客运动在公共图书馆找到了归宿。包括芝加哥、查塔努加、休斯顿、路易斯维尔和多伦多的公共图书馆在内的领域领导者已经建立了强大的创客空间,为各种各样的用户开发了创客编程,将社区专家与图书馆用户联系起来,以共享信息,并培养了实践社区。创客运动具有开放性的探索、内在的兴趣和创造性的想法,可以广义地定义为参与日常生活中实物和数字文物的创造性生产。创客运动在一系列学科中采用自己动手的方向,包括机器人、木工、纺织品和电子产品。但创客精神还包括与他人合作的方式,重视协作、分布式专业知识和开放的工作空间。对于许多图书馆从业人员来说,创客运动中根深蒂固的价值观似乎与公共图书馆的宗旨和目标是一致的。然而,对创客运动的批评提出了关于当前不同设置的创客空间迭代的问题。本文重点介绍了对创客运动的“民主”性质的批评和回应,特别是,文章分析了参与一个著名公共图书馆创客计划的图书馆员如何在更广泛的意义上构建与创客运动相关的制作和创客编程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reference & User Services Quarterly
Reference & User Services Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Reference & User Services Quarterly is the official journal of the Reference and User Services Association of the American Library Association. Its purpose is to disseminate information of interest to reference librarians, information specialists, and other professionals involved in user-oriented library services. This Web site serves as an online companion to the print edition.
期刊最新文献
Information Literacy and Instruction: Using Universal Design for Instruction to Make Library Instruction Accessible The Alert Collector: Scams and Flimflam: The Other True Crime Information Literacy and Instruction: Building a Multi-Format Graduate Student Information Literacy Program Readers’ Advisory: Readers’ Advisory and the Pandemic: Lessons, Connections, and Vital Services Amplify Your Impact: Reframing Reference as Outreach: Expanding Engagement and Inclusion Through Reference Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1