Effect of envelope characteristics on the accuracy of discretized greenhouse model in TRNSYS

IF 2.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Journal of Agricultural Engineering Pub Date : 2022-07-07 DOI:10.4081/jae.2022.1420
Q. O. Ogunlowo, W. Na, A. Rabiu, M. A. Adesanya, T. D. Akpenpuun, H. Kim, Hyun Woo Lee
{"title":"Effect of envelope characteristics on the accuracy of discretized greenhouse model in TRNSYS","authors":"Q. O. Ogunlowo, W. Na, A. Rabiu, M. A. Adesanya, T. D. Akpenpuun, H. Kim, Hyun Woo Lee","doi":"10.4081/jae.2022.1420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TRNSYS is a common tool that has been recently used to model and simulate greenhouse energy demand and utilization using building energy simulation (BES). Previously, a single thermal point was used for validation, ignoring the distribution of greenhouse climate parameters, especially the temperature. Temperature variation often leads to thermal stratification, prompting researchers to propose volume discretization in dynamic greenhouse simulations. In this context, the effect of envelope characterization on the accuracy of discretized TRNSYS BES model was developed to determine the best BES model under a free-floating regime. The combination of the number of layers [double (D) and single (S)], geometry mode [3D and manual (M)], and layer type [massless (M) and no glazing window (W)], led to the development of five models: D_3D_M, D_3D_W, D_M_M, S_3D_W, and S_M_M. The simulation was performed in a standard radiation mode, and the output parameters were temperature and relative humidity (RH). R2 and the root square mean error (RSME) were used to check the fitness and degree of deviation, respectively, to validate the models. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to investigate the significant differences among the models, whereas contour plots were used to compare the distribution pattern between the significant models and experimental data. Validation of the models showed that the obtained R2 values ranged from 0.86 to 0.95, and the RSME values for the temperature were between 2.64 °C and 3.91 °C. These values were 0.91–0.93 and 19.72%–30.32% for RH. The ANOVA (p < 0.05) result exhibited significant differences between the S-scenario models and experimental central points in temperature and RH. The D- and S-layer scenarios with a 3D geometry and massless layer showed similar distribution with their corresponding experimental greenhouses. Hence, 3D_M was regarded as the best combination in the discretized BES model.","PeriodicalId":48507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2022.1420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

TRNSYS is a common tool that has been recently used to model and simulate greenhouse energy demand and utilization using building energy simulation (BES). Previously, a single thermal point was used for validation, ignoring the distribution of greenhouse climate parameters, especially the temperature. Temperature variation often leads to thermal stratification, prompting researchers to propose volume discretization in dynamic greenhouse simulations. In this context, the effect of envelope characterization on the accuracy of discretized TRNSYS BES model was developed to determine the best BES model under a free-floating regime. The combination of the number of layers [double (D) and single (S)], geometry mode [3D and manual (M)], and layer type [massless (M) and no glazing window (W)], led to the development of five models: D_3D_M, D_3D_W, D_M_M, S_3D_W, and S_M_M. The simulation was performed in a standard radiation mode, and the output parameters were temperature and relative humidity (RH). R2 and the root square mean error (RSME) were used to check the fitness and degree of deviation, respectively, to validate the models. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to investigate the significant differences among the models, whereas contour plots were used to compare the distribution pattern between the significant models and experimental data. Validation of the models showed that the obtained R2 values ranged from 0.86 to 0.95, and the RSME values for the temperature were between 2.64 °C and 3.91 °C. These values were 0.91–0.93 and 19.72%–30.32% for RH. The ANOVA (p < 0.05) result exhibited significant differences between the S-scenario models and experimental central points in temperature and RH. The D- and S-layer scenarios with a 3D geometry and massless layer showed similar distribution with their corresponding experimental greenhouses. Hence, 3D_M was regarded as the best combination in the discretized BES model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包络特性对TRNSYS离散化温室模型精度的影响
TRNSYS是最近使用建筑能源模拟(BES)来模拟和模拟温室能源需求和利用的常用工具。以往采用单热点进行验证,忽略了温室气候参数尤其是温度的分布。温度变化经常导致热分层,促使研究人员提出在动态温室模拟中的体积离散化。在此背景下,研究了包络特征对离散化TRNSYS BES模型精度的影响,以确定自由浮动状态下的最佳BES模型。结合层数[双(D)和单(S)]、几何模式[3D和手动(M)]和层类型[无质量(M)和无玻璃窗(W)],形成了D_3D_M、D_3D_W、D_M_M、S_3D_W和S_M_M五种模型。模拟在标准辐射模式下进行,输出参数为温度和相对湿度(RH)。采用R2和均方根误差(RSME)分别检验拟合度和偏离度,对模型进行验证。采用方差分析(ANOVA)分析模型间的显著性差异,采用等高线图比较显著性模型与实验数据之间的分布格局。模型的验证表明,得到的R2值在0.86 ~ 0.95之间,温度的RSME值在2.64 ~ 3.91℃之间。RH值分别为0.91 ~ 0.93和19.72% ~ 30.32%。方差分析(ANOVA)结果显示,s情景模型与实验中心点在温度和相对湿度方面存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。具有三维几何和无质量层的D层和s层场景与其相应的实验温室的分布相似。因此,3D_M被认为是离散化BES模型中的最佳组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Journal of Agricultural Engineering AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural Engineering (JAE) is the official journal of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering supported by University of Bologna, Italy. The subject matter covers a complete and interdisciplinary range of research in engineering for agriculture and biosystems.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of two different artificial neural network models for prediction of soil penetration resistance Apple recognition and picking sequence planning for harvesting robot in the complex environment Monitoring and multi-scenario simulation of agricultural land changes using Landsat imageries and FLUS model on coastal Alanya Variable-rate spray system for unmanned aerial applications using lag compensation algorithm and pulse width modulation spray technology Comparative analysis of 2D and 3D vineyard yield prediction system using artificial intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1