The Influence of Three Root Canal Irrigation Methods on PostThe Influence of Three Root Canal Irrigation Methods on PostOperative Pain “Randomized Clinical Trial”

Nouran ElAfify
{"title":"The Influence of Three Root Canal Irrigation Methods on PostThe Influence of Three Root Canal Irrigation Methods on PostOperative Pain “Randomized Clinical Trial”","authors":"Nouran ElAfify","doi":"10.54623/fdj.7021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endodontics Aim: This clinical study was designated to evaluate the influence of three root canal irrigation activation methods on postoperative pain using the Visual Analogue Scale VAS. Material and Methods: 78 patients having symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular first molar with no periapical involvement. ProTaper Next rotary files were used for root canal preparation, the cases were then divided randomly into three equal groups based on the final irrigation agitation technique, with each group having 26 cases. (n=26 ). Group A: received irrigation with 2.6% sodium hypochlorite with NaviTip (31- gauge 27 mm) with double side port irrigator tip (SVN) without any agitation; Group B: received irrigation with 2.6% sodium hypochlorite with final mechanical agitation of irrigation with ultrasonic device activation (Endo ultra) (PUI) Group C: received irrigation with 2.6% sodium hypochlorite with final mechanical agitation of irrigation with sonic device activation (EDDY). Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), postoperative pain was evaluated at intervals of 6,12,24,72 hours and 7 days. Results: Overall results of study showed ,At the first (6,12,24 hours) there was a significant difference between the groups in pain incidence and intensity where group A showed more pain scores than group B and group C. At (48, 72 hours and 7 days) there were no significant difference between the groups where pain scores declined among the groups till it reaches nearly score (0) at 7 day. Conclusion: group A (SVN) showed highest postoperative pain in the first 24 hours in comparison with the other groups, where the pain level decreased gradually in all groups after 24 hours.","PeriodicalId":100562,"journal":{"name":"Future Dental Journal","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.7021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Endodontics Aim: This clinical study was designated to evaluate the influence of three root canal irrigation activation methods on postoperative pain using the Visual Analogue Scale VAS. Material and Methods: 78 patients having symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular first molar with no periapical involvement. ProTaper Next rotary files were used for root canal preparation, the cases were then divided randomly into three equal groups based on the final irrigation agitation technique, with each group having 26 cases. (n=26 ). Group A: received irrigation with 2.6% sodium hypochlorite with NaviTip (31- gauge 27 mm) with double side port irrigator tip (SVN) without any agitation; Group B: received irrigation with 2.6% sodium hypochlorite with final mechanical agitation of irrigation with ultrasonic device activation (Endo ultra) (PUI) Group C: received irrigation with 2.6% sodium hypochlorite with final mechanical agitation of irrigation with sonic device activation (EDDY). Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), postoperative pain was evaluated at intervals of 6,12,24,72 hours and 7 days. Results: Overall results of study showed ,At the first (6,12,24 hours) there was a significant difference between the groups in pain incidence and intensity where group A showed more pain scores than group B and group C. At (48, 72 hours and 7 days) there were no significant difference between the groups where pain scores declined among the groups till it reaches nearly score (0) at 7 day. Conclusion: group A (SVN) showed highest postoperative pain in the first 24 hours in comparison with the other groups, where the pain level decreased gradually in all groups after 24 hours.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种根管冲洗方式对术后疼痛的影响三种根管冲洗方式对术后疼痛的影响“随机临床试验”
目的:本临床研究采用视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scale VAS)评价三种根管灌洗激活方式对术后疼痛的影响。材料与方法:78例未累及根尖周的下颌第一磨牙症状性不可逆牙髓炎患者。采用ProTaper Next旋转锉进行根管预备,根据最终灌洗搅拌技术随机分为3组,每组26例。(n = 26)。A组:使用NaviTip (31- gauge 27mm)和SVN双侧口灌头(SVN)进行2.6%次氯酸钠灌洗,无搅拌;B组:2.6%次氯酸钠灌水,最后机械搅拌超声装置激活(Endo ultra) (PUI)灌水。C组:2.6%次氯酸钠灌水,最后机械搅拌超声装置激活(EDDY)灌水。采用视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scale, VAS),分别于术后6、12、24、72小时和7天进行疼痛评估。结果:总体研究结果显示,在治疗初期(6、12、24小时),各组疼痛发生率和强度差异有统计学意义,其中a组疼痛评分高于B组和c组。在治疗初期(48、72小时、7天),各组疼痛评分下降,至7天接近0分,组间差异无统计学意义。结论:A组(SVN)术后24小时疼痛程度最高,24小时后各组疼痛程度逐渐减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring Accuracy of Dolphin Imaging Software in predicting upper jaw soft tissue profile changes in Class II Adult Patients treated with Extraction versus Non-Extraction Success of Early Childhood Caries After Treatment with Silver Diamine Fluoride Compared to conventional Glass Ionomer Restoration. A Systematic Review Comparison of Alignment Duration Between 0.018” And 0.022” Slot Brackets in Non-Extraction Orthodontic Adult Patients: A Randomized Clinical Study The Efficiency of Passive Ultrasonic Activated Irrigation on the Retrievability of Guttaflow Bioseal : In Vitro Study Radiographic Analysis of Umbrella Technique Combined with Sticky Bone in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1