Decision-making and resilience in agriculture: improving awareness of the role of accounting

IF 3.5 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Meditari Accountancy Research Pub Date : 2023-01-11 DOI:10.1108/medar-05-2022-1679
Joanne L. Tingey-Holyoak, S. Wheeler, Constantin Seidl
{"title":"Decision-making and resilience in agriculture: improving awareness of the role of accounting","authors":"Joanne L. Tingey-Holyoak, S. Wheeler, Constantin Seidl","doi":"10.1108/medar-05-2022-1679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAustralian agriculture is facing increasingly uncertain weather patterns which is impacting financial performance, exacerbated by worsening terms of trade and a decline in commodity prices. Increasing the resilience and adaptive capacity of the primary production sector is of key importance. Governments and farmer groups often depict technology adoption as the salvation of farming, frequently ignoring the importance of decision-making processes and soft information skills and needs. The purpose of this study is to explore farmer decision-making and resilience and, in doing so, address ongoing challenges with soft information, including the inaccessibility of accounting data and a lack of awareness of its formal role in strategic decisions.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nDrawing on a strategic choice perspective, we explore the links between farmer characteristics, attitudes, technology orientation, decision-making and financial performance to investigate how accounting data and tools could better support growers’ adaptive capacity. Detailed on-farm interviews were conducted with 25 grape growers across the Riverland in South Australia, with information thematically and descriptively analysed.\n\n\nFindings\nResults show that farmers with low operating profit margins spend double the time making decisions and struggle with minimising variable costs, especially water costs. Lower profit growers were also less likely to perceive climate change as a threat and demonstrated lower resilience.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results highlight the potential for accountants to make more use of data-driven technological advances and for this information to be used to enhance on-farm strategic decision-making and support innovative business models. Simply packaged biophysical and financial data could also support strategic decisions and adaptation of farmers struggling to make a profit.\n","PeriodicalId":18453,"journal":{"name":"Meditari Accountancy Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meditari Accountancy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-05-2022-1679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Australian agriculture is facing increasingly uncertain weather patterns which is impacting financial performance, exacerbated by worsening terms of trade and a decline in commodity prices. Increasing the resilience and adaptive capacity of the primary production sector is of key importance. Governments and farmer groups often depict technology adoption as the salvation of farming, frequently ignoring the importance of decision-making processes and soft information skills and needs. The purpose of this study is to explore farmer decision-making and resilience and, in doing so, address ongoing challenges with soft information, including the inaccessibility of accounting data and a lack of awareness of its formal role in strategic decisions. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on a strategic choice perspective, we explore the links between farmer characteristics, attitudes, technology orientation, decision-making and financial performance to investigate how accounting data and tools could better support growers’ adaptive capacity. Detailed on-farm interviews were conducted with 25 grape growers across the Riverland in South Australia, with information thematically and descriptively analysed. Findings Results show that farmers with low operating profit margins spend double the time making decisions and struggle with minimising variable costs, especially water costs. Lower profit growers were also less likely to perceive climate change as a threat and demonstrated lower resilience. Originality/value The results highlight the potential for accountants to make more use of data-driven technological advances and for this information to be used to enhance on-farm strategic decision-making and support innovative business models. Simply packaged biophysical and financial data could also support strategic decisions and adaptation of farmers struggling to make a profit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业决策与弹性:提高对会计作用的认识
目的:澳大利亚农业正面临着越来越不确定的天气模式,这正在影响其财务业绩,而贸易条件的恶化和大宗商品价格的下跌又加剧了这一影响。提高初级生产部门的复原力和适应能力至关重要。政府和农民团体经常将技术采用描述为农业的拯救,经常忽视决策过程和软信息技能和需求的重要性。本研究的目的是探讨农民的决策和弹性,并在此过程中,解决软信息的持续挑战,包括会计数据的不可获取性和缺乏对其在战略决策中的正式作用的认识。设计/方法/途径从战略选择的角度出发,我们探讨了农民特征、态度、技术取向、决策和财务绩效之间的联系,以研究会计数据和工具如何更好地支持种植者的适应能力。详细的农场采访进行了25葡萄种植者在南澳大利亚河地,信息主题和描述性分析。研究结果表明,经营利润率较低的农民在做决策时花费的时间增加了一倍,并努力将可变成本(尤其是水成本)降至最低。利润较低的种植者也不太可能将气候变化视为威胁,并且表现出较低的适应能力。独创性/价值研究结果强调了会计师更多地利用数据驱动的技术进步,并利用这些信息加强农场战略决策和支持创新商业模式的潜力。简单打包的生物物理和金融数据也可以支持努力盈利的农民的战略决策和适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Meditari Accountancy Research
Meditari Accountancy Research BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Meditari Accountancy Research (MEDAR). MEDAR takes its name from the Latin for constantly pondering, suggesting a journey towards a better understanding of accountancy related matters through research. Innovative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. The journal is a double blind refereed publication that welcomes manuscripts using diverse research methods that address a wide range of accountancy related topics, where the terms accountancy and accounting are interpreted broadly. Manuscripts should be theoretically underpinned. Topics may include, but are not limited to: Auditing, Financial reporting, Impact of accounting on organizations, Impact of accounting on capital markets, Impact of accounting on individuals, Management accounting, Public sector accounting, Regulation of the profession, Risk management, Social and environmental disclosure, Impact of taxation on society, Accounting education, Accounting ethics.
期刊最新文献
Company reputation and dividend payout Social media usage for sustainability reporting: a study of the Top 50 Australian companies Knowledge equity as social justice in academic publishing and why it matters for accounting research Terror and taxes: how attacks impact corporate tax avoidance Does female board directorship affect the quality of KPI voluntary disclosure? Some evidence from French family firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1