Integrated Effect of Fertilizers on Soil pH, EC and Organic Matter Content

حسين عبدالسلام مخلوف, حسن عبدالمولي محمد, جمعه احمد لبيب, مفتاح علي امحمد
{"title":"Integrated Effect of Fertilizers on Soil pH, EC and Organic Matter Content","authors":"حسين عبدالسلام مخلوف, حسن عبدالمولي محمد, جمعه احمد لبيب, مفتاح علي امحمد","doi":"10.51984/jopas.v21i4.2428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two field experiments in split-plot design were carried out in the winter season of  2014-2015 at Mansoura University Farm, Egypt, to investigate the effect of biochar, compost, and chicken manure with different rates of mineral fertilization on soil pH, EC, and organic matter content. Treatments of organic were biochar, compost, and chicken manure, while the studied mineral fertilizer treatments (NPK) took with rates of 50,75,100, and 125 %. The obtained results can be summarized in; biochar, addition led to an increase in the pH of wheat (Sakha 68) soil by 8.73 %, compost, and chicken manure decreased the pH of wheat soil by 8.30 and 8.19% compared with 0.0 organic addition, where the same amendment with the same order increased pH of barley (Gemmiza 123) soil by 8.65, and reduce with 8.30 and 8.18% of compost and chicken manure. Biochar, compost, and chicken manure treatments increased values of  EC 2 , 2.43, and 2.10 dS m-1 of wheat soil and 2.80, 2.23, and 2.14 dS m-1 of barley, respectively. Organic matter improved and the highest result was found with chicken manure 2.798 and 2.767 % of wheat and barley soil. Mineral fertilizer decreased both pH of wheat and barley soil as well as increased EC and organic matter up to the highest level used. A significant organic fertilizer type - mineral fertilization dose interaction was found with the most of tested treatments. The highest effect on pH in soil paste was found in the interactions between biochar with mineral treatments compared to other treatments of both wheat and barley soil. The best mean value of EC was recoded with the interaction between compost and 100 % NPK treatment (2.76 dS m-1) of wheat soil, a similar trend was also achieved with barley soil (3.29 dS m-1). Chicken manure -125 % of recommended NPK treatment gave the heights values of wheat and barley organic matter content, 2.798 and 2.767 %.  Respectively.  ","PeriodicalId":16911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51984/jopas.v21i4.2428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Two field experiments in split-plot design were carried out in the winter season of  2014-2015 at Mansoura University Farm, Egypt, to investigate the effect of biochar, compost, and chicken manure with different rates of mineral fertilization on soil pH, EC, and organic matter content. Treatments of organic were biochar, compost, and chicken manure, while the studied mineral fertilizer treatments (NPK) took with rates of 50,75,100, and 125 %. The obtained results can be summarized in; biochar, addition led to an increase in the pH of wheat (Sakha 68) soil by 8.73 %, compost, and chicken manure decreased the pH of wheat soil by 8.30 and 8.19% compared with 0.0 organic addition, where the same amendment with the same order increased pH of barley (Gemmiza 123) soil by 8.65, and reduce with 8.30 and 8.18% of compost and chicken manure. Biochar, compost, and chicken manure treatments increased values of  EC 2 , 2.43, and 2.10 dS m-1 of wheat soil and 2.80, 2.23, and 2.14 dS m-1 of barley, respectively. Organic matter improved and the highest result was found with chicken manure 2.798 and 2.767 % of wheat and barley soil. Mineral fertilizer decreased both pH of wheat and barley soil as well as increased EC and organic matter up to the highest level used. A significant organic fertilizer type - mineral fertilization dose interaction was found with the most of tested treatments. The highest effect on pH in soil paste was found in the interactions between biochar with mineral treatments compared to other treatments of both wheat and barley soil. The best mean value of EC was recoded with the interaction between compost and 100 % NPK treatment (2.76 dS m-1) of wheat soil, a similar trend was also achieved with barley soil (3.29 dS m-1). Chicken manure -125 % of recommended NPK treatment gave the heights values of wheat and barley organic matter content, 2.798 and 2.767 %.  Respectively.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥料对土壤pH、EC和有机质含量的综合影响
2014-2015年冬季,在埃及Mansoura University农场采用分块设计进行了2个田间试验,研究了生物炭、堆肥和鸡粪在不同矿肥配比下对土壤pH、EC和有机质含量的影响。治疗的有机生物炭、堆肥和鸡粪,而研究矿物肥料治疗(氮磷钾)与利率50,75100,125%。所得结果可归纳为:添加生物炭使小麦(Sakha 68)土壤pH升高8.73%,添加堆肥和鸡粪使小麦土壤pH降低8.30%和8.19%,添加相同阶次的相同改进剂使大麦(Gemmiza 123)土壤pH升高8.65%,添加堆肥和鸡粪使土壤pH降低8.30%和8.18%。生物炭、堆肥和鸡粪处理分别提高了小麦土壤的ec2、2.43和2.10 dS m-1和大麦土壤的2.80、2.23和2.14 dS m-1。其中鸡粪土壤有机质含量为2.798 %,小麦和大麦土壤有机质含量为2.767 %。施用矿肥后,小麦和大麦土壤pH值均降低,土壤有机质和EC均增加。在大多数试验处理中,有机肥类型与矿肥剂量之间存在显著的交互作用。与小麦和大麦土壤的其他处理相比,生物炭与矿物处理之间的相互作用对土壤膏体pH的影响最大。堆肥与100%氮磷钾交互作用的平均EC值以小麦土为最佳(2.76 dS m-1),大麦土为最佳(3.29 dS m-1)。鸡粪- 125%推荐氮磷钾处理,小麦和大麦有机质含量分别为2.798和2.767%。分别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrating ChatGPT in Education and Learning: A Case Study on Libyan Universities The awareness of thyroid disorders and an iodine-rich diet among a sample of the population in some western cities of Libya التنوع الحيوي للهائمات الحيوانية في بحيرة محروقة منطقة الشاطئ-ليبيا تطبيق قواعد الأسبقية في تنفيذ الأعمال لغرض توازن خطوط التجميع باستخدام الجداول الإلكترونية تقدير البخر نتح المرجعي باستخدام نظام استدلال عصبي ضبابي مكيف بمنطقة شحات في ليبيا
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1