Fantasies of Mitte: Mittellage and mitteleuropa in German geographical discussion in the 19th and 20th centuries

Hans-Dietrich Schultz
{"title":"Fantasies of Mitte: Mittellage and mitteleuropa in German geographical discussion in the 19th and 20th centuries","authors":"Hans-Dietrich Schultz","doi":"10.1016/0260-9827(89)90030-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lately, German intellectuals have once again begun making reference to geographical constants. This is by no means innocuous, for the key terms in this discussion—Germany's <em>Mittellage</em> (central position) and <em>Mitteleuropa</em> (Central Europe)—are lodged in historical memory as representatives of Germany's striving for power and hegemony, a goal of German foreign policy since Wilhelminian imperialism until as late as 1945. A look at the history of geography shows that this reference to geographical constants is impermissible. <em>Mittellage and Mitteleuropa</em>, also, were not employed in a politically neutral manner. Using the <em>Mittellage</em> concept, Germany was given a special role in Europe which, in accordance with historical circumstances, could assume a defensive or offensive aspect. <em>Mitteleuropa</em> was originally a broad tract of land extending from the French Atlantic coast to the Black Sea or Ural Mountains, separating Nonhern and Southern Europe. With the founding of the German Reich (1871), the <em>Mitteleuropa</em> concept, too, became a political character. Consequently, the German striving for hegemony acquired the aspect of scientifically founded necessity. After 1945, instead of critical approach to the misuse of <em>Mittellage</em> and <em>Mitteleuropa</em>, geographers lamented that once again Germany had become a victim of its <em>Mittellage</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101034,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography Quarterly","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 315-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0260-9827(89)90030-X","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026098278990030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Lately, German intellectuals have once again begun making reference to geographical constants. This is by no means innocuous, for the key terms in this discussion—Germany's Mittellage (central position) and Mitteleuropa (Central Europe)—are lodged in historical memory as representatives of Germany's striving for power and hegemony, a goal of German foreign policy since Wilhelminian imperialism until as late as 1945. A look at the history of geography shows that this reference to geographical constants is impermissible. Mittellage and Mitteleuropa, also, were not employed in a politically neutral manner. Using the Mittellage concept, Germany was given a special role in Europe which, in accordance with historical circumstances, could assume a defensive or offensive aspect. Mitteleuropa was originally a broad tract of land extending from the French Atlantic coast to the Black Sea or Ural Mountains, separating Nonhern and Southern Europe. With the founding of the German Reich (1871), the Mitteleuropa concept, too, became a political character. Consequently, the German striving for hegemony acquired the aspect of scientifically founded necessity. After 1945, instead of critical approach to the misuse of Mittellage and Mitteleuropa, geographers lamented that once again Germany had become a victim of its Mittellage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米特的幻想:19世纪和20世纪德国地理讨论中的米特拉奇和中欧
最近,德国知识分子又一次开始提及地理常数。这绝不是无害的,因为这场讨论的关键术语——德国的中心地位(Mittellage)和中欧(Mitteleuropa)——作为德国争取权力和霸权的代表而被载入历史记忆,这是自威廉帝国主义以来直到1945年德国外交政策的目标。回顾一下地理学的历史就会发现,这种引用地理常数的做法是不允许的。Mittellage和Mitteleuropa也不是以政治中立的方式使用的。根据中特拉奇的概念,德国在欧洲被赋予了一个特殊的角色,根据历史情况,可以承担防御或进攻的角色。中欧最初是一片广阔的土地,从法国大西洋海岸延伸到黑海或乌拉尔山脉,将北欧和南欧分开。随着德意志帝国的建立(1871年),中欧概念也成为一种政治特征。因此,德国对霸权的争夺就具有了科学必然性。1945年之后,地理学家们不再对滥用Mittellage和Mitteleuropa进行批判,而是哀叹德国再次成为Mittellage的受害者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interstate conflict over exchanges of homeland territory, 1816–1980 The global environmental movement: Reclaiming paradise The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth The new geopolitics of minerals: Canada and international resource trade Caring for workers' dependents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1