Planes, Plateaus, and The Faerie Queene: Spenser with Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari

Q1 Arts and Humanities Spenser Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1086/722429
Yulia Ryzhik
{"title":"Planes, Plateaus, and The Faerie Queene: Spenser with Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari","authors":"Yulia Ryzhik","doi":"10.1086/722429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What might Spenser’s allegory be capable of if it were described as a rhizome rather than a tree? Taking its cue from Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s A Thousand Plateaus, this essay attempts a “rhizomatic” reading of The Faerie Queene. At first, the two works appear incompatible: binary, hierarchical signification, which is paramount to Spenser’s allegory and constitutes its vertical dimension, is anathema to Deleuze and Guattari’s leveling methodology. Yet in its horizontal dimension, its narrative, The Faerie Queene—not unlike A Thousand Plateaus—has a rhizomatic structure, which provokes a hermeneutic response and creates a network of connections between distant nodes. This essay reads the Cave of Mammon as a Spenserian “plateau,” or “hyper-allegorical space,” in which the planes of signification multiply, converge, and become flexible and interpermeable. Paradoxically, when the rhizome overtakes allegory, it becomes no less restrictive than the system it challenges, but Spenser also offers a glimpse of a possible escape from the allegorical machine.","PeriodicalId":39606,"journal":{"name":"Spenser Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spenser Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What might Spenser’s allegory be capable of if it were described as a rhizome rather than a tree? Taking its cue from Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s A Thousand Plateaus, this essay attempts a “rhizomatic” reading of The Faerie Queene. At first, the two works appear incompatible: binary, hierarchical signification, which is paramount to Spenser’s allegory and constitutes its vertical dimension, is anathema to Deleuze and Guattari’s leveling methodology. Yet in its horizontal dimension, its narrative, The Faerie Queene—not unlike A Thousand Plateaus—has a rhizomatic structure, which provokes a hermeneutic response and creates a network of connections between distant nodes. This essay reads the Cave of Mammon as a Spenserian “plateau,” or “hyper-allegorical space,” in which the planes of signification multiply, converge, and become flexible and interpermeable. Paradoxically, when the rhizome overtakes allegory, it becomes no less restrictive than the system it challenges, but Spenser also offers a glimpse of a possible escape from the allegorical machine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
飞机,高原和仙后:斯宾塞与吉尔·德勒兹和fsamlix Guattari
如果斯宾塞的寓言被描述为一根根茎而不是一棵树,它会有什么能力呢?本文以吉尔·德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)和f lix Guattari的《一千高原》(A Thousand plateau)为灵感,试图对《仙后》(The fairy queen)进行“根茎式”解读。起初,这两部作品似乎是不相容的:二元的、等级的意义,对斯宾塞的寓言至关重要,构成了它的垂直维度,是德勒兹和瓜塔里的水平方法论的诅咒。《仙后》的横向叙事与《千高原》没什么不同,它有一个根茎状的结构,激发了一种解释学的反应,并在遥远的节点之间建立了一个连接网络。本文将《财神洞》解读为斯宾塞式的“高原”或“超寓言空间”,在这个空间中,意义的平面成倍增加,汇聚,变得灵活和相互渗透。矛盾的是,当根茎超越寓言时,它的限制并不比它所挑战的系统少,但斯宾塞也提供了一个可能逃离寓言机器的一瞥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spenser Studies
Spenser Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Matter “Soveraigne place”: Spenser with Henri Lefebvre Thinking through Symbionts: Spenser with Donna Haraway On Dissonance and Late Style: Spenser with Theodor W. Adorno In the Person of the Author: A Response to “Imagined Companions”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1