Discourses of Exclusion: Dominant Self-Definitions and "The Other" In German Society

Jens Schneider
{"title":"Discourses of Exclusion: Dominant Self-Definitions and \"The Other\" In German Society","authors":"Jens Schneider","doi":"10.1525/jsae.2002.2.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Definitions of identity, which describe its dynamic and complex character, were formulated especially by those academic fields which set their focus predominantly, and often exclusively, on minorities or the excluded: e.g. feminist theory, Cultural Studies and antiracism. But the theory of identity politics as a field of struggle for self-positioning should also apply to dominant and majority identity constructions. Moreover, we can observe a close relationship between minority and dominant discourses of belonging. Taking some results of field research in Berlin as illustration, the article shows, how identity constructions of young German discursive elites' depend on the construction of specific minority groups as 'Non-Germans. At the same time, these dominant constructions fundamentally structure the field, in which minority groups are obliged to move for their self-definitions. These self-definitions thus cannot be fully understood without a close analysis of the role they play within the identity constructions of 'the majority'.</p>","PeriodicalId":100848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/jsae.2002.2.1.13","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/jsae.2002.2.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Definitions of identity, which describe its dynamic and complex character, were formulated especially by those academic fields which set their focus predominantly, and often exclusively, on minorities or the excluded: e.g. feminist theory, Cultural Studies and antiracism. But the theory of identity politics as a field of struggle for self-positioning should also apply to dominant and majority identity constructions. Moreover, we can observe a close relationship between minority and dominant discourses of belonging. Taking some results of field research in Berlin as illustration, the article shows, how identity constructions of young German discursive elites' depend on the construction of specific minority groups as 'Non-Germans. At the same time, these dominant constructions fundamentally structure the field, in which minority groups are obliged to move for their self-definitions. These self-definitions thus cannot be fully understood without a close analysis of the role they play within the identity constructions of 'the majority'.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
排他话语:德国社会中占主导地位的自我定义与“他者”
身份的定义描述了其动态和复杂的特征,这些定义是由那些主要关注少数群体或被排斥者的学术领域制定的,例如女权主义理论、文化研究和反种族主义。但是,作为自我定位斗争领域的身份政治理论也应该适用于主导和多数人的身份建构。此外,我们还可以观察到归属的少数话语与主流话语之间的密切关系。本文以柏林的一些实地研究结果为例,说明德国青年话语精英的身份建构如何依赖于特定少数群体作为“非德国人”的建构。与此同时,这些主导结构从根本上构建了这个领域,在这个领域中,少数群体不得不为自己的自我定义而移动。因此,如果不仔细分析他们在“多数人”的身份结构中所扮演的角色,就不能完全理解这些自我定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
News Networks in Seventeenth Century Britain and Europe. Joad Raymond, editor. Jews and Europe in the Twenty-First Century: ‘Thinking Jewish.’ Nick Lambert and David Cesarini. Around the Tuscan Table: Food, Family, and Gender in Twentieth-Century Florence. Carole Counihan. Coming to terms through Cinema: The Lives of Others in Germany's Cultural Landscape of Memory Bulgaria at the Cross-Roads of Post-socialism and EU Membership: Generational Dimensions to European Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1