V. Zeitoun, Winayalai Chinnawut, R. Debruyne, P. Auetrakulvit
{"title":"Assessing the occurrence of Stegodon and Elephas in China and Southeast Asia during the Early Pleistocene","authors":"V. Zeitoun, Winayalai Chinnawut, R. Debruyne, P. Auetrakulvit","doi":"10.2113/GSSGFBULL.186.6.413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fossil record is assumed to point to different ecologies, extinction times and ’last stands’ in different regions of the world for Proboscideans, and in some regions, human-proboscidean interaction may theoretically have covered a time span of up to two million years. This paper focuses on the Early Pleistocene of China and Southeast Asia, where the Ailuropoda-Stegodon complex is considered to be a chronologically significant faunal association in the following period. However, the stratigraphic contexts of these local faunal complexes require clarification. Indeed, after one century of research to establish a regional biostratigraphy and in spite of the recomandations provided in the 1980s, many geochronological surveys were undertaken in the 1990s but many problems still exist. Thus, as a first step, taking into consideration the uncertain nature of the geological, taphonomic and chronological data, this paper proposes a critical review of the validity of the associations of Stegodon and Elephas during the Early Pleistocene for this geographical area. Finally, it was necessary to expose what are the current problems before to try to solve them rather than to pursue an unfounded headlong rush. This review concludes that very few reliable data are available and that high-level resolution (MIS) palaeoecological modelization is almost impossible, severely hindering any discussions of strict interaction between humans and proboscideans.","PeriodicalId":55978,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France","volume":"245 1","pages":"413-427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2113/GSSGFBULL.186.6.413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
The fossil record is assumed to point to different ecologies, extinction times and ’last stands’ in different regions of the world for Proboscideans, and in some regions, human-proboscidean interaction may theoretically have covered a time span of up to two million years. This paper focuses on the Early Pleistocene of China and Southeast Asia, where the Ailuropoda-Stegodon complex is considered to be a chronologically significant faunal association in the following period. However, the stratigraphic contexts of these local faunal complexes require clarification. Indeed, after one century of research to establish a regional biostratigraphy and in spite of the recomandations provided in the 1980s, many geochronological surveys were undertaken in the 1990s but many problems still exist. Thus, as a first step, taking into consideration the uncertain nature of the geological, taphonomic and chronological data, this paper proposes a critical review of the validity of the associations of Stegodon and Elephas during the Early Pleistocene for this geographical area. Finally, it was necessary to expose what are the current problems before to try to solve them rather than to pursue an unfounded headlong rush. This review concludes that very few reliable data are available and that high-level resolution (MIS) palaeoecological modelization is almost impossible, severely hindering any discussions of strict interaction between humans and proboscideans.
期刊介绍:
BSGF - Earth Sciences Bulletin publie plusieurs types de contributions :
1. des articles originaux, couvrant tous les champs disciplinaires des Géosciences, à vocation fondamentale mais également à vocation plus appliquée (risques, ressources);
2. des articles de synthèse, faisant le point sur les avancées dans un domaine spécifique des Géosciences, qu''elles soient méthodologiques ou régionales ;
3. des monographies sur la géologie d’une région donnée, assorties d’informations supplémentaires, cartes, coupes, logs, profils sismiques … publiées en ligne en annexe de l’article ;
4. des articles courts de type « express letter » ;
5. des livrets-guides d’excursion (qui suivront le même processus d’examen éditorial que les articles plus classiques) ;
6. des comptes rendus de campagnes à la mer ;
7. des articles de données géodésiques, géophysiques ou géochimiques, pouvant devenir des articles de référence pouvant conduire à des interprétations ultérieures.
BSGF - Earth Sciences Bulletin constitue également un forum pour les discussions entre spécialistes des Sciences de la Terre, de type comment-reply ou autre. Tous les articles publiés, quelle que soit leur forme, seront accessibles sans frais (articles en Open Access) sur le site de la SGF et sur celui de Geosciences World dans la mesure où les auteurs se seront acquittés d’une contribution de (Article Processing Charges – APC) de 300€ pour les membres de la SGF et 500€ pour les non-membres.