Helping Not Hurting: Applying the Stereotype Content Model and BIAS Map to Social Robotics

Hannah Mieczkowski, S. Liu, Jeffrey T. Hancock, Byron Reeves
{"title":"Helping Not Hurting: Applying the Stereotype Content Model and BIAS Map to Social Robotics","authors":"Hannah Mieczkowski, S. Liu, Jeffrey T. Hancock, Byron Reeves","doi":"10.1109/HRI.2019.8673307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines relationships between perceptions of warmth and competence, emotional responses, and behavioral tendencies in the context of social robots. Participants answered questions about these three aspects of impression formation after viewing an image of one of 342 social robots in the Stanford Social Robots Database. Results suggest that people have similar emotional and behavioral reactions to robots as they have to humans; impressions of the robots' warmth and competence predicted specific emotional responses (admiration, envy, contempt, pity) and those emotional responses predicted distinct behavioral tendencies (active facilitation, active harm, passive facilitation, passive harm). However, the predicted relationships between impressions and harmful behavioral tendencies were absent. This novel asymmetry for perceptions and intentions towards robots is deliberated in the context of the computers as social actors framework and opportunities for further research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":6600,"journal":{"name":"2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)","volume":"46 1","pages":"222-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

This paper examines relationships between perceptions of warmth and competence, emotional responses, and behavioral tendencies in the context of social robots. Participants answered questions about these three aspects of impression formation after viewing an image of one of 342 social robots in the Stanford Social Robots Database. Results suggest that people have similar emotional and behavioral reactions to robots as they have to humans; impressions of the robots' warmth and competence predicted specific emotional responses (admiration, envy, contempt, pity) and those emotional responses predicted distinct behavioral tendencies (active facilitation, active harm, passive facilitation, passive harm). However, the predicted relationships between impressions and harmful behavioral tendencies were absent. This novel asymmetry for perceptions and intentions towards robots is deliberated in the context of the computers as social actors framework and opportunities for further research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帮助而不是伤害:将刻板印象内容模型和偏见地图应用于社交机器人
本文研究了在社交机器人的背景下,对温暖和能力的感知、情绪反应和行为倾向之间的关系。在观看斯坦福社交机器人数据库中的342个社交机器人中的一个的图像后,参与者回答了关于印象形成的这三个方面的问题。研究结果表明,人们对机器人的情感和行为反应与对人类的相似;对机器人的热情和能力的印象预测了特定的情绪反应(钦佩、嫉妒、蔑视、怜悯),而这些情绪反应预测了不同的行为倾向(主动促进、主动伤害、被动促进、被动伤害)。然而,印象和有害行为倾向之间的预测关系是不存在的。在计算机作为社会行动者的框架和进一步研究的机会的背景下,对机器人的感知和意图的这种新颖的不对称进行了审议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Arpi, a Social Robot for Children with Epilepsy AMIGUS: A Robot Companion for Students (Video Abstract) MAPPO: The Assistance Pet for Oncological Children (Video Abstract) ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2022, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, March 7 - 10, 2022 Leveraging Non-Experts and Formal Methods to Automatically Correct Robot Failures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1