{"title":"Clinical evaluation of Xive implants 3-year after placement","authors":"Ruixia Wang, Hua Yuan, Ning Chen, Guoping Wang, Zhaoping Fang, Guoxing Zhou","doi":"10.1016/S1007-4376(09)60011-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The main purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of Xive implants 3-year after insertion.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>219 Xive implants were placed in 139 patients and their clinical effects were evaluated using the Albrektsson Standard.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 3-year survival rate of the Xive implants is 97.26%(213/219). Eleven cases of immediate implants and 15 cases of implant insertion after maxillary sinus lifting all succeeded. The failure ratio is 6/219(2.74%) with failures resulting from excess bone loss in the implant region, peri-implant mucosal inflammation or continuous pain caused by some unknown reasons.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Xive implants are clinically effective for the restoration of missing teeth. Immediate implant and implant following maxillary sinus lifting were also successful.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nanjing Medical University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1007-4376(09)60011-3","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nanjing Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1007437609600113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
The main purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of Xive implants 3-year after insertion.
Methods
219 Xive implants were placed in 139 patients and their clinical effects were evaluated using the Albrektsson Standard.
Results
The 3-year survival rate of the Xive implants is 97.26%(213/219). Eleven cases of immediate implants and 15 cases of implant insertion after maxillary sinus lifting all succeeded. The failure ratio is 6/219(2.74%) with failures resulting from excess bone loss in the implant region, peri-implant mucosal inflammation or continuous pain caused by some unknown reasons.
Conclusion
Xive implants are clinically effective for the restoration of missing teeth. Immediate implant and implant following maxillary sinus lifting were also successful.